Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Digital switchover or digital divide: a prognosis for usable and accessible interactive digital television in the UK

  • COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The move toward digital switchover increases content and introduces interactive services available through the television. UK legislation advocates universal access and equitable provision of services, across all platforms and equipment, particularly for ‘vulnerable’ groups. However, key aspects of usability and accessibility have been overlooked by those responsible for encouraging this new infrastructure’s inclusive development. Aspects of previous interactive television provision and developments in web accessibility appear to have been ignored, along with findings from relevant user-centred research and even from specifically commissioned reports. This paper will identify these issues and discuss their impact on the inclusiveness of DTV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the UK, “subtitles” is used to refer both to on-screen text that is a translation of (foreign) spoken content, and to text representing spoken and non-spoken audio content for deaf and hard of hearing viewers. The latter is known as “captions” virtually everywhere else in the world

References

  1. Age Concern (2004) Response to the regulation of electronic Programme Guides, http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/past/epg. Cited 2004

  2. Ang I (1991) Desperately seeking the audience. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (2000) http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG10

  4. BBC (2000) Freeing up the TV frequencies. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/450313.stm. Cited 2004

  5. Blomberg J, Burrell M, Guest G (2003) An ethnographic approach to design. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 964–986

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brookes M (2004) Watching alone: social capital and public service broadcasting. The Work Foundation in partnership with the BBC, May 2004

  7. Burke D (2000) A guide to Interactive TV. http://www.whitedot.org/issue/iss_story.asp. Cited 2004

  8. Carmichael A (1999) Style guide for the design of interactive television services for elderly viewers. Independent television commission, Kings Worthy Court, Winchester. Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/acarmichael/Carmichael_DesignStyleGuide.pdf. Cited 2004

  9. Carmichael A, Petrie H, Hamilton F (2003) The VISTA project: broadening access to digital TV electronic programme guides. Psychnol J 1(3):230–242

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charness N, Bosman EA (1992) Human factors and age. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA (eds) The handbook of aging and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale NJ

    Google Scholar 

  11. Christesen L (2004) Out of interactive television. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on interactive television: enhancing the experience, Brighton, UK, March–April 2004

  12. Clark J (2004) Response to Ofcom consultation on draft code providing television access services. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/responses/tv_access_services/responses/?a=87101. Cited 2004

  13. Clarkson J, Keates K (2003) Digital television for all: a report on usability and accessible design, Appendix E—investigating the inclusivity of digital television set-top-box receivers. http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/Digital_TV_for_all_appendix_e.pdf Cited 2004

  14. Cockburn C (1992) The circuit of technology: gender, identity and power. In: Silverstone R, Hirch E (eds) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces, pp 32–47

  15. Communication Act (2003) Crown copyright. http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/20030021.htm. Cited 2004

  16. Consumers’ Association (2001) Turn on, turn in, switch off. Consumer attitudes to digital TV. http://www.dvb.org/documents/white-papers/Consumers%20Association%20Rvue%20of%20Digital%20TV.pdf. Cited 2004

  17. Consumer Expert Group (2004) Persuasion or compulsion? Consumers and analogue switch-off, available at; http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/Consumer_Expert_Group_report.pdf. Cited 2004

  18. Craik FIM, Salthouse TA (2000) The handbook of aging and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  19. Daly-Jones O (2002) Navigating your TV: the usability of electronic programme guides. UsableiTV 3:2–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. DCMS (2004) Secretary of state for culture, media & sport announcement “Digital Switchover: Further Progress”. http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/press/2004/dig_switchover_progress.html. Cited 2004

  21. DCMS (2004) Broadcasting minister statement, “Consumer Expert Report Into Digital Switchover Published”. http://www.culture.gov.uk/global/press_notices/archive_2004/dcms124_04.htm. Cited 2004

  22. Digital Logo (2004) http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/digital_switchover_logo/index.html. Cited 2004

  23. DigiTV project (2004) http://www.digitv.org.uk. Cited 2004

  24. DigiTV project (2004) The new citizen channel for the digital age: delivering local government services on digital interactive TV. http://www.digitv.org.uk/content_images/Digitv_finaldoc_tcm2-568.pdfCited 2004

  25. Disability Rights Commission (2004) Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability. http://www.drc-gb.org/thelaw/practice.asp. Cited 2004

  26. Disability Rights Commission (2004) The web: access and inclusion for disabled people. TSO, London

  27. Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1993) Human–computer interaction. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. DTI (2004) Digital television. http://www.dti.gov.uk/industries/broadcasting/digital_television.html. Cited 2004

  29. DTI/The Generics Group (2003) Digital television for all: a report on usability and accessibility design. http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/Digital_TV_for_all.pdf. Cited 2004

  30. DTP (2004) Digital television action plan. http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/ActionPlanvs12_oct04.pdfCited 2004

  31. Dureau V (2004) Addressable advertising on digital television. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on interactive television: enhancing the experience, Brighton, UK, March–April 2004

  32. Eronen L (2003) User-centred research for interactive television. In: Proceedings of the 1st European conference on interactive television: from viewers to actors, Brighton, UK, April 2003

  33. European design for all e-accessibility network (2004) http://www.e-accessibility.org. Cited 2004

  34. Featherstone D (2004) The future of accesskeys http://www.wats.ca/articles/thefutureofaccesskeys

  35. Fidler R (1997) Mediamorphosis: Understanding new media. Sage Publication Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J, (2004) Designing for older adults. Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gawinski M (2003) Interactive television production. Focal Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gregor P, Sloan D, Newell AF (In press) Disability and technology: building barriers or creating opportunities. In: Zelkowitz M (ed) Advances in computers. Academic, New York

  39. Hanson V, Richards J (2004) A web accessibility service: Updates and findings. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International ACM conference on computers and accessibility, Atlanta GA, New York, pp 169–176

  40. Hinckley K (2003) Input technologies and techniques. In: Jacko J, Sears A (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, pp 151–168

    Google Scholar 

  41. Irving A, Sparham I, Spicer N (2003) Attitudes towards electronic service delivery http://www.dfwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/ih2003-2004/IH117.pdf. Cited 2004

  42. Keates S, Clarkson J (2004) Countering design exclusion: an introduction to inclusive design. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Klein J, Karger S, Sinclair K (2004) Attitudes to digital switchover: the impact of digital switchover on consumer adoption of digital television. http://www.digitaltelevision.gov.uk/pdf_documents/publications/AttitudestoSwitchover_300304.pdfCited 2004

  44. Landscape (2003) Interactive digital sales, issue 6. Landscape, London

  45. Lee SH (1999) Usability testing for developing effective interactive multimedia software: Concepts, dimensions, and procedures. Educ Technol Soc 2(2), ISSN 1436–4522

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Davis R, Dumbreck A (2004) Understanding DTT remote control button labelling: a multi-method approach. Proceedings, Second European conference on Interactive Television, Brighton

  47. Ling R, Thrane K (2002) “I don’t like TV to like learn anything”: the leisure use of TV and the Internet. First Monday 7 (1). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_1/ling/index.html. Cited 2004

  48. Lister M, Dovey J, Giddings S, Grant I, Kelly K (2003) New media: a critical introduction. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lull J (1990) Inside family viewing. Ethnographic research on television’s audiences. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mackay E (1997) Consumption and everyday life. Sage Publication Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Making a Commercial Case for Adopting Web Standards (2004) http://www.maccaws.com. Cited 2004

  52. Morley D (1992) Television, audiences and cultural studies. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  53. Newell AF, Gregor P (1997) Human–computer interfaces for people with disabilities. In: Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV (eds) Handbook of human computer interaction. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 813–824

  54. NHS Direct: A new gateway to healthcare (2004) http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/misc/NHS%20Direct%20AR%20FINAL.pdf. Cited 2004

