Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive assessment for motor and visually impaired people using a hierarchical model

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of various modern technologies has inspired researchers to assess the effectiveness of these technologies for people with diversified disabilities. In this article, a comprehensive and effective assessment method for motor and visually impaired people has been accomplished using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). In the first phase, the proposed evaluation is based on the comparative judgment of the clinical experts using the AHP rating scale. In the second phase, the evaluation is authenticated by incorporating user judgment scores based on multi-weighted scoring model (MWSM). The MWSM output values are then converted to the AHP scale. The AHP algorithm is applied on the basis of average scores obtained from both evaluations. The technique successfully explores the essential, supporting and optional technologies for various people with disabilities (PwD) as well as identifying the criteria weight used for assessing research articles and existing solutions. Moreover, the assessment criteria are used by MWSM to assess research papers related to motor and visual impairment conditions. The assessment techniques have successfully identified the relevant criteria that can be used to assess technological research papers. It also reports the suitability of the various technological solutions and explores the limitations of the designed technological solutions for PwDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillison, D.K.: Rapid prototyping machine selection programme. In: 6th European Conference on Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing, Nottingham, UK (1997)

  2. Phamand, D.T., Gault, R.S.: A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38, 1257–1287 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 1–29 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B., Mukherjee, N.P.: Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD-AHP methodology. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 17(3), 332–350 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B., Mukherjee, N.P.: Rapid tooling manufacturability evaluation using fuzzy-AHP methodology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(5), 1161–1181 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, C.W., Kwak, N.K.: Information resource planning for a health-care system using an AHP-based goal programming method. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 50, 1191–1198 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Singpurwalla, N., Forman, E., Zalkind, D.: Promoting shared health care decision making using the analytic hierarchy process. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 33(4), 277–299 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forgionne, G.A., Kohli, R.: A multi-criteria assessment of decision technology system and journal quality. Inf. Manag. 38(7), 421–435 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tadisina, S.K., Troutt, M.D., Bhasin, V.: Selecting a doctoral programme using the analytic hierarchy process—the importance of perspective. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42, 631–638 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Byun, D.H.: The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Inf. Manag. 38(5), 289–297 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z.: Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16(6), 382–394 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, P.T., Yu-Ting, L.: Modelling of job-shop scheduling with multiple quantitative and qualitative objectives and a GA/TS mixture approach. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 14(4), 367–384 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hersh, M.A.: The Design and evaluation of assistive technology products and devices part 3: outcomes of assistive product use. In: Stone, J.H., Blouin, M. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation (2010). http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/312/

  14. Day, H., Jutai, J., Campbell, K.A.: Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil. Rehabil. 24, 31–37 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuhrer, M.J., Jutai, J.W., Schererand, M.J., Deruyter, F.: A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil. Rehabil. 25(22), 1243–1251 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelderblom, G.J., de Witteand, L.P., Wessels, R.D.: European instruments for assistive technology outcome assessment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, pp 777–781, ICCHP 2002 Linz, Austria, 15–20 July, 2002. doi:10.1007/3-540-45491-8_154

  17. Kbar, G., Bhatia, A., Abidi, M.H., Alsharawy, I.: Assistive technologies for hearing, and speaking impaired people: a survey. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. (2016). doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1129456

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ho, W.: Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 186(1), 211–228 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L.: The ANALYTIC Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguese, and Chinese, Revised editions, Paperback (1996, 2000), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1980)

  20. Anacan, R., Alcayde, J.G., Antegra, R., Luna, L.: Eye-GUIDE (Eye-gaze user interface design) messaging for physically-impaired people. Int. J. Distrib. Parallel Syst. (IJDPS) 4(1), 41 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Strassel, S.,Miller, D., Walker, K., Cieri, C.: Shared resources for robust speech-to-text technology. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Geneva, 2003

