Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a theory of managing creativity-intensive processes: a creative industries study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an exploratory, theory-building study on the impact of creativity on business processes, their management, and the use of information technology (IT) in particular. The empirical evidence was derived from organizations within the creative industries, specifically film and visual effects (VFX) production. An adapted grounded theory approach was employed in order to analyze the data. The study identifies the dynamics of business processes that can be described as highly dependent on creativity, intensively involving the client, complex, and interdependent. It explains the processes’ organizational context as well as strategies and IT systems that organizations use in order to manage these processes. The study suggests that creativity-intensive processes are characterized by high levels of uncertainty with regard to outcome, process structure, and required resources. Creative organizations pursue both creative and operational process performance while simultaneously mitigating creative and operational risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 123–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1990) Within you, without you: the social psychology of creativity and beyond. In: Runco MA, Albert RS (eds) Theories of creativity. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 61–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity: Update to the “Social psychology of creativity”. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity. Harv Bus Rev 76(5):76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron F, Harrington DM (1981) Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annu Rev Psychol 32:439–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Goldstein DK, Mead M (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q 11(3):368–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghini S (2005) Organizational creativity: Breaking equilibrium and order to innovate. J Knowl Manag 9(4):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RT (1989) Creativity–what are we to measure? In: Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR (eds) Handbook of creativity. Perspectives on individual differences. Plenum Press, New York, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Macmillan Press, London, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Couger JD, Higgins LF (1993) (un)structured creativity in information systems organizations. MIS Q 17(4):375–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation. Reegnineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living: how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R (2001) Business process modelling with aris. A practical guide. Springer, Berlin

  • Davis H, Scase R (2000) Managing creativity. The dynamics of work and organization. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazin R, Glynn MA, Kazanjian R (1999) Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: a sensemaking perspective. Acad Manag Rev 24(2):286–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall G, Ryhammer L (1999) The creative climate: its determinants and effects at a swedish university. Creat Res J 12:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppler MJ, Seifried PM, Röpnack A (1999) Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium. In: SIGCPR 1999, New Orleans

  • Erl T (2004) Service-oriented architecture. A field guide to integrating xml and web services. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández W, Martin MA, Gregor S, Stern SE, Vitale M (2007) A multi-paradigm approach to grounded theory. In: Hart DN, Gregor SD (eds) Information systems foundations. Theory, representation and reality. ANU E-Press, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestien RL (1993) The power of product. In: Isaksen SG, Murdock MC, Firestien RL, Treffinger DJ (eds) Nurturing and developing creativity. The emergence of a discipline. Norwood, New Jersey, pp 261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford CM (1996) A theory of individual creativity in multiple social domains. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1112–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton F (1869) Hereditary genius. Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin B (1963) Automatism, intention, and autonomy in the novelist’s production. Daedalus 92(2):297–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP (1956) Structure of intellect. Psychol Bull 53(4):267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP (1967) The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford JP (1983) Transformation abilities or functions. J Creat Behav 17:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon P (2007) Business process change. A guide for business managers and bpm and six sigma professionals. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley J (2005) Creative industries–introduction. In: Hartley J (ed) Creative industries. Malden, USA, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh D (2002) The cultural industries. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung RY (2006) Business process management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Total Qual Manag 17(1):21–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen SG (ed) (1987) Frontiers of creativity research: beyond the basics. Bearly Limited, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellison C (2006) Producing for tv and video. Burlington, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • King N, Anderson N (1990) Innovation in working groups. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work. Wiley, Chichester, pp 81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q 23(1):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart TI (2001) Models of the creative process: past, present, and future. Creat Res J 13(3&4):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace M-A, Ward T (2002) Modeling the creative process: a grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creat Res J 14(2):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiden N, Robertson S, Gizikis A (2004) Provoking creativity: imagine what your requirements could be like. IEEE Software 21(5):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martindale C (1989) Personality, situation, and creativity. In: Glover JA, Ronning RR, Reynolds CR (eds) Handbook of creativity. Plenum Press, New York, pp 211–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman WL (1997) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 3rd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

  • Orlikowski WJ (1993) Case tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Q 17(3):309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf Syst Res 2(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘it’ in it research - a call to theorizing the it artifact. Inf Syst Res 12(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn AF (1957) Applied imagination. Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. The Creative Education Foundation Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne R (1990) The effectiveness of research teams: a review. In: West MA, Farr JL (eds) Innovation and creativity at work. Wiley, Chichester, pp 101–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry TS (1995) How small firms innovate: designing a culture for creativity. Res Technol Manag 38(2):14–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Sci 1(3):267–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell TC (1995) Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strateg Manag J 16(1):15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes M (1961) An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan 42:305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson DL, Runco MA (1992) The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas Psychol 10(2):131–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco MA (2007) Creativity. Theories and themes: research, development, and practice. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryhammer L, Smith GJW (1999) Creative and other personality functions as defined by percept-generic techniques and their relation to organizational conditions. Creat Res J 12(4):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker S, Lau F, Sahay S (2001) Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. ACM SIGMIS Database 32(1):38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer A-W, Thomas O, Adam O (2005) Process modeling using event-driven process chains. In: Dumas M, Aalst WMPVD, Hofstede AHMT (eds) Process-aware information systems. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonoton DK (1975) Age and literary creativity: a cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. J Cross Cult Psychol 6(3):259–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Styhre A, Sundgren M (2005) Managing creativity in organizations. Critique and practices. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan G (1998) Managing creativity in organizations: a total system approach. Creat Innov Manag 7(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart C (2001) An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues. In: Trauth EM (ed) Qualitative research in is: issues and trends. IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp 104–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart C (2007) The evolving nature of grounded theory method: The case of the information systems discipline. In: Charmaz K, Bryant A (eds) The handbook of grounded theory. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 311–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart C, Fernández W (2006) Grounded theory method: the researcher as blank slate and other myths. In: Twenty-seventh international conference on information systems, Milwaukee, pp 457–464

  • van der Aalst WMP, Weske M, Grünbauer D (2005) Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowl Eng 53(2):129–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas G (1926) The art of thought. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1995) Interpretive case studies in is research: nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4(2):74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams WM, Yang LT (1999) Organizational creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 373–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad Manag Rev 18(2):293–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Ramesh B (2007) Software process tailoring: an empirical investigation. J Manag Inf Syst 24(2):293–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Fuerst-Franz-Josef-Strasse 21, 9490, Vaduz, Principality of Liechtenstein

    Stefan Seidel

Authors
  1. Stefan Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Seidel.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 13.

Table 13 Overview of low level (open) codes that led to the formation of categories and properties
Full size table

Appendix 2

See Table 14.

Table 14 Overview of how categories contribute to propositions
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seidel, S. Toward a theory of managing creativity-intensive processes: a creative industries study. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 9, 407–446 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-009-0123-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-009-0123-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation