Skip to main content
Log in

Semantic integration of enterprise information systems using meta-metadata ontology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a non-domain-specific metadata ontology as a core component in a semantic model-based document management system (DMS), a potential contender towards the enterprise information systems of the next generation. What we developed is the core semantic component of an ontology-driven DMS, providing a robust semantic base for describing documents’ metadata. We also enabled semantic services such as automated semantic translation of metadata from one domain to another. The core semantic base consists of three semantic layers, each one serving a different view of documents’ metadata. The core semantic component’s base layer represents a non-domain-specific metadata ontology founded on ebRIM specification. The main purpose of this ontology is to serve as a meta-metadata ontology for other domain-specific metadata ontologies. The base semantic layer provides a generic metadata view. For the sake of enabling domain-specific views of documents’ metadata, we implemented two domain-specific metadata ontologies, semantically layered on top of ebRIM, serving domain-specific views of the metadata. In order to enable semantic translation of metadata from one domain to another, we established model-to-model mappings between these semantic layers by introducing SWRL rules. Having the semantic translation of metadata automated not only allows for effortless switching between different metadata views, but also opens the door for automating the process of documents long-term archiving. For the case study, we chose judicial domain as a promising ground for improving the efficiency of the judiciary by introducing the semantics in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoma Ntoso (2010) Akoma Ntoso Site. http://www.akomantoso.org/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Arsić B, Ðokić M, Stefanović N (2014a) Mapping ebXML standards to ontology. International Conference on Information Society and Technology (ICIST). Kopaonik, Serbia, pp 198–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsić B, Ðokić M, Stefanović N (2014) Mapping ebXML standards to ontology. In: International conference on information society and technology (ICIST). Kopaonik, Serbia, pp 198–203

  • Bechini A, Tomasi A, Viotto J (2008) Enabling ontology-based document classification and management in ebXML registries. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC)

  • Ceci M, Gangemi A (2014) An OWL ontology library representing judicial interpretations. Semantic Web journal. doi:10.3233/SW-140146

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Zhu X, Zhang X, Du D (2007) Geospatial data and services semantic share based on ebXML registry. In: Second international conference on space information technology

  • Chen X, Zhu X, Du D (2008) Ontology based semantic metadata for imagery and gridded data. In: The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

  • Chen N, Di L, Yu G et al (2009) Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Comput Geosci 35:360–372. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu E (2002) EbXML simplified: a guide to the new standard for global e-commerce. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogac A, Kabak Y, Laleci G (2004) Enriching ebXML registries with OWL ontologies for efficient service discovery. In: 14th international workshop on research issues in data engineering (RIDE-WS-ECEG 2004), web services for e-commerce and e-government applications

  • Dogac A, Laleci G, Kabak Y et al (2006a) Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. IJMSO 1:21. doi:10.1504/ijmso.2006.008767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogac A, Laleci G, Kabak Y et al (2006b) Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics. J Metadata Semant Ontol 1:21. doi:10.1504/ijmso.2006.008767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giereth M, Koch S, Kompatsiaris Y, Papadopoulos S (2007) A modular framework for ontology-based representation of patent information. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2007: the twentieth annual conference. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 49–58

  • Gluz J, Viccari R (2012) An OWL Ontology for IEEE-LOM and OBAA Metadata. Intell Tutor Syst. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_124

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostojić S, Sladić G, Milosavljević B, Konjović Z (2012) Context-sensitive access control model for government services. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 22:184–213. doi:10.1080/10919392.2012.667717

    Google Scholar 

  • Gostojić S, Sladić G, Milosavljević B et al. (2014) Semantic driven document and workflow management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on applied internet and information technologies (ICAIIT 2014). Zrenjanin, Serbia, pp 229–234

  • Gruber T (1992) What is an Ontology? In: Knowledge Systems, Stanford University. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Health Level Seven (HL7) (2004) HL7 EHR—system functional model, release 2. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=269. Accessed 20 Dec 2015

