Skip to main content
Log in

Universal multimedia information access

  • Special issue on multimodality: a step towards universal access
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efficient, effective and intuitive access to multimedia information is essential for business, education, government and leisure. Unfortunately, interface design typically does not account for users with disabilities, estimated at 40 million in America alone. Given broad societal needs, our community has a social responsibility to provide universal designs that ensure efficient and effective access for all to heterogeneous and increasingly growing repositories of global information. This article describes information access functions, discusses associated grand challenges, and outlines potential benefits of technologies that promise to increase overall accessibility and success of interaction with multimedia. The article concludes by projecting the future of multimodal technology via a roadmap of multimodal resources, methods, and systems from 2003 through 2006.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. André E, Rist T, Müller, J (1999) Employing AI methods to control the behavior of animated interface agents. Applied Artif Intell 13:415–448

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boykin S, Merlino A (Feb 2000) Machine learning of event segmentation for news on demand. Commun ACM 43(2):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce I, McKennell A, Walker E (1991) Blind and partially sighted adults in britain: the RNIB survey. HMSO, London

  4. Cowan N (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Brain Behav Sci 24(1):87–114

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaquith J (1996) The role of short term memory on academic achievement. Retrieved May 2002 from http://www.nacd.org

  6. Johnson WL, Rickel J (1998) Steve: an animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments. SIGART Bull 8:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jameson A, Schäfer R, Weis T, Berthold A, Weyrath T (1999) Making systems sensitive to the user’s changing resource limitations. Knowl Syst 12:413–425

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jameson A (2002) Intelligent user interfaces: closing the usability gap. In: Colloquium on the Future of Human–Computer Interaction at the Center for Human–Computer Communication, Portland, Oregon. http://207.98.103.220:7070/ramgen/drivee/jameson_02apr26.rm. Cited 20 February 2003

  9. Light M, Maybury M (May 2002) Personalized multimedia information access: ask questions, get personalized answers. Comm ACM 45(5): 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mani I (2001) Automated text summarization. John Benjimans, Amsterdam

  11. Mani I, Maybury M (eds) (1999) Advances in automatic text summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  12. Maybury M, Merlino A, Morey D (1997) Broadcast news navigation using story segments. In: ACM international multimedia conference, Seattle, Wash., 8–14 November 1997. ACM Press, New York

  13. Maybury M (2000) News on demand: introduction. Commun ACM 43(2):32–34

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maybury M (2000) Ask questions, get answers. In: First international conference on adaptive hypertext ’00, Trento, Italy, 29 August 29 2000. http://AH2000.itc.it/Maybury-AH2000.pdf. Cited 21 February 2003

  15. Maybury M (2001) Extraction of knowledge from unstructured text. http://www.mitre.org/resources/centers/it/maybury/information_access_tutorial.ppt. Cited 23 February 2003

  16. Maybury M, Martin J-C (eds) (2002) Working notes of the workshop on multimodal resources and multimodal systems evaluation. In: Third international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC). Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain, 1 June 2002

  17. Maybury MT, Wahlster W (eds) (1998) Readings in intelligent user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.

  18. Merlino A, Maybury M (1999) An empirical study of the optimal presentation of multimedia summaries of broadcast news. In: Mani I, Maybury M (eds) Automated text summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  19. Miller G (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits of our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Center for Health Statistics (2003) www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm Cited 20 February 2003

  21. Oviatt S (1997) Multimodal interactive maps: Designing for human performance. Hum–Comput Interaction 12:93–129

  22. Sperling G (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol Monogr 74:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  23. Umansky D (ed) (2001) Medizin Guidebook 8(1):2

  24. Vanderheiden GC (1988) Overview of the basic selection techniques for augmentative communication: past and future. In: Berstein LE (ed) The vocally impaired: clinical practice and research. Grune and Stratuon, Philadeplphia

  25. Voorhees E (2001) An overview of the TREC 2001 question answering track. http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec10/papers/qa10.pdf. Cited 20 February 2003

  26. Bordegoni M, Faconti G, Feiner S, Maybury MT, Rist T, Ruggieri S, Trahanias P, Wilson M (1997) A Standard Reference Model for Intelligent Multimedia Presentation Systems. In: Computer Standards & Interfaces 18(6,7) December 1997, North-Holland, pp 477–496. www.dfki.uni-sb.de/∼rist/csi.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark T. Maybury.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maybury, M. Universal multimedia information access. UAIS 2, 96–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-002-0043-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-002-0043-5

Keywords

Navigation