Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A mobile instructional pervasive game method for language learning

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a mobile instructional pervasive game (M-IPG) learning method is proposed for improving students’ learning achievements with respect to vocabulary, grammar, reading, and writing. An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in an EFL course at a university school. A total of 137 university students participated in the experiment, 67 of whom were assigned to the experimental group and followed with the M-IPG approach, whilst 70 students were in the control group and was taught with the mobile inquiry-based instruction. From the empirical obtained, it was found that the proposed approach could effectively promote students’ learning achievement, as well as decrease their cognitive load of learning and perceptions of the use of M-IPG learning. It was found from the interviews that most of the participants perceived the M-IPG learning method to be a stimulating though challenging learning task that facilitated them in improving their location-based learning in the aspects of language learning and practice, learning contents recall, and confidence in using the language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, L.K., Crossley, S.A., Snow, E.L., McNamara, D.S.: L2 writing practice: game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Lang. Learn. Technol. 18(2), 124–150 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, C., Shih, J.L., Chang, C.K.: Meta-model for english language learning in instructional pervasive game. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Education, Psychology, and Social Science (ICEPS 2014), 2014 June. The Grand Hotel, Taiwan (2014).

  3. Chen, C.P., Shih, J.L., Ma, Y.C.: Using instructional pervasive game for school children’s cultural learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(2), 169–182 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chik, A.: Naturalistic CALL and digital gaming. TESOL Q. 47(4), 834–839 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chik, A.: Learner autonomy development through digital gameplay. J. Dig. Cult. Educ. 3(1), 30–45 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Driver, P.: Pervasive games and mobile technologies for embodied language learning. Int. J. Comput.-Assist. Lang. Learn. Teach. (IJCALLT) 2(4), 50–63 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, R.: Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gentes, A., Guyot-Mbodji, A., Demeure, I.: Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design. Multimed. Syst. 16(1), 43–55 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Godwin-Jones, R.: Games in language learning: opportunities and challenges. Lang. Learn. Technol. 18(2), 9–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holden, C., Sykes, J.: Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. (IJGBL) 1(2), 122 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, G.J., Yang, L.H., Wang, S.Y.: A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Comput. Educ. 69, 121–130 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, D. Pedagogical dimensions of game playing. ACM Intell. Mag. 10(1), 9–10 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Laine, T.H., Sedano, C.A.I., Joy, M., Sutinen, E.: Critical factors for technology integration in game-based pervasive learning spaces. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3(4), 294–306 (2010). doi:10.1109/tlt.2010.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McFarlance, A., Sparrowhawk, A., Heald, Y.: Report on the Educational Use of Games: An Exploration by TEEM of the Contribution Which Games Can Make to Education Process. TEEM, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McMahon, M., Henderson, S.: Enhancing nutritional learning outcomes within a simulation and pervasive game-based strategy. In: Bastiaens, T., Ebner, M. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2011 (pp. 3599–3604). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2011).

  16. Montola, M.: A ludological view on the pervasive mixed-reality game research paradigm. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 15(1), 3–12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunan, D.: Task-based syllabus design: selecting, grading and sequencing tasks. In: Crookes, G., Gass, S.M. (eds.) Tasks in a Pedagogical Context, pp. 55–68. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nieuwdorp, E.: The pervasive discourse: an analysis. Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 5(2), 13 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paas, F., Renkel, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instr. Sci. 32, 1–8 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ. Psychol. 38(1), 1–4 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Papastergiou, M.: Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput. Educ. 52(1), 1–12 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pegrum, M.: Mobile Learning: Languages, Literacies and Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinhardt, J., Sykes, J.: Conceptualizing digital game-mediated L2 learning and pedagogy: game-enhanced and game-based research and practice. In: Reinders, H. (ed.) Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 32–49. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwabe, G., Göth, C.: Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 21(3), 204–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Samuda, V., Bygate, M.: Tasks in Second Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Sung, Y.T., Chang, K.E., Lee, M.D.: Designing multimedia games for young children’s taxonomic concept development. Comput. Educ. 50(3), 1037–1051 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J., Paas, F.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10(3), 251–296 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shih, J.L., Chuang, C.W., Hwang, G.J.: An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(4), 50–62 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sylvén, L.K., Sundqvist, P.: Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL 24(3), 302–321 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sykes, J.: Affective gaming: advancing the argument for game-based learning. In: Pivec, M. (ed.) Affective and Emotional Aspects of Human–Computer Interaction: Game-Based and Innovative Learning Approaches, pp. 3–7. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tai, Y.: Contextualizing a MALL: practice design and evaluation. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(2), 220–230 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Walther, B.K.: Notes on the methodology of pervasive gaming. In: Kishino, F., Kitamura, Y., Kato, H., Nagata, N. (eds.) Entertainment Computing—ICEC 2005 (vol. 3711, pp. 488–495). Sanda, Japan.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching Chang.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 7.

Table 7 Three stages for implementing the learning task for the two groups

Appendix 2

See Table 8.

Table 8 Examples of learning content (sample)

Appendix 3: Interview questions

  1. 1.

    What are the advantages of the M-IPG task in comparison with the classroom-based TBL instruction you have experienced? Why?

  2. 2.

    What are the disadvantages of the M-IPG task in comparison with the classroom-based TBL instruction you have experienced? Why?

  3. 3.

    Would you prefer to learn with this approach for other language courses in the future? Why or why not?

  4. 4.

    Do you have any suggestions that might improve the learning task?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, C., Shih, JL. & Chang, CK. A mobile instructional pervasive game method for language learning. Univ Access Inf Soc 16, 653–665 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0496-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0496-6

Keywords

Navigation