Skip to main content
Log in

Sociomaterial actors in the assimilation gap: a case study of web service, management and IT-assimilation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the conditions for the assimilation of information systems (IS) and information technology (IT) in organizations and the influence of various actors in the organization and eBusiness context. To do so it draws on the literature on assimilation gap, sociomateriality and infrastructure together with a study of implementation and use of information and communication technology in and among organizations in a Swedish region. There were substantial investments in web infrastructure made on a regional level and the focus of this study is how the investments were transformed and assimilated in practices, relations and communication. Based on the empirical data from the case study, the paper extends the assimilation process into interplay among actors in organizations contexts. It describes organizations’ strategies for coping with their needs for information and the actors in these processes. Two categories of actors are identified, sensemaking and sensegiving actors, as most important in assimilation of IS/IT in organizations. A sociomaterial perspective gives guidance and a better understanding of the assimilation process in terms of knowledge and interpretative frames, and how assimilation involves identity construction and negotiations among sensemaking and sensegiving actors. The contribution of this paper is a better understanding of the context of assimilation and adaptation of IT in organizations’ business processes, and steps to be taken to improve readiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Almi mission is financing and business development that is complementary to the market, where Almi is the channel for investment based on an industrial policy that promotes economic growth”. Almi.se, http://www.almi.se/ALMI-in-English/.

References

  • Alvesson M, Sköldberg K (2009) Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research, 2nd edn. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies P (2009) Information systems as socio-technical or sociomaterial systems. In: AMCIS 2009 proceedings, p 705

  • Bijker W (1995) Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman M (2006) (2006), Developing, and testing, a theoretical framework for inter-organisational systems (IOS) as infrastructure to aid future IOS design. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 4:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent M, Weill P (1997) Management by maxim: how business and it managers can create it infrastructures. Slo Manag Rev Spring 38(2):77

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (2003) Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Polity Press, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H (2010) A roadmap to adopting emerging technology in e-business: an empirical study. Inf Syst e-Bus Manag 8:103–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra CU, Lanzara GF (1994) Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Account Manag Inf Technol 4:61–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra CU, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA (2000) From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (1994) Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks

  • Edwards P, Jackson S, Bowker G, Knobel C (2007) Understanding Infrastructure: dynamics, tensions, and designs, final report of the workshop, “history and theory of infrastructure: lessons for new scientific cyberinfrastructures”, nsf grant 0630263—human and social dynamics. Computer and information science and engineering, Office of cyberinfrastructure

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1999) The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps. Inf Syst Res 10(3):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal U, Yoo Y, Boland R (2005) The dynamics of boundary objects, social infrastructures and social identities. 13th European conference on information systems. Regensburg, Germany

  • Gioia D, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg Manag J 12(6):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagén H-O, Zeed J (2005) Does IT-use matter for firm productivity? Yearbook on productivity 2005. Stockholm, Statistics Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1998) Understanding Information Infrastructure. http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/bok.html

  • Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2004) Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: design kernel theories and principles. sprouts: working papers on information environments. Syst Organ 4:207–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Henfridsson O (2000) Ambiguity in IT adaption: making sense of first class in a social work setting. Inf Syst J 10:87–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in Information Systems. MIS Q 23:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1992) “Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts”. In: Bijker Wiebe E, Law John (eds) Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press, USA, pp 225–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1996) Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. Information technology and changes in organizational work. In: Proceeding of the IFIP WG8.2 working conference on information technology and changes in organizational work

  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2008) Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Inf Organ 18(3):159–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad Manag Ann 4(1):1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutek (2004) Hur kan IT-kompetensen öka i små och medelstora företag? In: Nutek (ed) Stockholm, Sweden, Nutek (the Swedish agency for economic and regional growth)

  • Orlikowski W (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11:404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W, Gash DC (1994) Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Trans Inf Syst 12:174–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1980) Qualitative evaluation methods. Sage, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson JT (2000) Kommunikationerna och den regionala utvecklingen. Regionalpol. utr. 5 ed

  • Riedl C, Böhmann T, Roseman M, Krcmar H (2009) Qual Manag Serv Ecosyst 2009(7):199–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman L (2006) Sensemaking throughout adoption and the innovation-decision process. Eur J Innov Manag 9:108–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg AM (2003) Sensegiving and sensemaking in an integration processes. In: Czarniawska B, Gagliardi P (eds) Narratives we organize by. Philadelphia, PA, USA John Benjamins

  • Star SL (2002) Infrastructure and ethnographic practice—working on the fringes. Scand J Inf Syst 14:107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged scholarship—a guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner EL, Scott SV, Galliers RD (2006) The creation of ‘best practice’ software: myth, reality and ethics. Inf Organ 16:251–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsham G (1993) Interpreting information systems in organizations. John Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Inc, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ Sci 16:409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill P, Broadbent M (1998) Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

  • Westergren U (2011) Disentangling sociomateriality—an exploration of remote monitoring systems in interorganization networks, PhD dissertation, Research reports in informatics, ISSN 1401-4572; RR-11.02, Umeå University, Sweden

  • Yin R (1994) Case study research, Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc, California

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klas Gäre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gäre, K., Melin, U. Sociomaterial actors in the assimilation gap: a case study of web service, management and IT-assimilation. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 11, 481–506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-012-0205-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-012-0205-9

Keywords

Navigation