Skip to main content
Log in

Designing assistive technologies for medication regimes in care settings

  • Special issue on countering design exclusion
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents some early design work of the Care in the Digital Community research project begun under the EPSRC IRC Network project Equator. Gaining a comprehensive understanding of user requirements in care settings poses interesting methodological challenges. This paper details some methodological options for working in the domestic domain and documents the translation of research into design recommendations. We report on the importance of medication issues in a hostel for former psychiatric patients and present an early prototype of a medication manager designed to be sensitive to the particular requirements of the setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson R (1994) Representations and requirements: the value of ethnography in system design. Hum Comput Interaction 9:151

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bjørneby S (2000) ‘Smart houses’: can they really benefit older people? Signpost 5(2):pp 36-38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheverst K, Cobb S, Hemmings T, Kember S, Friday A, Phillips P, Procter R, Rodden T, Rouncefield M (2001) Design with care. EDRA32 2001, Workshop symposium on adding the user into the design of the home in the digital age, July 2001, Edinburgh

  4. Clarkson PJ, Keates S (2001) A practical inclusive design approach. Proceedings of INCLUDE 2001, London, p 72

  5. Dadong Wan (1999) Magic medicine cabinet: a situated portal for consumer healthcare. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on handheld and ubiquitous computing (HUC ‘99), 27–29 September 1999, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 352–355

  6. Dewsbury G, Edge M (2001) Designing the home to meet the needs of tomorrow ...today: smart technology, health and well-being. Open House Int 26(2):33 http://www.smartthinking.ukideas.com/_OHI.pdf

  7. Dewsbury G (2001) The social and psychological aspects of smart home technology within the care sector. New Technol Hum Services 14(1–2):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards K, Grinter R (2001) At home with ubiquitous computing. Proceedings of UbiComp ‘01, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 263

  9. Feenberg A (1996) Marcuse or Habermas: two critiques of technology. Inquiry 39:57

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fisk M (2001) The implications of smart home technologies. In: Peace S, Holland C (eds) Inclusive housing in an ageing society. Polity Press, Bristol, UK, p 119

  11. Gaver W (2001) The presence project. Computer Related Design Research Studio, RCA, London

  12. Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E (1999) Cultural probes. Interactions 6(1):21–29

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gaver W, Dunne A, Pacenti E (1999) Design: cultural probes. In: Interactions: new visions of human-computer interaction. ACM, Danvers, MA

  14. Gitlin L (1995) Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations 19(1):43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes JA, King V, Rodden T, Andersen H (1994) Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: Proceedings of CSCW ‘94, Chapel Hill, NC

  16. Hughes J, O’Brien J, Rodden T (1998) Understanding technology in domestic environments. Proceedings of CoBuild ‘98, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 248–261

  17. Hughes J, O’Brien J, Rodden T, Rouncefield M, Viller S (2000) Patterns of home life: informing design for domestic environments. Personal Technol 4(1):25–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lupton D, Seymour W (2000) Technology, selfhood and physical disability. Social Sci Med 50:1852

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mateas M et al. (1996) Engineering ethnography in the home. Proceedings of CHI ‘96, ACM Press, Vancouver, pp 283–284

  20. Microchip (2001) Microchip PIC 16F87X data sheet, 2001. (www.microchip.com)

  21. Mynatt E, Rowan J, Jacobs A, Craighill S (2001) Digital family portraits: providing peace of mind for extended family members. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘01), Seattle, ACM Press, New York, pp 333–340

  22. O’Brien J, Hughes J, Rodden T, Rouncefield M (1999) At home with the technology. ACM Transactions on computer-human interaction 6(3):282–308

    Google Scholar 

  23. O’Brien J, Rodden T (1997) Interactive systems in domestic environments. Proceedings of DIS ‘97, ACM Press, Amsterdam, pp 247–259

  24. Phillip H (2001) Charge transfer sensing. Quantum Research Group White Paper 2001. (www.qprox.com)

  25. Sacks H (1995) General introduction. In: Jefferson G (ed) Lectures on conversation, part VI, Fall 1967, Blackwell, Oxford, p 621

  26. Sheaff R (1996) The need for healthcare. Routledge, London

  27. The DIRC Project – http://www.dirc.org.uk/

  28. The Equator Project – http://www.equator.ac.uk/. For greater detail on the construction of the medication manager, go to http://www.equator.ac.uk/digicare/

  29. Tweed C, Quigley G (2000) The design and technological feasibility of home systems for the elderly. The Queens University, Belfast

  30. Venkatesh A (1996) Computers and other interactive technologies for the home. Communications of the ACM, 39(12)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G. et al. Designing assistive technologies for medication regimes in care settings. UAIS 2, 235–242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0055-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0055-9

Keywords

Navigation