Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design for participation: providing access to e-information for older adults

  • Long paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electronic information sources are becoming increasingly more prolific and offer a huge potential for those able to use them. However, for those unable to access those services, there is the risk of being further disadvantaged by continued exclusion from an increasing number of services. This paper presents two examples of kiosks designed to help principally older adults access online governmental information sources. The design issues identified and the implications for future kiosk interface designs, both for hardware and software, are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11. a

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (1990), US Public Law 101–336, USA

  2. Buhler C (2002) eEurope—eAccessibility—user participation: participation of people with disabilities and older people in the information society. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W (eds) Computers helping people with special needs. LNCS 2398, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  3. Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

  4. Coleman R (1993) A demographic overview of the ageing of first world populations. Appl Erg 24(1): 5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum. SAMS Publishing, Indianapolis, IN

  6. Coy J, Keates S, Clarkson PJ, Harrison L, Robinson P (2001) Design for accessibility: the personal information point. Proceedings of Mail Technology, Evolution to E Revolution, IMechE Professional Engineering Publishing, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Disability Discrimination Act (1995) Chapter 50, Department for Education and Employment, UK

  8. Grundy E, Ahlburg D, Ali M, Breeze E, Sloggett A (1999) Disability in Great Britain. Department of Social Security, Research Report No. 94, Corporate Document Services, London, UK

  9. Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2003) Countering design exclusion: an introduction to inclusive design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keates S, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (1999) Designing a usable interface for an interactive robot. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR 99), Stanford, CA, July 1999

  11. Mannikko-Barbutiu S (2002) Networking for accessibility: elderly people and new technology. In: Miesenberger K, Klaus J, Zagler W (eds) Computers helping people with special needs, LNCS 2398, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  12. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D (1988) OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. Report 1: The prevalence of disability among adults, HMSO, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishing, San Francisco, CA

  14. Nishimoto T, Araki M, Yasuhisa N (2001) The practical side of teaching the elderly visually impaired users to use the e-mail. In: Stephanidis C (ed) Universal access in HCI—towards an information society for All. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

  15. Pieper M, Morasch H, Piela G (2002) Bridging the education divide. In: Keates S, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (eds) Universal access and assistive technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  16. Peebles L, Norris B (1998) Adultdata: the handbook of adult anthropometric and strength measurements—data for design safety. Department of Trade and Industry. London, UK

  17. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (1973) US Public Law 93–112, USA

  18. RNIB (2002)http://www.rnib.org.uk/wesupply/fctsheet/statistics.htm. Cited 2002

  19. RNID (2002)http://www.rnid.org.uk/html/info_leaflets_this_is_rnid.htm. Cited 2002

  20. Semmence J, Gault S, Hussain M, Hall P, Stanborough J, Pickering E (1998) Family Resources Survey, Great Britain 1996–97. Department of Social Security, Corporate Document Services, London, UK

  21. Smith S, Norris B, Peebles L (2000) Older adultdata: the handbook of measurements and capabilities of the older adult—data for design safety. UK Department of Trade and Industry, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  22. W3C (2002) Web Accessibility Initiative. Available at:http://www.w3c.org/WAI/. Cited 2002

  23. Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (1998) US Public Law 105–220, USA

  24. Young RTP (2002) 3rd age interfaces: a usability evaluation of the “Your Guide” kiosk prototype from an older user’s perspective. In: Keates S, Langdon P, Clarkson PJ, Robinson P (eds) Universal access and assistive technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Royal Mail for funding these case studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simeon Keates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J. & Robinson, P. Design for participation: providing access to e-information for older adults. Univ Access Inf Soc 3, 149–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0093-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0093-y

Keywords

Navigation