Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How people use presentation to search for a link: expanding the understanding of accessibility on the Web

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that many Web pages are difficult to use for visually disabled people. Without access to a rich visual display, the intended structure and organisation of the page is obscured. To fully understand what is missing from the experience of visually disabled users, it is pertinent to ask how the presentation of Web pages on a standard display makes them easier for sighted people to use. This paper reports on an exploratory eye tracking study that addresses this issue by investigating how sighted readers use the presentation of the BBC News Web page to search for a link. The standard page presentation is compared with a “text-only” version, demonstrating both qualitatively and quantitatively that the removal of the intended presentation alters “reading” behaviours. The demonstration that the presentation of information assists task completion suggests that it should be re-introduced to non-visual presentations if the Web is to become more accessible. The conducted study also explored the extent to which algorithms that generate maps of what is perceptually salient on a page match the gaze data recorded in the eye tracking study. The correspondence between a page’s presentation, knowledge of what is visually salient, and how people use these features to complete a task might offer an opportunity to re-model a Web page to maximise access to its most important parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/betsie/

  2. The full size webpage stimuli, gaze plots and heat maps are available at http://aig.cs.man.ac.uk/research/attention/attention.php

References

  1. Asakawa C., Itoh T.: User interface of a home page reader. In: ASSETS’98, pp. 149–156. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asakawa C., Takagi H.: Annotation-based transcoding for nonvisual Web access. In: ASSETS’00, pp. 172–179. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Goble C.A., Harper S., Stevens R.D.: The travails of visually impaired Web travelers. In: ACM 2000 Hypertext (Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia), pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I.: Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (1999)

  5. Coyne K.P., Nielsen J.: Beyond ALT Text Making the Web Easy to Use for Users with Disabilities. Nielson Norman Group, Fremont (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Disability Rights Commission: The Web access and inclusion for disabled people. Technical report, Disability Rights Commission (DRC), UK (2004)

  7. Hanson, V.L.: The user experience designs and adaptations. In: Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., Goble, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web Accessibility, pp. 1–11 (2004)

  8. Henter-Joyce, Inc. Jaws

  9. Joachims T., Granka L., Gay G.: Eye-tracking analysis of user behaviour in www search. In: SIGR’04, pp. 478–479. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tholke, A., Schiessl, M., Duda, S., Fischer, R.: Eye tracking and its application in usability and media research. In: MMI-Interactiv ‘03, pp. 41–50 (2003)

  11. McCarthy, J., Sasse, A., Riegelsberger, J.: Could I have a menu please? an eye tracking study of design conventions. In: Proceedings of HCI2003, pp. 401–414 (2003)

  12. Pan B., Hembrooke H.A., Gay G.K., Granka L.A., Feusner M.K., Newman J.K.: The determinants of Web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study. In: Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research and Applications, pp. 147–154. ACM Press, San Antonio (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pirolli P.L., Card S.K., Van Der Wege M.: Visual information foraging in a focus + context visualization. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2001), pp. 506–513. ACM Press, Seattle (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rayner K.: Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol. Bull., pp. 372–422 (1998)

  15. Regan, B.: Accessibility and design a failure of the imagination. In: Harper, S. Yesilada, Y. and Goble, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility, pp. 29–37 (2004)

  16. Russell, M.: Using eye-tracking data to understand first impressions of a Website. Usability News 7.2 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens, R.D., Edwards, A.D.N., Harling, P.A.: Access to mathematics for visually disabled students through multi-modal interaction. Human-Computer Interaction (Special issue on Multimodal Interfaces), pp. 47–92 (1997)

  18. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., Maeda, J.: Accessibility designer visualizing usability for the blind. In: ASSETS’04, pp. 177–184 (2004)

  19. Thatcher, J., Bohman, P., Burks, M., Henry, S.L., Regan, B., Swierenga, S., Urban, M.D., Waddell, C.D.: Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshaus (2002)

  20. Wright, P.: The psychology of layout: consequences of the visual structure of documents. In: Power, R., Scott, D. (eds.) American Association for Artificial Intelligence Technical Report FS–99-04, pp. 1–9. AAAI Press (1999)

  21. Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: Screen readers cannot see (ontology based semantic annotation for visually impaired Web travellers). In: Koch, N., Fraternali, P., Wirsing, M. (eds.) Web Engineering - 4th International Conference, ICWE (2004) Proceedings (LNCS 3140), pp. 445–458. Springer (2004)

  22. Yesilada , Y., Stevens, R., Goble, C.: A foundation for tool based mobility support for visually impaired Web users. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference (2003)

  23. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E.: A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, pp. 1254–1259 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Longhurst, P., Debattista, K., Chalmers, A.: Snapshot: a rapid technique for driving a selective global illumination renderer. Winter Conference on Computer Graphics (WSCG) 2005 (2005)

  25. Sundstedt, V., Debattista, K., Longhurst, P., Chalmers, A., Troscianko, T.: Visual attention for efficient high-fidelity graphics. Spring Conference on Computer Graphics SCCG 2005, pp.162–168 (2005)

  26. Raman T.V.: Emacspeak—direct speech access. In: ASSETS’96, pp. 32–36. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zajicek, M., Powell, C., Reeves, C.: Evaluation of a World Wide Web scanning interface for blind and visually impaired users. In: HCI ‘99, vol. 2, pp. 980–984 (1999)

  28. pwWebSpeak. http://www.soundlinks.com/pwgen.htm

  29. Pontelli E., Gillan D., Xiong W., Saad E., Gupta G., Karshmer A.I.: Navigation of HTML tables, frames, and XML fragments. In: ASSETS’02, pp. 25–32. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yesilada Y., Stevens R., Goble C., Hussein S.: Rendering tables in audio: the interaction of structure and reading styles. In ASSETs’04. pp. 16–23. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brown A., Pettifer S., Stevens R.: Evaluation of a non-visual molecule browser. In: ASSETS’04. pp. 40–47. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fredj, Z.B., Duce, D.A.: GraSSML: accessible smart schematic diagrams for all. W4A: Proceedings of the 2006 International Cross- Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, pp. 57–60 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Caroline Jay is funded by EPSRC grant EP/D036518/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

    Caroline Jay, Robert Stevens & Mashhuda Glencross

  2. International Manufacturing Centre, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

    Alan Chalmers

  3. University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, 8 1TH, UK

    Cathy Yang

Authors
  1. Caroline Jay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mashhuda Glencross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alan Chalmers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cathy Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Jay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jay, C., Stevens, R., Glencross, M. et al. How people use presentation to search for a link: expanding the understanding of accessibility on the Web. Univ Access Inf Soc 6, 307–320 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0089-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-007-0089-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation