Abstract
ISO TS 16071 Guidance on accessibility for human computer interfaces was developed via the collection and evaluation of an extensive set of existing software accessibility research and guidance. While this approach has served well in creating this first major international software accessibility standard, it is limited in its ability to expand the range of its guidance to areas not covered by existing research. This paper introduces a universal access reference model that can be used to identify areas requiring further accessibility guidance. It also demonstrates the use of this reference model in identifying guidelines that should be considered for potential addition to ISO 16071, as it progresses from a technical specification to an international standard.







Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assistive Technology Industry Association (2002) AT-IT compatibility guidelines version 1.05. http://www.atia.org/AT_Compatibility_Guidelines_v1.05.pdf. Cited 2002
Bergman E, Johnson E (1995) Towards accessible human-computer interaction. In: Nielson J (ed) Advances in human computer interaction, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Carter J, Fourney D (2003) The Canadian position regarding the evolution of ISO TS 16071 towards becoming an international standard. ISO TC159 / SC4 / WG5 document N0731
Disabled Peoples International (1993) Constitution of disabled peoples international. http://www.dpi.org/en/about_us/constitution.htm. Cited 1993
European Co-operation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (1999) The current situation concerning potential alleviations to identified barriers. http://www.stakes.fi/cost219/COSB220.html. Cited 1999
Gaines B, Shaw M (1986) A learning model for forecasting the future of information technology. Fut Comp Sys 1(1):31–70
Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Basic design for all principles. http://www.stakes.fi/include/pam2.html. Cited 2000
Inclusion of Disabled and Elderly People in Telematics (2000) Factors affecting uptake and use of technology. http://www.stakes.fi/include/incc320.html. Cited 2000
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–13—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 13: User guidance
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–14—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs—Part 14: Menu dialogues
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 9241–15—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 15: Command dialogues
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1999) ISO 9241–16—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 16: Direct manipulation dialogues
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO 9241–17—Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 17: Form filling dialogues
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2003) ISO 14915–2—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—navigation and control (Final Draft International Standard)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO 14915–3—Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces—media selection and combination, (Final Draft International Standard).
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2002) ISO TS 16071—Ergonomics of human system interaction—guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2001) ISO/IEC Guide 71.2. Draft guidelines to address the needs of older persons and people with disabilities when developing standards
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1998) ISO/IEC JTC1 N5611 (1998) Elements of reflection on cultural and linguistic adaptability of products and standards in the field of information and communication technologies
Jacko J, Vitense H (2001) A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:56–76
Lindgaard G (2002) Emotion, reason and the dichotomies that influence technology. http://www.carleton.ca/hotlab/hottopics/Articles/reasonandemotion.html. Cited 2002
Lynch G, Meads J (1986) In search of a user interface reference model: report on the SIGCHI workshop on user interface reference models. SIGCHI Bulletin 18(2):25–33
Maskery H, Meads J (1992) Context: in the eyes of users and in computer systems. SIGCHI Bulletin 24(2):12–21
McDermott R, Varenne (1995) Culture as disability. Anthrop Educ Quart 26(3):324–348
Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL
Stephanidis C, Savidis, A (2001) Universal access in the information society: methods, tools, and interaction technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1:40–55
Taubes G (2000) Transparent computing. http://domino.watson.ibm.com/comm/wwwr_thinkresearch.nsf/pages/coverstory100.html. Cited 2000
United Nations Commission for Social Development on Disability (1993) United Nations standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities (A/RES/48/96). http://www.independentliving.org/standardrules/. Cited 1993
Vanderheiden G (1990) Thirty-something million: should they be exceptions? Hum Fact 32(4):383–396
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2002) XML accessibility guidelines. http://www.w3.org/TR/xag. Cited 2002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carter, J., Fourney, D. Using a universal access reference model to identify further guidance that belongs in ISO 16071. Univ Access Inf Soc 3, 17–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0074-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-003-0074-6