Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Accessibility of South African university websites

  • Communication
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s information age, many universities around the world utilize their websites as a key platform for interaction with various stakeholders. As a result, it is of crucial importance for these websites to be highly accessible so that they can be effectively used by all stakeholders. However, there has been growing evidence over the years indicating that most university websites are unable to meet accessibility criteria. This study had as objective to evaluate the accessibility of South African (SA) university websites. An accessibility evaluation of the homepages of all 26 SA university websites showed that none of the websites met all the WCAG 2.0 accessibility criteria. The websites violated an average of eight rules, of which many are fundamental Level A criteria that ideally must be addressed by all websites. Additionally, all the websites had broken links, while four of the websites failed the Google Mobile-friendly Test. These findings suggest the need for SA universities to devote the necessary financial and human resources to enhance the accessibility of their websites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Alahmadi, T., Drew, S.: Accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university websites in world, Oceania, and Arab categories for home, admission, and course description webpages. J. Open Flex. Distance Learn. 21(1), 7–24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, D., Rippon, S.: University website accessibility revisited (2007). Retrieved May 24, 2009 from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw07/papers/refereed/alexander/paper.html

  3. Al-Khalifa, H.S., Baazeem, I., Alamer, R.: Revisiting the accessibility of Saudi Arabia government websites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16, 1027–1039 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell, D., Carl, A., Swart, E.: Students with hearing impairment at a South African university: Self-identity and disclosure. Afr. J. Disabil. 5(1), a229 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradbard, D.A., Peters, C., Caneva, Y.: Web accessibility policies at land-grant universities. Internet High. Educ. 13, 258–266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doulani, A., Hariri, N., Rashidi, A.: Analysis of Iranian and British university websites by World Wide Web consortium. J. Scientometr. Res. 2, 74–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giraud, S., Thérouanne, P., Steiner, D.D.: Web accessibility: Filtering redundant and irrelevant information improves website usability for blind users. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 111, 23–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hackett, S., Parmano, B., Zeng, X.: A retrospective look at website accessibility over time. Behav. Inf. Technol. 24, 407–417 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harper, K.A., DeWaters, J.: A Quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. Internet High. Educ. 11, 160–164 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harper, S., Chen, A.: Web accessibility guidelines: A lesson from the evolving Web. World Wide Web 15(1), 61–88 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iseri, E.I., Uyar, K., Ilhan, U.: The accessibility of Cyprus Islands’ higher education institution websites. Procedia Comput. Sci. 120, 967–974 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.S.: Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamoun, F., Almourad, M.B.: Accessibility as an integral factor in e-government web site evaluation: the case of Dubai e-government. Inf. Technol. People 27(2), 208–228 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kane, S.K., Shulman, J.A., Shockley, T.J., Ladner, R.E.: A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4a) (Banff, Canada, May 07–08, 2007). W4A ‘07, vol. 225. ACM, New York (2007)

  16. Kaur, B., Jain, T.: Attracting customers’ to online shopping using mobile apps: A case study of indian market. In: Madan, S., Arora, J.B. (eds.) Securing Transactions and Payment Systems for M-Commerce. Business Science Reference, Hershey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kesswani, N., Kumar, S.: Accessibility analysis of websites of educational institutions. Perspect. Sci. 8, 210–212 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Korbel, D.M., Lucia, J.H., Wenzel, C.M., Anderson, B.G.: Collaboration strategies to facilitate successful transition of students with disabilities in a changing higher education environment. New Dir. High. Educ. 154, 17–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurt, S.: Accessibility of Turkish University Web sites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(1), 505–515 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurt, S.: The accessibility of university web sites: the case of Turkish universities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(1), 101–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mutanga, O.: Students with disabilities’ experience in South African higher education – a synthesis of literature. South Afr. J. High. Educ. 31(1), 135–154 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Osika, E., Johnson, R., Buteau, R.: Factors influencing faculty use of technology in online instruction: A case study. J. Distance Learn. Adm. 12(1), 1–12: (2009). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring121/osika121.html

  23. Qwerty Digital.: The digital landscape in South Africa 2017 (2017). http://qwertydigital.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Digital-Statistics-in-South-Africa-2017-Report.pdf

  24. Rana, M.M., Fakrudeen, M., Rana, U.: Evaluating web accessibility of university web sites in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Technol. Knowl. Soc. 7(3), 1–15 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ringlaben, R., Bray, M., Packard, A.: Accessibility of American university special education departments’ web sites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 13, 249–254 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmutz, S., Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J.: Implementing recommendations from web accessibility guidelines: A comparative study of nondisabled users and users with visual impairments. Hum. Factors 59(6), 956–972 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Verkijika, S.F.: Evaluating and improving the usability of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa for enhancing citizen adoption and usage. Ph.D. Thesis. University of the Free State, South Africa (2017). Retrieved Dec 17, 2017 from http://scholar.ufs.ac.za:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11660/7068/VerkijikaSF.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  28. Verkijika, S.F., De Wet, L.: Determining the accessibility of e-government websites in Sub-Saharan Africa against WCAG 2.0 standard. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. (IJEGR) 13(1), 52–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, vol. 2461124, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (2013)

  30. W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (2008). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

  31. W3C: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (2017). Retrieved Dec 15 2017 from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

  32. West, D.M.: State and federal electronic government in the United States (2008). Retrieved Jan 8 2018 from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/0826_egovernment_west.pdf

  33. Zap, N., Montgomerie, C.: The status of web accessibility of Canadian universities and colleges: A follow-up study 10 years later (2013). Retrieved Jan 18 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/112322/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Informatics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Silas Formunyuy Verkijika & Lizette De Wet

Authors
  1. Silas Formunyuy Verkijika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizette De Wet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silas Formunyuy Verkijika.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verkijika, S.F., De Wet, L. Accessibility of South African university websites. Univ Access Inf Soc 19, 201–210 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0632-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0632-6

Keywords