Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of exchange and aggregation models in the B2B e-marketplace

  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research seeks to provide an economic framework for understanding two major forms of e-marketplaces: aggregation-oriented vs. exchange-oriented e-marketplaces. By analyzing the marginal benefit per transaction in alternative models, we are able to determine the most suitable B2B e-marketplace for a wide variety of product categories, market conditions, and procurement methods. For example, when companies sell commodities in a fragmented market, the aggregation model is suitable for spot purchasing, and the exchange model works best for systematic purchasing. In addition, the effect of supplier consolidation and information technology-enabled cost reduction on model selection is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakos Y (1991) A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS quarterly 15 (3): 295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos Y (1997) Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science 43 (12): 1672–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H, Shen S, Schlueter-Langdon C, Shaw M (2003) A Survey on the Industry Sponsored e-Marketplaces, In: Shaw M (ed) E-Business Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 277–310

  • Choi SC (1991) Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer Marketing Science 10(4): 271–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeuland AP, Shugan SM (1983) Managing Channel Profits. Marketing Science 2(3): 239–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan S, Sawhney M. (2000) E-Hubs: The New B2B Marketplaces. Harvard Business Review, May–June pp. 97–103.

  • Konsynski BR (1993) Strategic Control in the Extended Enterprise. IBM Systems Jounal 32 (1): 111–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Dissel H (1996) Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly September, pp. 279–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Sarvary M (1999) When and How is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition? Marketing Science 18(4): 485–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communication of the ACM 30: 484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TW, Staelin R (1983) An Industry Equilibrium Analysis of Downstream Vertical Integration. Marketing Science 2(2) Spring 161–191

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TW, Staelin R (1986) Channel Efficiency, Incentive Compatibility, Transfer, Pricing, and Market Structure: An Equilibrium Analysis of Channel Relationships. Research in Marketing: Distribution Channels and Institutions, 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 181–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy KS (1988) Strategic Decentralization in Channels. Marketing Science 7(4), Fall 335–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Sculley BA Woods WA (2000) B2B Exchange: The Killer Application in the Business-to-Business Internet Revolution, 1st Edition, ISI publications January

  • Trivedi M (1998) Distribution Channels: An Extension of Exclusive Retailership. Management Science 44(7): 896–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, HL., Easley, R.F. & Shaw, M.J. A comparative study of exchange and aggregation models in the B2B e-marketplace. ISeB 1, 213–228 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-003-0005-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-003-0005-3

Key words

Navigation