  55. Norman D (1999) The invisible computer. The MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  56. O’Brien J, Rodden T, Rouncefield M, Hughes J (1999) At home with the technology: an ethnographic study of a set-top-box trail. ACM Trans Comput Human Interact 6(3):282–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ofcom (2004) Consultation on; the regulation of electronic programme guides http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/past/epg. Cited 2004

  58. Ofcom (2004) Driving digital switchover. A report to the Secretary of State. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/dso_report/?a=87101. Cited 2004

  59. Ofcom (2004) Statement on code on electronic programme guides http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/responses/epc/statement/statement.pdf. Cited 2004

  60. Office of the E-envoy (2003) Digital Television. A policy framework for accessing e-government services. http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/digital_tv.pdf. Cited 2004

  61. Parsons HM, Terner J, Kearsley G (1994) Design of remote control units for seniors. Special Issue: Technology and environmental issues for the elderly. Exp Aging Res 20(3):211–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pemberton L, Rice M, Griffiths R (2004) Fear and loathing in the living room. Acceptability issues for interactive television services. In: proceedings for the 18th British HCI conference, Leeds Metropolitan University, September 2004

  63. Rabbitt PMA, Carmichael AR (1994) Designing communications and information-handling systems for disabled and elderly users. In: Snel J, Cremer R (eds) Work and aging: a European perspective London: Taylor and Francis Ltd, pp 173–195

  64. Rehabilitation Act 508 (1998) http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/act.htm

  65. Rice M, Fels D (2004) Low vision the visual interface for interactive television. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on interactive television: enhancing the experience, Brighton, UK, March-April 2004

  66. Rice M (2003) Television and visual impairment: the prospects for the accessibility of interactive television. In Stephanidis C (ed) Universal access in HCI: inclusive design in the information society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 800–804

    Google Scholar 

  67. RNIB (2002) RNIB’s response to the draft communications bill http://www.communicationsbill.gov.uk/responses/RNIB.doc. Cited 2004

  68. Root J (1986) Open the box. Comedia Publishing Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sandhu J (1993) Design for the elderly: User-based evaluation studies involving elderly users with special needs. Special Issue: Designing for our future selves. Appl Ergono 24(1):30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Silverstone R, Hirch E, Morley D (1992) Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In: Silverstone R, Hirch E (eds) Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces, pp 15–31

  71. Schroder K, Kirsten D, Kline S, Murray C (2003) Researching audiences. Arnold Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sloan M (2001) Web Accessibility and the DDA. In: Paliwala A, Moreton J (eds) The journal of information, law and technology (JILT) 2001 (2). Available at: http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-2/sloan.html. Cited 2004

  73. Sloan D, Gregor P, Rowan M and Booth P (2000) Accessible accessibility. In: Proceedings of the First ACM conference on universal usability (CUU 2000), Arlington

  74. Smith DDB, (1990) Human factors and aging: An overview of research needs and application opportunities. Hum Factors 32(5):509–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Stanton N (1998) Human factors in consumer products. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  76. Swedlow T (2000) Interactive enhanced television: An historical and critical perceptive. InteractiveTV Today http://www.itvt.com/etvwhitepaper.html. Cited 2004

  77. User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (2002) http://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG10

  78. Waddell C (2004) Letter to the editor regarding the Southwest Airlines Accessible Web Case. International center for disability resources on the internet. Retrieved 30th June 2005 from the ICDRI web site: http://www.icdri.org/CynthiaW/eaccess_SWAir.htm.

  79. Web Accessibility Initiative (2004) http://www.w3.org/WAI. Cited 2004

  80. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (1999) http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10

  81. Web Standards Project (2004) http://www.webstandards.org. Cited 2004

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Applied Computing, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK

    Alex Carmichael, Mark Rice, David Sloan & Peter Gregor

Authors
  1. Alex Carmichael
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Rice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Sloan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Gregor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Carmichael.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmichael, A., Rice, M., Sloan, D. et al. Digital switchover or digital divide: a prognosis for usable and accessible interactive digital television in the UK. Univ Access Inf Soc 4, 400–416 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0004-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-005-0004-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation