Abstract
This paper describes a technique using dimensional analysis that so far has been rarely, if ever, used in studies of universal access. However, this procedure can produce a robust decision support process for inclusive designs. In this paper, it is applied to a case study of a wheelchair robot computer interface with choices in data input methods, addressing disparate requirements of different groups of intended users. The main underlying issue is to combine technical measurements, speed of operation and cost with subjective opinion. It turns out that Braglia’s method has greater robustness in determining rank compared to standard techniques. In this, case a simple switch was rated better than a mouse or voice operation for control.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25b56/25b5637045834cb6ef172e0d4048ab6aa4026315" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5217b/5217beaf97bfe8d84fc1e1e7fe1e8de9621beb2d" alt=""
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C :
-
Cost
- DG:
-
Dimensionless group
- F1:
-
Feature
- PI:
-
Performance index
- i :
-
Running index
- n :
-
Number of variables
- N c :
-
Non-dimensional cost
- N i :
-
Non-dimensional value for ith rating of device j
- S i :
-
Standard value of attribute i for device j
- V i :
-
Value attributed to ith rating for device j
- w i :
-
Weight i
- W :
-
Sum of individual weights
- X i :
-
Attribute i for device j
- Y i :
-
Attibute i for different device
References
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface, 4th edn. Pearson, New Jersey (2005)
Gulliksen, J., Harker, S.: The software accessibility of human–computer interfaces-ISO Technical Specification 16071. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 6–16 (2004)
Jacko, J., Hanson, V.: Universal access and inclusion in design. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2, 1–2 (2002)
Eisma, R., Dickenson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., Newell, A.F.: Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 131–140 (2004)
Brajnik, G.: Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3, 252–263 (2004)
Emiliani, P.L., Stephanidis, C.: Universal access to ambient intelligent environments: opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM J. 44(3), 605–619 (2005)
Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A.: Universal access in the information society: methods, tools and interaction technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 1(1), 40–55 (2001). (Managing Editor: Reinhard Oppermann, GMD, Germany)
Stephanidis, C.: Adaptive techniques for universal access. User modell. User Adapt. Interac. Int. J. 11(1/2), 159–179 (2001)
Braglia, M., Gabbrielli, R.: Dimensional analysis for investment selection in industrial robots. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(18), 4843–4848 (2000)
Wickens, C.D., Lee, J.D., Lui, Y., Gordon Becker, S.: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson, New Jersey (2004)
Bates, R., Istance, H.O.: Why are eye mice unpopular? A detailed comparison of head and eye controlled assistive technology pointing devices. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2, 280–290 (2003)
Parsons, B., White, A.S., Warner, P.: Validation methods for an accessible user interface for a rehabilitation robot, UAIS, vol. 5(3), October, pp. 306–324. ISSN 1615–5289 (2006)
Sears, A., Lin, M., Karimullah, A.S.: Speech-based cursor control: understanding the effects of target size, cursor speed, and command selection. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 2, 30–43 (2002)
De St, Q., Isaacson, E.M.: Dimensional Methods in Engineering and Physics. Edward Arnold, London (1975)
Rayleigh, (Lord), J. W. S.: On the viscosity of argon as affected by temperature. Proc. R. Soc. LXVI, pp. 68–74 (1899)
Buckingham, E.: On physically similar systems: illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Phys. Rev. IV(4), 418–432 (1914)
Langhaar, H.L.: Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models. Wiley, London (1967)
Staicu, C.I.: General dimensional analysis. J. Franklin Inst. 292(6), 433–439 (1971)
Parsons, B.N.: The design and evaluation of an interface and control system for a scariculated rehabilitation robot arm. Ph.D Thesis, School of Engineering Systems, Middlesex University (2001)
Prior, S.D.: An electric wheelchair-mounted robotic arm—a survey of potential users. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 14(4), 143–154 (1990)
Goh, C., Tung, Y.A., Cheng, C.: A revised weighted sum decision model for robot selection. Comp. Ind. Eng. 30(2), 193–199 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, A.S., Adams, R. & Prior, S. Evaluating choice in universal access: an example from rehabilitation robotics. Univ Access Inf Soc 8, 155–163 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0140-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-008-0140-1