  • Houbie F (2009) Semantic metadata in catalogue. In: Ontology and discovery workshop, lecture conducted from ESRIN. https://wiki.services.eoportal.org/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=269. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • IEEE (2002) IEEE P1484.12.1-2002, draft standard for learning object metadata. IEEE, Inc. http://129.115.100.158/txlor/docs/IEEE_LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2015

  • International Council on Archives (ICA) (2011) ISAD(G): general international standard for archival description, 2nd edn. http://www.ica.org/10207/standards/isadg-general-international-standard-archival-description-second-edition.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Kumar S (2011) Archives: principles and practices. Isha Books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar R, Gostojić S, Sladić G et al (2015) Enabling customization of document-centric systems using document management ontology. In: International conference on information society and technology (ICIST). Kopaonik, Serbia, pp 239–243

  • Negru S, Lohmann S, Haag F et al. (2011) VOWL: visual notation for OWL ontologies. In: Visual data web. http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/v2/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • OASIS (2005) ebXML registry webinar. https://www.oasis-open.org/presentations/registry_webinar_05.ppt. Accessed 5 Jun 2015

  • OASIS (2012) ebXML RegRep version 4.0. Overview document. http://docs.oasis-open.org/regrep/regrep-core/v4.0/regrep-core-overview-v4.0.pdf. Accessed 5 Jun 2015

  • OASIS (2012) RegRep technical committee. https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • OASIS (2012) RegRep version 4.0. Registry information model (ebRIM). http://docs.oasis-open.org/regrep/regrep-core/v4.0/os/regrep-core-rim-v4.0-os.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • OASIS (2014) Regrep Wiki. https://wiki.oasis-open.org/regrep/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Peters M, Brink C, Sachweh S (2012) Including metadata into an ontology based pervasive computing architecture. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 11th international conference on trust, security and privacy in computing and communications. IEEE, Liverpool, UK, pp 1507–1512

  • Piedra N, Chicaiza J, López J et al (2010) An approach for description of open educational resources based on semantic technologies. In: Proceedings of IEEE education engineering (IEEE EDUCON 2010). Madrid, Spain, pp 1111–1119

  • Saathoff C, Scherp A (2009) M3O: the multimedia metadata ontology. In: Proceedings of the workshop on semantic multimedia database technologies (SeMuDaTe)

  • Sakharov A (2003) Horn clause. In: MathWorld—a wolfram web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HornClause.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Sladić D, Govedarica M, Jovanović D (2012) Spatial metadata and ontologies in cadastral systems. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on methodologies, technologies, and tools enabling e-government (MeTTeG12)

  • Society of American Archivists (2005) A glossary of archival and records terminology. http://www2.archivists.org/glossary. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Song D, Liu W, He Y, He K (2005) Ontology application in software component registry to achieve semantic interoperability. In: International conference on information technology: coding and computing (ITCC)

  • Sounderpandian J, Sinha T (2007) E-business process management: technologies and solutions. Idea Group Pub, Hershey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taduri S, Lau G, Law K et al (2011) An ontology to integrate multiple information domains in the patent system. In: IEEE international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS)

  • Viccari R, Gluz J, Passerino L et al (2010) The OBAA proposal for learning objects supported by agents. In: Proceedings of MASEIE workshop (AAMAS)

  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2004) SWRL: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2012) OWL 2 web ontology language document overview, 2nd edn. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/. Accessed 5 Jun 2015

  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2013) SPARQL 1.1 overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview/. Accessed 6 Jun 2015

  • Wyner A, Hoekstra R (2012) A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi. Artif Intell Law 20:83–107. doi:10.1007/s10506-012-9119-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zdravković M, Trajanović M (2013) On the semantic issues of electronic health records for virtual physiological human infrastructures. In: International conference on information society and technology (ICIST). Kopaonik, Serbia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Cverdelj-Fogaraši.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cverdelj-Fogaraši, I., Sladić, G., Gostojić, S. et al. Semantic integration of enterprise information systems using meta-metadata ontology. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 15, 257–304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0303-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0303-6

Keywords

Navigation