Skip to main content
Log in

MEBC: social network immunization via motif-based edge-betweenness centrality

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immunization of social networks has attracted increasing attention over the last decade. Various algorithms have been proposed based on the topological structure of networks, such as the degree and betweenness of nodes. However, most of these studies have only observed the basic topological structure at the level of individual nodes, ignoring higher-order structures captured by network motifs, which may lead to insufficient performance. Besides, immunization based on the connectivity pattern of nodes such as the degree in a social network may cause integrity problems and also interfere in other users’ regular activities because the absence of the hub nodes can greatly impair the connectivity of the network. Thus, we introduce the edge-betweenness as a metric of social network immunization that is much more effective than other traditional measures and reflects the significant role that edges play in reducing the damage and cost of the immunizing process. In this paper, a new network immunization algorithm is proposed by combining higher-order structures and edge-betweenness to select an edge set to be immunized. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world networks to show that the new algorithm can significantly improve the effectiveness of the immunization and reduce the impact of the structure of the network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamic LA, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog. In: International workshop on link discovery, pp 36–43

  2. Beineke LW, Oellermann OR, Pippert RE (2002) The average connectivity of a graph. Discret Math 252(1):31–45

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson AR, Gleich DF, Leskovec J (2016) Higher-order organization of complex networks. Science 353(6295):163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandes U (2001) A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Sociol 25(2):163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Paul G, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Stanley HE (2008) Finding a better immunization strategy. Phys Rev Lett 101(5):058701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coletto M, Garimella K, Gionis A, Lucchese C (2017) A motif-based approach for identifying controversy. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM17/paper/view/15653/14838

  7. Dakiche N, Tayeb FB-S, Slimani Y, Benatchba K (2019) Tracking community evolution in social networks: a survey. Inf Process Manag 56(3):1084–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huesch M, Ver Steeg G, Galstyan A (2013) Vaccination (anti-) campaigns in social media. In: Workshops at the twenty-seventh AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  9. Kashtan N, Itzkovitz S, Milo R, Alon U (2004) Efficient sampling algorithm for estimating subgraph concentrations and detecting network motifs. Bioinformatics 20(11):1746–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos É (2003) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 137–146

  11. Kitsak M, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley HE, Makse HA (2010) Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nat Phys 6(11):888–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kušen E, Strembeck M (2020) You talkin’to me? exploring human/bot communication patterns during riot events. Inf Process Manag 57(1):102126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee D, Choi W, Kértesz J, Kahng B (2017) Universal mechanism for hybrid percolation transitions. Sci Rep 7(1):5723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li X, Guo J, Gao C, Zhang L, Zhang Z (2018) A hybrid strategy for network immunization. Chaos Solitons Fract 106:214–219

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannige RV, Haxton TK, Proulx C, Robertson EJ, Battigelli A, Butterfoss GL, Zuckermann RN, Whitelam S (2015) Peptoid nanosheets exhibit a new secondary-structure motif. Nature 526(7573):415–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maslov S, Sneppen K (2002) Specificity and stability in topology of protein networks. Science 296(5569):910–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mcauley J, Leskovec J (2012) Learning to discover social circles in ego networks. In: International conference on neural information processing systems, pp 539–547

  18. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U (2002) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298(5594):824–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Ltzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chktovskii D, Alan U (2011) Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks

  20. Moody J (2001) Peer influence groups: identifying dense clusters in large networks. Soc Netw 23(4):261–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morone F, Makse H (2015) Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation. Nature 527(7579):544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morone F, Min B, Bo L, Mari R, Makse HA (2016) Collective influence algorithm to find influencers via optimal percolation in massively large social media. Sci Rep 6:30062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paranjape A, Benson AR, Leskovec J (2017) Motifs in temporal networks. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, pp 601–610

  24. Prill RJ, Iglesias PA, Levchenko A (2005) Dynamic properties of network motifs contribute to biological network organization. Plos Biol 3(11):e343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rossi RA, Ahmed NK, Koh E (2018) Higher-order network representation learning. In: Companion proceedings of the the web conference 2018, WWW ’18, international world wide web conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, pp 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186900

  26. Rotabi R, Kamath K, Kleinberg J, Sharma A (2017) Detecting strong ties using network motifs, pp 983–992

  27. Ruan Z, Iniguez G, Karsai M, Kertész J (2015) Kinetics of social contagion. Phys Rev Lett 115(21):218702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider CM, Mihaljev T, Havlin S, Herrmann HJ (2011) Suppressing epidemics with a limited amount of immunization units. Phys Rev E 84(6):061911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schreiber F, Schwöbbermeyer H (2005) Mavisto: a tool for the exploration of network motifs. Bioinformatics 21(17):3572–3574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simmel G (1908) Sociology: investigations on the forms of sociation

  31. Sporns O, Kötter R (2004) Motifs in brain networks. Plos Biol 2(11):e369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tsourakakis CE, Pachocki J, Mitzenmacher M (2017) Scalable motif-aware graph clustering. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web’, WWW ’17, international world wide web conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1451–1460. https://doi.org/10.1145/3038912.3052653

  33. Vega-Oliveros DA, Gomes PS, Milios EE, Berton L (2019) A multi-centrality index for graph-based keyword extraction. Inf Process Manag 56(6):102063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang P, Lü J, Yu X (2014) Identification of important nodes in directed biological networks: a network motif approach. Plos One 9(8):e106132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wernicke S (2006) Efficient detection of network motifs. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform (TCBB) 3(4):347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wernicke S, Rasche F (2006) Fanmod: a tool for fast network motif detection. Bioinformatics 22(9):1152–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan X, Han J (2002) gSpan: graph-based substructure pattern mining. In: 2002 IEEE international conference on data mining, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 721–724

  38. Yin H, Benson AR, Leskovec J, Gleich DF (2017) Local higher-order graph clustering. In: ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 555–564

  39. Zhao H, Xu X, Song Y, Lee DL, Chen Z, Gao H (2018) Ranking users in social networks with higher-order structures. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/16122

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61976162, No. 82174230), Key Projects of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (No. 2018B030311003), Science and Technologies Major Project of Hubei Province (Next-Generation AI Technologies) (No. 2019AEA170). Joint Fund for Translational Medicine and Interdisciplinary Research of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (No. ZNJC202016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenbin Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Code availability

https://github.com/kgao-whu/MEBC.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, K., Yuan, G., Yang, Y. et al. MEBC: social network immunization via motif-based edge-betweenness centrality. Knowl Inf Syst 64, 1263–1281 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01671-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01671-y

Keywords

Navigation