Abstract
In an age of cloud computing, mobile users, and wireless networks, the availability of decision support related computing resources can no longer guarantee five-nines (99.999%) availability. Since the dependence on decision support systems is ever increasing, obtaining accurate deterministic advice from these systems will become critical. This study proposes a probabilistic model that maps decision resource availability to correct decision outcomes. Grounded in system reliability theory, the probability functions are given and developed. The model is evaluated with a simulated decision opportunity and the outcome of the experimentation is quantified using a goodness of fit measure and ANOVA testing.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Ali AS, Rana O, Walker DW (2004) WS-QoC: measuring quality of service compliance. International conference on service oriented computing (ICSOC04), New York, NY, USA
Amaro H, Blake SM, Morrill AC, Cranston K, Logan J, Conron KJ, Dai J (2005) HIV prevention community planning: challenges and opportunities for data-informed decision-making. AIDS Behav 9(2):9–27
Begole JB, Matsakis NE, Tang JC (2004) Lilsys: sensing unavailability. ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. Chicago, USA
Belady CL (2007) In the data center, power and cooling costs more than IT equipment it supports. Electron Cooling Mag 13(1)
Bhagwan R, Savage S, Voelker G (2003) Understanding availability, peer-to-peer systems II (IPTPS 2003). Berkeley, USA, pp 256–267
Blake C, Rodrigues R (2003) High availability, scalable storage, dynamic peer networks: pick two. The 9th conference on hot topics in operating systems (HOTOS’03). USENIX association, Lihue, USA, pp 1–1
Briscoe G, Marinos A (2009) Digital ecosystems in the clouds: towards community cloud computing. Comput Res Repos (abs/0903.0694)
Brown A, Oppenheimer D, Keeton K, Thomas R, Kubiatowicz J, Patterson DA (1999) ISTORE: introspective storage for data-intensive network services. The IEEE seventh workshop on hot topics in operating systems, Rio Rico, USA, pp 32–37
Buyya R, Sulistio A (2008) Service and utility oriented distributed computing systems: challenges and opportunities for modeling and simulation communities. In: 41st annual simulation symposium (ANSS-41), Ottawa, Canada, pp 68–81
Carr NG (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harv Bus Rev 81(5):41
Chakraborty S, Yau DKY, Lui JCS, Dong Y (2006) On the effectiveness of movement prediction to reduce energy consumption in wireless communication. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 5(2):157–169
Chernoff H, Lehmann EL (1954) The use of maximum likelihood estimates in χ2 tests for goodness-of-fit. Ann Math Stat 25:579–586
Covin JG, Slevin DP, Heeley MB (2001) Strategic decision making in an intuitive vs. technocratic mode: structural and environmental considerations. J Bus Res 52(1):51–67
Dai YS, Xie M, Poh KL, Liu GQ (2003) A study of service reliability and availability for distributed systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 79(1):103–112
Danninger M, Kluge T, Stiefelhagen R (2006) MyConnector: analysis of context cues to predict human availability for communication. 8th International conference on multimodal interfaces, Banff, Canada
Fontanills GA, Gentile T (2001) The stock market course. Wiley, New York, USA
Henson V, Van de Ven A, Gud A, Brown Z (2006) Chunkfs: using divide-and-conquer to improve file system reliability and repair. In: Second workshop on hot topics in system dependability (HotDep ‘06), Seattle, USA
Horvitz E, Koch P, Kadie CM, Jacobs A (2002) Coordinate: probabilistic forecasting of presence and availability. The eighteenth conference on uncertainty and artificial intelligence, Edmonton, Canada, pp 224–233
Ibach P, Horbank M (2004) Highly available location-based services in mobile environments. International service availability symposium, Munich, Germany
Keh HT, Xie Y (2008) Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: the roles of trust, identification and commitment. Ind Marketing Manag 38(7):732–742
Loyall JP, Schantz RE, Zinky JA, Bakken DE (1998) Specifying and measuring quality of service in distributed object systems. First international symposium on object-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC ‘98), Kyoto, Japan
Menasce DA (2004) Composing web services: a QoS view. IEEE Internet Comput 8(06):88–90
Mikic-Rakic M, Malek S, Medvidovic N (2005) Improving availability in large, distributed component-based systems via redeployment. In: Dearle A, Eisenbach S (eds) Component deployment, LNCS, vol 3798. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 83–98
Muhlenbrock M, Brdiczka O, Snowdon D, Meunier JL (2004) Learning to detect user activity and availability from a variety of sensor data. Second IEEE annual conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom 2004), Orlando, FL, USA, pp 13–22
Odronia CG (2009) Broadband fuels social-networking growth. The Manila Times, Manila, Phillipines
Peer J (2005) Web service composition as AI planning—a survey. Technical report, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland
Pistore M, Barbon F, Bertoli P, Shaparau D, Traverso P (2004) Planning and monitoring web service composition. In: Proceedings of the second ICAPS international workshop on planning and scheduling for web and grid services. British Columbia, Canada, pp 70–77
Plackett RL (1983) Karl Pearson and the chi-squared test. Int Stat Rev 51(1):59–72
Rahmati A, Zhong L (2007) Context-for-wireless: context-sensitive energy-efficient wireless data transfer. 5th International conference on mobile systems, applications and services, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp 165–178
Reussner RH, Schmidt HW, Poernomo IH (2003) Reliability prediction for component-based software architectures. J Syst Softw 66(3):241–252
Roughan M, Griffin T, Mao M, Greenberg A, Freeman B (2004) Combining routing and traffic data for detection of IP forwarding anomalies. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 32(1):416–417
Russell S, Forgionne G, Yoon V (2008) Presence and availability awareness for decision support systems in pervasive computing environments. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol 1(1)
Salas J, Perez-Sorrosal F, Martinez MP, Jimenez-Peris R (2006) WS-replication: a framework for highly available web services. In: 15th International world wide web conference, ACM, Edinburgh, Scotland
Sawyer S, Allen JP, Lee H (2003) Broadband and mobile opportunities: a socio-technical perspective. J Inform Technol 18(2):121–136
Shahram G, Shyam K, Bhaskar K (2006) An evaluation of availability latency in carrier-based wehicular ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on data engineering for wireless and mobile access, ACM Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Simon HA (1960) The new science of management decision. Harper & Row, New York, USA
Sung H, Choi B, Kim H, Song J, Han S, Ang C-W, Cheng W-C, Wong K-S (2007) Dynamic clustering model for high service availability. In: Eighth international symposium on autonomous decentralized systems (ISADS’07), IEEE computer society, Sedona, AZ, USA
Thio N, Karunasekera S (2005) Automatic measurement of a QoS metric for web service recommendation. Australian software engineering conference, Brisbane, Australia, pp 202–211
Weatherspoon H, Chun B-G, So CW, Kubiatowicz J (2005) Long-term data maintenance in wide-area storage systems: a quantitative approach. Technical Report UCB/CSD-05-1404, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Xu J, Lee W (2003) Sustaining availability of web services under distributed denial of service attacks. IEEE Trans Comput 52(2):195–208
Zhoujun H, Zhigang H, Zhenhua L (2007) Resource availability evaluation in service grid environment. In: 2nd IEEE Asia-pacific service computing conference (APSCC 2007), IEEE computer society, Tsukuba Science City, Japan
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, S., Yoon, V. & Forgionne, G. Cloud-based decision support systems and availability context: the probability of successful decision outcomes. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 8, 189–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0126-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-010-0126-4