  22. Yella Reddy, G., Reddy, M.R.: Design of ultrasonic spectacles, flex sensor based voice generation and speech to text (Data) conversion techniques for physically disable people. Int. J. Res. Electron. Commun. Eng. 1(2), 12–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peixoto, N., Nik, H.G., Charkhkar, H.: Voice controlled wheelchairs: fine control by humming. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 112, 156–165 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omar, C., Akce, A., Johnson, M., Bretl, T., Maclin, E., McCormick, M., Coleman, T.P.: A Feedback Information-theoretic approach to the design of brain-computer interfaces. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 27(1), 5–23 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deshpande, S., Betke, M.: RefLink: an interface that enables people with motion impairments to analyze web content and dynamically link to references. Technical Report BUCS-TR-2009-008, Computer Science Department, Boston University, 11 March, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2144/1732. Accessed 2 Jan 2016

  26. Connor, C., Yu, E., Magee, J., Cansizoglu, E., Epstein, S., Betke, M.: Movement and recovery analysis of a mouse-replacement interface for users with severe disabilities. Univers. Access Hum.-Comput. Interact. 56, 493–502 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Betke, M., Mullally, W., Magee, J.: Active detection of eye scleras in real time. In: Proceedings of Human Modeling, Analysis and Synthesis, IEEE CVPR Workshop, June, 2000

  28. Magee, J., Betke, M.: HAIL: hierarchical adaptive interface layout. In: Proceedings of International conference on Computers helping people, vol. 1, pp. 139–146. Berlin, 2010

  29. Magee, J., Chennamaneni, Z.H., Epstein, S., Diane, H.T., Betke, M.: Towards a multi-camera mouse-replacement interface. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop of Pattern Recognition in Information Systems, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 8–12 June, 2010

  30. Yang, C.H., Huang, H.C., Chuang, L.Y., Yang, C.H.: A mobile communication aid system for persons with physical disabilities. Math. Comput. Model. 47, 318–327 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Krishnamurthy, G., Ghovanloo, M.: Tongue drive: a tongue operated magnetic sensor based wireless assistive technology for people with severe disabilities. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium of Circuits and Systems, pp. 5551–5554. Greece, 21–24 May 2006

  32. Gautam, G., Sumanth, G., Karthikeyan, K.C., Sundar, S., Venkataraman, D.: Eye movement based electronic wheel chair for physically challenged persons. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 3(1), 206–212 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Renteria, A., Dominguez, A., Muñoz, J.A., Lorente, J.L.: Mobile systems for guidance of dependent people: integration of user requirements and location based services. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Haptimap Pervasive, Finland, 2010

  34. Zhang, Q., Gollakota, S., Taskar, B., and Rao, R.P.N.: Non-intrusive tongue machine interface. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2555–2558. Toronto, Canada, 2014

  35. Rabiner, R.L.: A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE 77(2), 257–286 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Harper, S., Yesilada, Y., Chen, T.: Mobile device impairment … similar problems, similar solutions? Beh. Inf. Technol. 30(5), 673–690 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Biswas, P., Robinson, P.: Evaluating interface layout for visually and mobility impaired users through simulation. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12(1), 1–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., Singh, N.N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., Alberti, G., Lang, R.: Two adults with multiple disabilities use a computer-aided telephone system to make phone calls independently. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32, 2330–2335 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shinoda, K., Watanabe, Y., Iwata, K., Liang, Y., Nakagawa, R., Furui, S.: Semi-synchronous speech and pen input for mobile user interfaces. Speech Commun. 53(3), 283–291 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kbar, G., Daraiseh, A., Aly, A., Abidi, M., Syed, M.: Assessment of technologies relevant for people with motor hearing and speaking impairment. IETE Technical Review, Apr 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (Grant No. 12-ELE3220–02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awais Ahmad Khan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 42 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A.A., Kbar, G.A. & Ahmad, N. Comprehensive assessment for motor and visually impaired people using a hierarchical model. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 147–160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0523-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0523-2

Keywords

Navigation