Abstract
In line with the upward trend of applying online video in education, this study examined factors influencing the behavioral intention of children to use video-sharing tools in an integrated elementary curriculum. A total of 222 children from Taiwan participated in this study, wherein a questionnaire survey extending a technology acceptance model was conducted to gather data after a cross-classroom video-sharing activity. Results showed that the three external factors of social presence, perception of enjoyment, and perception of visual attractiveness positively affect children’s behavior intention toward using video-sharing tools. The resultant joy and enhanced interest of this process will improve their learning experience and usage attitude. This study further examined the role of gender and digital divides in children’s adoption of video-sharing tools. The results of multigroup analysis revealed that perceived enjoyment is the dominant external predictor, especially for females and disadvantaged children. The implication of these three external factors and the influence of mobile devices are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chiu, T.K.F., Hew, T.K.F.: Factors influencing peer learning and performance in MOOC asynchronous online discussion forum. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 34, 16–28 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3240
Sun, Z., Lin, C.-H., Wu, M., Zhou, J., Luo, L.: A tale of two communication tools: discussion-forum and mobile instant-messaging apps in collaborative learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49, 248–261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12571
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education (2009). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
Lee, J., Yoon, S.Y., Lee, C.H.: Exploring online learning at primary schools: students’ perspectives on cyber home learning system through video conferencing (CHLS-VC). Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 12, 68–76 (2013)
Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Inkpen, K., Du, H., Johns, P.: Understanding children’s behavior in an asynchronous videomediated communication environment. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 1621–1629 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0525-2
Lowenthal, P., Borup, J., West, R., Archambault, L.: Thinking beyond Zoom: using asynchronous video to maintain connection and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Technol. Teach. Educ. 28, 383–391 (2020)
Lowenthal, P.R., Moore, R.L.: Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learn. 24, 28–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i4.2335
Stoszkowski, J.R.: Using Flipgrid to develop social learning. Compass J. Learn. Teach. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i2.786
Keiper, M.C., White, A., Carlson, C.D., Lupinek, J.M.: Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. J. Educ. Bus. 96, 343–351 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1832431
Miskam, N.N., Aminabibi, A., Saidalvi, S.: The use of flipgrid for teaching oral presentation skills to engineering students. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 8, 636–641 (2019)
Edwards, C.R., Lane, P.N.: Facilitating student interaction: the role of Flipgrid in blended language classrooms. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. Electron. J. 22, 26–39 (2021)
Green, T.D., Besser, E.D., Donovan, L.C.: More than amplifying voice and providing choice: educator perceptions of Flipgrid use in the classroom. TechTrends 65, 785–795 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00635-3
Batchelor, K.E., Cassidy, R.: The lost art of the book talk: what students want. Read. Teach. 73, 230–234 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1817
Colton, J.: Social, innovative and deep: exploring digital literacies in a year 9 English classroom. Chang. Engl. Stud. Cult. Educ. 27, 270–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1766946
Dousay, T.A., Weible, J.L.: Build-a-bug workshop: designing a learning experience with emerging technology to foster creativity. TechTrends 63, 41–52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0364-8
Hashim, H.U., Yunus, M.M., Hashim, H.: 3-minutes pitching with flip grid: an antidote of innovation for speaking anxiety. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 8, 1798–1801 (2019)
Johnson, L., McHugh, S., Eagle, J.L., Spires, H.A.: Project-based inquiry (PBI) global in kindergarten classroom: Inquiring about the world. Early Child. Educ. J. 47, 607–613 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00946-4
Chaka, C., Nkhobo, T.: Online module login data as a proxy measure of student engagement: the case of myUnisa, MoyaMA, Flipgrid, and Gephi at an ODeL institution in South Africa. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0167-9
Lam, C.N.C.: The use of mobile learning application in interview roleplay: a preliminary study. J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst. 12, 486–496 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I3/20201215
Mai, T.T.P., Wiest, G.M., Nguyen, N.D.: Asynchronous video-based discussion for the enhancement of intercultural competence among vietnamese non-english majors. CALL-EJ. 21, 159–174 (2020)
Serembus, J.F., Murphy, J.: Creating an engaging learning environment through video discussions. Nurse Educ. 45, 68–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000701
Stoszkowski, J., Hodgkinson, A., Collins, D.: Using Flipgrid to improve reflection: a collaborative online approach to coach development. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog. 26, 167–178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1789575
Spante, M., Karlsen, A.V., Nortvig, A.-M., Christiansen, R.B.: Cross-border collaboration in history among Nordic students: a case study about creating innovative ICT didactic models. IAFOR J. Educ. 2, 55–85 (2014)
Shin, J.L.K., Yunus, M.M.: The attitudes of pupils towards using Flipgrid in learning English speaking skills. Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 20, 151–168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.10
Marangunić, N., Granić, A.: Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 81–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Granić, A., Marangunić, N.: Technology acceptance model in educational context: a systematic literature review. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50, 2572–2593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., Kamaludin, A.: Technology acceptance model in m-learning context: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 125, 389–412 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Lai, P.C.: The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag. 14, 21–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43, 740–755 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27, 451–481 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46, 186 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39, 273–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Ghapanchi, A.H., Purarjomandlangrudi, A., McAndrew, A., Miao, Y.: Investigating the impact of space design, visual attractiveness and perceived instructor presence on student adoption of learning management systems. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 5053–5066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10204-5
Sarrab, M., Al Shibli, I., Badursha, N.: An empirical study of factors driving the adoption of mobile learning in Omani higher education. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 17, 331–349 (2016). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2614
Huang, Y.-M.: Exploring students’ acceptance of team messaging services: the roles of social presence and motivation. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 48, 1047–1061 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12468
Yi, Y., Wu, Z., Tung, L.L.: How individual differences influence technology usage behavior? Toward an integrated framework. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 46, 52–63 (2005)
Nagy, J.T.: Evaluation of online video usage and learning satisfaction: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19, 56 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886
Lemay, D.J., Morin, M.M., Bazelais, P., Doleck, T.: Modeling students’ perceptions of simulation-based learning using the technology acceptance model. Clin. Simul. Nurs. 20, 28–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.004
Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F.J., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez-Abad, J.C., Alegret, A.: An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments. Interact. Learn. Environ. 26, 895–910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1421560
van der Heijden, H.: Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Inf. Manag. 40, 541–549 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00079-4
Zhang, P., Zeng, Z., Pei, Z., Zhenxiang, Z.: A framework for personalized service website based on TAM. In: 2006 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management. pp. 1598–1603 (2006)
Zhang, P., Zeng, Z., Huang, C.: An extended TAM model for Chinese B2C websites design. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 10, 51–66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856438
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22, 1111–1132 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Alshammari, S.H., Ali, M.B., Rosli, M.S.: The influences of technical support, self efficacy and instructional design on the usage and acceptance of LMS: a comprehensive review. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. TOJET 15, 116–125 (2016)
Park, B., Chang, H., Park, S.: Adoption of digital devices for children education: Korean case. Telemat. Inform. 38, 247–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.002
Ibáñez, M.B., Serio, Á.D., Villarán, D., Delgado-Kloos, C.: The acceptance of learning augmented reality environments: a case study. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT). pp. 307–311 (2016)
Tsai, B.-Y., Yen, J.-N.: The influence of self-efficacies on readers’ intention to use e-reading devices: an empirical study. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 12, 41–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2014070104
Tsai, Y.-Y., Chao, C.-M., Lin, H.-M., Cheng, B.-W.: Nursing staff intentions to continuously use a blended e-learning system from an integrative perspective. Qual. Quant. 52, 2495–2513 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0540-5
Teo, T., Noyes, J.: An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling approach. Comput. Educ. 57, 1645–1653 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2011.03.002
Wu, X., Gao, Y.: Applying the extended technology acceptance model to the use of clickers in student learning: some evidence from macroeconomics classes. Am. J. Bus. Educ. 4, 43–50 (2011). https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v4i7.4674
Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., Chang, H.: Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: an application of extended technology acceptance model. Telemat. Inform. 31, 3–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.07.001
Hassanein, K., Head, M.: Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 689–708 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018
Shen, J.: Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 13, 198–212 (2012)
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS–SEM). SAGE Publications (2016)
Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., Kibelloh, M.: Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49, 111–132 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.1.e
Lin, P.C., Lu, H.K., Liu, S.C.: Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning systems: an extension of UTAUT. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 47, 1200–1207 (2013)
Pramana, E.: Determinants of the adoption of mobile learning systems among university students in Indonesia. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 17, 365–398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.28945/4119
