Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New cosine similarity and distance measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and TOPSIS approach

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most straightforward approaches to checking the degrees of similarity and differentiation between two sets are to use distance and cosine similarity metrics. The cosine of the angle between two n-dimensional vectors in n-dimensional space is called cosine similarity. Even though the two sides are dissimilar in size, cosine similarity may readily find commonalities since it deals with the angle in between. Cosine similarity is widely used because it is simple, ideal for usage with sparse data, and deals with the angle between two vectors rather than their magnitude. The distance function is an elegant and canonical quantitative tool to measure the similarity or difference between two sets. This work presents new metrics of distance and cosine similarity amongst Fermatean fuzzy sets. Initially, the definitions of the new measures based on Fermatean fuzzy sets were presented, and their properties were explored. Considering that the cosine measure does not satisfy the axiom of similarity measure, then we propose a method to construct other similarity measures between Fermatean fuzzy sets based on the proposed cosine similarity and Euclidean distance measures and it satisfies the axiom of the similarity measure. Furthermore, we obtain a cosine distance measure between Fermatean fuzzy sets by using the relationship between the similarity and distance measures, then we extend the technique for order of preference by similarity to the ideal solution method to the proposed cosine distance measure, which can deal with the related decision-making problems not only from the point of view of geometry but also from the point of view of algebra. Finally, we give a practical example to illustrate the reasonableness and effectiveness of the proposed method, which is also compared with other existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The manuscript has no associated data.

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Akram M, Shahzadi G, Ahmadini AAH (2020) Decision-making framework for an effective sanitizer to reduce COVID-19 under Fermatean fuzzy environment. J Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3263407

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR, Riaz A (2022) Group decision-making with Fermatean fuzzy soft expert knowledge. Artif Intell Rev 55:5349–5389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydin S (2021) A fuzzy MCDM method based on new Fermatean fuzzy theories. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 20(3):881–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Donghai L, Yuanyuan L, Xiaohong C (2019) Fermatean fuzzy linguistic set and its application in multicriteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34:878–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donghai L, Yuanyuan L, Lizhen W (2019) Distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term sets based on linguistic scale function: an illustration of the TODIM and TOPSIS methods. J Intell Syst 34:2807–2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng F, Fujita H, Ali MA, Yager RR, Liu X (2019) Another view on generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and related multi- attribute decision-making methods. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(3):476–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garg H (2016) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg H (2016) A novel correlation coefficient between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to the decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 31(12):1234–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garg H (2016) Some series of intuitionistic averaging aggregation operators. SpringerPlus 5(1):999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg H, Shahzadi G, Akram M (2020) Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Math Probl Eng 2020, Article ID 7279027

  12. Kirişci M, Demir I, Şimşek N (2021) Soft set-based new decision-making method with cardiovascular disease application. Sigma J Eng Natl Sci 39(5):48–55

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kirişci M (2020) Medical decision-making concerning the fuzzy soft sets. J Interdiscipl Math 23(4):767–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirişci M (2020) A case study for medical decision making with the fuzzy soft sets. Afri Mat 31:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirişci M (2021) \(\Omega -\) Soft sets and medical decision-making application. Int J Comput Math 98(4):690–704

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirisci, M (2022) New Entropy, and distance measures for Fermatean fuzzy soft sets with medical decision-making and pattern recognition applications. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1796355/v1.

  17. Kirisci M, Demir I, Simsek N (2022) Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria GroupDecision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection. Artif Intell Med 127:102278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simsek N, Kirisci M (2022) Incomplete Fermatean Fuzzy Preference Relations and GroupDecision Making, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359788580_Incomplete_Fermatean_Fuzzy_Preference_Relations_and_Group_Decision_Making

  19. Kirisci M (2022) Fermatean Hesitant fuzzy sets with medical decision making application. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1151389/v2

  20. Kirisci M (2022) Fermatean fuzzy type variance, covariance and correlation coefficients with their application. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361944624_Fermatean_Fuzzy_Type_Variance_Covariance_and_Correlation_Coefficients_with_their_Application

  21. Kirisci M, Simsek N (2022) A new data analysis technique based on Fermatean fuzzy soft matrices in the diagnosis of infectious diseases and lung cancer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363691145_A_New_Data_Analysis_Technique_based_on_Fermatean_Fuzzy_Soft_Matrices_in_the_Diagnosis_of_Infectious_Diseases_and_Lung_Cancer

  22. Kirisci M, Simsek N (2022) Decision-making method related to Pythagorean fuzzy soft sets with infectious diseases application. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 34(8):5968–5978

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng XJ (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271(3):125–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu D, Liu Y, Chen X (2019) Fermatean fuzzy linguistic set and its application in multi-criteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34(5):878–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu D, Liu Y, Wang L (2019) Distance measure for Fermatean fuzzy linguistic term sets based on linguistic scale function: an illustration of the TODIM and TOPSIS methods. Int J Intell Syst 34(11):2807–2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng X, Yang Y, Song J, Jiang Y (2015) Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application. Comput Eng 41:224–229

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peng X, Selvachandran G (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev 52:1873–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahzadi G, Akram M (2021) Group decision-making for the selection of an antivirus mask under fermatean fuzzy soft information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(1):1401–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Senapati T, Yager RR (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Hum Comput 11:663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smarandache F (2005) Neutrosophic set, a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inter J Pure Appl Math 24:287–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sridevi B, Nadarajan R (2009) Fuzzy similarity measure for generalized fuzzy numbers. Int J Open Probl Comput Math 2(2):240–253

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Xuecheng L (1992) Entropy, distance measure and similarity measure of fuzzy sets and their relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 52(3):305–318

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu C, Shen J (2021) Multi-criteria decision-making and pattern recognition based on similarity measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 41(6):5847–5863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei G (2018) Some similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 15(1):77–89

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):634–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proc. Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada

  38. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28:436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(1–2):91–97

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Comp 8:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng W, Li H (2006) Relationship between similarity measure and entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(11):1477–1484

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou L, Tao Z, Chen H, Liu J (2014) Intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted cosine similarity measure. Group Decis Negot 23(4):879–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments that helped us improve this manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors equally contributed to the design and implementation of the research, the analysis of the results, and the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Kirişci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirişci, M. New cosine similarity and distance measures for Fermatean fuzzy sets and TOPSIS approach. Knowl Inf Syst 65, 855–868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01776-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01776-4

Keywords