Skip to main content
Log in

A new type of cosine similarity measures based on intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy rough sets for the evaluation of volatile currency: evidence from the Pakistan economy

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Knowledge and Information Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article proposes novel cosine and weighted cosine similarity measures based on intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy rough sets and examines their fundamental characteristics. Similarity measures are crucial and advantageous tools that have a broad range of applications in decision making, data mining, medical diagnosis, and pattern recognition. To demonstrate the validity of the proposed similarity measures, an illustrative example in the evaluation of volatile currency in Pakistan is presented to verify the efficacy of our approach. Additionally, the rankings of suggested similarity measures are compared to those identified in the literature. The findings demonstrate that the innovative similarity measures lead in consistent patterns of ranking. The comparison confirms that the suggested similarity measures methodologies may achieve precise classification results and are applicable to real-world challenges involving hesitancy and uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data are available in the manuscript.

References

  1. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura A (1988) Fuzzy rough sets. Note Mult Valued Log Jpn 9(8):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J Gen Syst 17(2–3):191–209

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornelis C, De Cock M, Kerre EE (2003) Intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets: at the crossroads of imperfect knowledge. Expert Syst 20(5):260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recogn Lett 25(14):1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yong D, Wenkang S, Feng D, Qi L (2004) A new similarity measure of generalized fuzzy numbers and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett 25(8):875–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfeng–Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(16):3101–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liang Z, Shi P (2003) Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recogn Lett 24(15):2687–2693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Z (2007) Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 6(2):109–121

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahmood T, Ur Rehman U (2022) A novel approach towards bipolar complex fuzzy sets and their applications in generalized similarity measures. Int J Intell Syst 37(1):535–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali Z, Mahmood T, Yang MS (2020) TOPSIS method based on complex spherical fuzzy sets with Bonferroni mean operators. Mathematics 8(10):1739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rehman UU, Mahmood T (2021) Picture fuzzy N-soft sets and their applications in decision making problems. Fuzzy Inf Eng 13(3):335–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmood T (2022) The generalized dice similarity measures for bipolar complex fuzzy set and its applications to pattern recognition and medical diagnosis. Comput Appl Math 41(6):1–30

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang H, Hu BQ (2021) A decision-theoretic fuzzy rough set in hesitant fuzzy information systems and its application in multi-attribute decision making. Inf Sci 579:103–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu ZS, Chen J (2008) An overview of distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 16(04):529–555

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu Z, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8(2):123–139

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang X, Song X, Qi Y, Yang J (2014) Constructive and axiomatic approaches to hesitant fuzzy rough set. Soft Comput 18(6):1067–1077

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang H, Shu L, Liao S (2017) Hesitant fuzzy rough set over two universes and its application in decision making. Soft Comput 21(7):1803–1816

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Torra V, Narukawa Y (2009) On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems. IEEE, pp 1378–1382

  21. Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, vol 35. ISBN : 978-3-7908-2463-6

  22. Beg I, Rashid T (2014) Group decision making using intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Fuzzy Log Intell Syst 14(3):181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chinram R, Hussain A, Mahmood T, Ali MI (2021) EDAS method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough aggregation operators. IEEE Access 9:10199–10216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhattacharya A (1946) On a measure of divergence between two multinomial populations. Sankhy\(\bar{{\rm a}}\): the indian journal of statistics, pp 401–406

  25. Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(1–2):91–97

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Malik SU (2014) Determinants of currency depreciation in Pakistan

  27. Raza SA, Afshan S (2017) Determinants of exchange rate in Pakistan: revisited with structural break testing. Glob Bus Rev 18(4):825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. https://www.sbp.org.pk/ and https://www.pbs.gov.pk/trade-summary

  29. Pramanik S, Mondal K (2015) Cotangent similarity measure of rough neutrosophic sets and its application to medical diagnosis. J New Theory 4:90–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Umm Al-Qura University for supporting this work by Grant Code: (23UQU4350518DSR001).

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attaullah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflict of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Attaullah, Ullah, S., Drissi, R. et al. A new type of cosine similarity measures based on intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy rough sets for the evaluation of volatile currency: evidence from the Pakistan economy. Knowl Inf Syst 65, 4741–4758 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-01909-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-01909-3

Keywords

Navigation