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X.: Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: a structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 51, 163–184 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.2.b
Terzis, V., Economides, A.A.: Computer based assessment: gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 2108–2122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
Navarro, C.X., Molina, A.I., Redondo, M.A.: Factors influencing students’ acceptance in m-learning: a literature review and proposal of a taxonomy. In: 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE). pp. 1–6 (2016)
Education, M. of: curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Ministry of Education Taipei (2014)
Chou, Y.-C., Chiu, C.-H.: The development and validation of a digital fluency scale for preadolescents. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 29, 541–551 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00505-1
Hinkin, T.R.: A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J. Manag. 21, 967–988 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
OECD: are the new millennium learners making their grade? Technology use and educational performancein PISA 2006. Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris (2010)
Verhoeven, J.C., Heerwegh, D., De Wit, K.: ICT learning experience and research orientation as predictors of ICT skills and the ICT use of university students. Educ. Inf. Technol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9310-3
Chiao, C., Chiu, C.H.: The mediating effect of ICT usage on the relationship between students’ socioeconomic status and achievement. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 27, 109–121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0370-9
McBain, B., Drew, A., James, C., Phelan, L., Harris, K.M., Archer, J.: Student experience of oral communication assessment tasks online from a multi-disciplinary trial. Educ. Train. 58, 134–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2014-0124
Huang, Y.-M.: Exploring the factors that affect the intention to use collaborative technologies: the differing perspectives of sequential/global learners. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 31, 278–292 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1868
Huang, T.K.: Exploring the antecedents of screenshot-based interactions in the context of advanced computer software learning. Comput. Educ. 80, 95–107 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.011
Shin, D.-H.: Defining sociability and social presence in social TV. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 939–947 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.006
Quintana, S.M., Maxwell, S.E.: Implications of recent developments in structural equation modeling for counseling psychology. Couns. Psychol. 27, 485–527 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099274002
Hair, J.F., Jr., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L., Sarstedt, M.: PLS–SEM or CB–SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 1, 107–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.10008574
Lowry, P.B., Gaskin, J.: Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: when to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 57, 123–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
Dash, G., Paul, J.: CB–SEM vs PLS–SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 173, 121092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS–SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19, 139–152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Shackman, J.D.: The use of partial least squares path modeling and generalized structured component analysis in international business research: a literature review. Int. J. Manag. 30, 78 (2013)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. JMR 18, 39–50 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., Segars, A.H.: Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 18, 185–214 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Ketchen, D.J., Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Calantone, R.J.: Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods 17, 182–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Liu, M.-C., Ho, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-L.: Using a “prediction–observation–explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their Internet cognitive failure. Comput. Educ. 72, 110–120 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004
Li, Y., Ranieri, M.: Educational and social correlates of the digital divide for rural and urban children: a study on primary school students in a provincial city of China. Comput. Educ. 60, 197–209 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.001
Palczyńska, M., Rynko, M.: ICT skills measurement in social surveys: can we trust self-reports? Qual. Quant. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01031-4
Lee, H., Ahn, H., Nguyen, T.G., Choi, S.W., Kim, D.J.: Comparing the self-report and measured smartphone usage of college students: a pilot study. Psychiatr. Investig. 14, 198–204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.2.198
Grieger, K., Leontyev, A.: Promoting student awareness of green chemistry principles via student-generated presentation videos. J. Chem. Educ. 97, 2657–2663 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00639
Jeno, L.M., Vandvik, V., Eliassen, S., Grytnes, J.A.: Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: a self-determination theory approach. Comput. Educ. 128, 398–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under Grant No. MOST 109-2511-H-003-012-MY3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chiao, C., Chiu, CH. & Hu, HW. Factors influencing the intention of children to use video-sharing tools in elementary integrated curriculum. Univ Access Inf Soc 23, 1765–1778 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01002-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01002-0