Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pragmatic research issues confronting HCI practitioners when designing for universal access

  • LONG PAPER
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many HCI products exclude potential users unnecessarily. Such exclusion often arises because of a mismatch between designers’ perceptions of the wants and needs of the end-user and their actual wants and needs. Sometimes the mismatch originates from the designer being unaware of the need to design inclusively, or of methods for implementing inclusive design. Other times the mismatch comes from the commissioner of the design, for example the client of a design consultancy. If the design commissioner specifies a target socio-economic group, but does not explicitly recognise that the group consists of users of varying functional capabilities, then the designers will often be given a design brief that overlooks the need to address the wider range of users, beyond simply the able-bodied. In either case, for universal access to be achieved effectively, information is required to identify the need for inclusive design and thus to generate demand, and design guidance is needed to help designers make inclusive design a reality. Currently, that information is largely unavailable to designers in an appropriate off-the-shelf format. This paper investigates methods for researchers to provide the kind of information that HCI designers need to design for universal access. It focuses on the profiling, recruitment and selection of users, along with the interpretation of the data gathered. In many instances, the HCI designer may also be the person performing the research, where specialist researchers are not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ADA: Americans with disabilities act of 1990, US Public Law, pp. 101–336 (1990)

  2. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)

  3. Cassim, J.: Crossmarket product and service innovation—the DBA design challenge example. In: Keates, S., et al. (eds.) Design for a More Inclusive World, pp. 11–20. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2004)

  4. Chin, D.N.: Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Model. User Adapt. Interact. 11(1–2), 181–194 (2000)

  5. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, Erlbaum (1988)

  6. Coleman, R.: A demographic overview of the ageing of first world populations. Appl. Ergon. 24(1), 5–8 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum. SAMS Publishing, Indianapolis (1999)

  8. DDA: The disability discrimination act. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE), UK (1995)

  9. Dong, H., Cardoso, C., Cassim, J., Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Inclusive design: reflections on design practice. Cambridge University Engineering Department Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR118 (2002)

  10. DTI: A study on the difficulties disabled people have when using everyday consumer products. Government Consumer Safety Research, Department of Trade and Industry, UK (2000)

  11. Gheerawo, R.R., Lebbon, C.S.: Inclusive design—developing theory through practice. In: Keates, S., et al. (eds.) Universal Access and Assistive Technology, pp. 43–52. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2002)

  12. Grundy, E., Ahlburg, D., Ali, M., Breeze, E., Sloggett, A.: Disability in Great Britain. Department of Social Security, Research Report No. 94, Corporate Document Series (1999)

  13. Horstmann, H.M.: Quantitative modeling in augmentative communication—a case study. In: Proceedings of RESNA ‘90 (Washington, DC, 1990), Resna Press, Washington, pp. 9–10 (1990)

  14. Horstmann , H.M., Levine, S.P.: The effectiveness of word prediction. In: Proceedings of RESNA ‘91 (Kansas City, Missouri, 1991), pp. 100–102. Resna Press, Washington (1991)

  15. Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J., Robinson, P.: User models and user physical capability. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12(2–3), 139–169 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2003)

  17. Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Countering design exclusion: bridging the gap between usability and accessibility. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2(3), 215–225 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Assessing the accessibility of digital television set-top boxes. In: Keates, S., et al. (eds.) Designing a More Inclusive World, pp. 183–192. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, (2004)

  19. Kirsch, N.L., Levine, S.P., Horstmann, H.M.: The effects of cognitive impairment on performance with assistive technologies. In: Proceedings of RESNA ‘92 (Toronto, Canada, 1992), pp. 165–167. Resna Press, Washington (1992)

  20. Martin, J., Meltzer, H., Elliot, D.: OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. In: Report 1: The Prevalence of Disability among Adults. HMSO, London (1988)

  21. Myerson, J.: IDEO—Masters of Innovation. Laurence King, London (2001)

  22. Newell, A.F., Arnott, J.L., Waller, A.: On the validity of user modelling in AAC: comments on Horstmann and Levine. In: Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Decker Periodicals Inc, 8:89–92 (1992)

  23. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

  24. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)

  25. Peebles, L., Norris, B.: Adultdata: The Handbook of Adult Anthropometric and Strength Measurements—Data for Design Safety. Department of Trade and Industry, UK (1998)

  26. Pfeiffer, D.: The philosophical foundation of disability studies. Disabil. Stud. Q. 22(2), 3–23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pirkl, J.: Transgenerational Design: Products for an Aging Population. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NewYork (1993)

  28. Popovic, V.: Product evaluation methods and their importance in designing interactive artefacts. In: Human Factors in Product Design, pp. 26–35. Taylor and Francis, London (1999)

  29. Smith, S., Norris, B., Peebles, L.: Older Adultdata: The Handbook of Measurements and Capabilities of the Older Adult—data for design safety. Department of Trade and Industry, UK (2000)

  30. Stanton, N., Young, M.: Is utility in the eye of the beholder? A study of ergonomic methods. Appl. Ergon. 29(1), 41–54 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stephanidis, C.: Designing for all in the Information Society: challenges towards universal access in the information age, pp. 21–24. In: ERCIM ICST Research Report (1999)

  32. Sutcliffe, A.G., Carroll, J.M.: Designing claims for reuse in interactive systems design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 50(3), 213–241 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. WHO: Health interview surveys: towards international harmonisation of methods and instruments. WHO Regional Publications, European Series No. 58, Copnhagen, Denmark (1996)

  34. WHO: International classification of impairment, disability and heath (ICF). World Health Organisation, Geneva (2001)

  35. WIA: Workforce Investment Act of 1998, US Public Law 105–220 (1998)

  36. Wilson, J., Corlett, N.: Evaluation of Human Work. Taylor and Francis, London (1995)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, NY, 10532, USA

    Simeon Keates

Authors
  1. Simeon Keates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simeon Keates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keates, S. Pragmatic research issues confronting HCI practitioners when designing for universal access. Univ Access Inf Soc 5, 269–278 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0050-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0050-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation