Abstract
The empirical likelihood ratio is not defined when the null vector does not belong to the convex hull of the estimating functions computed on the data. This may happen with non-negligible probability when the number of observations is small and the dimension of the estimating functions is large: it is called the convex hull problem. Several modifications have been proposed to overcome such drawback: the penalized, the adjusted, the balanced and the extended empirical likelihoods, though they yield different values from the ordinary empirical likelihood in all cases. The convex hull problem is addressed here in the framework of nonlinear optimization, proposing to follow the penalty method. A generalized empirical likelihood in penalty form is considered, and all the proposed modifications are shown to be in that form. We propose simple penalty forms of the empirical likelihood, whose values are equal to those of the ordinary empirical likelihood when the convex hull condition is satisfied. A comparison by simulation and real data is included. All proofs and additional simulation results appear in the Supplementary Material.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adimari G, Guolo A (2010) A note on the asymptotic behaviour of empirical likelihood statistics. Stat Methods Appl 19:463–476
Baggerly KA (1998) Empirical likelihood as a goodness-of-fit measure. Biometrika 85:535–547
Baragona R, Battaglia F, Cucina D (2016) Empirical likelihood for outlier detection and estimation in autoregressive time series. J Time Ser Anal 37:315–336
Bartolucci F (2007) A penalized version of the empirical likelihood ratio for the population mean. Stat Probab Lett 77:104–110
Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Chen SX, Cui H (2007) On the second-order properties of empirical likelihood with moment restrictions. J Econom 141:492–516
Chen SK, Van Keilegom I (2009) A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression. Test 18:415–447
Chen YT, Leng C (2010) Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood. Biometrika 97:905–920
Chen J, Huang Y (2013) Finite-sample properties of the adjusted empirical likelihood. J Nonparametr Stat 25:147–159
Camponovo L, Otsu T (2014) On Bartlett correctability of empirical likelihood in generalized power divergence family. Stat Probab Lett 86:38–43
Chen J, Variyath AM, Abraham B (2008) Adjusted empirical likelihood and its properties. J Comput Graph Stat 17:426–443
DiCiccio TJ, Hall P, Romano JP (1991) Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable. Ann Stat 19:1053–1061
Emerson S, Owen A (2009) Calibration of the empirical likelihood method for a vector mean. Electron J Stat 3:1161–1192
Fan J, Li R (2001) Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1348–1360
Grendar M, Judge G (2009) Empty set problem of maximum empirical likelihood methods. Electron J Stat 3:1542–1555
Griva I, Nash SG, Sofer A (2009) Linear and nonlinear optimization, 2nd edn. SIAM, Philadelphia
Kitchell JA, Peña D (1984) Periodicity of extinctions in the geological past: deterministic versus stochastic explanations. Science 226:689–692
Lazar N (2005) Assessing the effect of individual data points on inference from empirical likelihood. J Comput Graph Stat 14:626–642
Lahiri S, Mukhopadhyay S (2012) A penalized empirical likelihood method in high dimension. Ann Stat 40:2511–2540
Liu Y, Chen J (2010) Adjusted empirical likelihood with high-order precision. Ann Stat 38:1341–1362
Lunardon N, Adimari G (2016) Second-order accurate confidence regions based on members of the generalized power divergence family. Scand J Stat 43:213–227
Nguyen MK, Phelps S, Ng WL (2015) Simulation based calibration using extended balanced empirical likelihood. Stat Comput 25:1093–1112
Nordman DJ, Lahiri SN (2014) A review of empirical likelihood methods for time series. J Stat Plan Inference 155:1–18
Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75:237–249
Owen AB (1990) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat 18:90–120
Owen AB (1991) Empirical likelihood for linear models. Ann Stat 19:1725–1747
Owen AB (2001) Empirical likelihood. Chapman and Hall CRC, Boca Raton
Peña D (1990) Influential observations in time series. J Bus Econ Stat 8:235–242
Qin J, Lawless J (1994) Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann Stat 22:300–325
Qin J, Lawless J (1995) Estimating equations, empirical likelihood and constraints on parameters. Can J Stat 23:145–159
Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ (1984) Periodicity of extinctions in the geological past. Proc Natl Acad Sci 81:801–805
Read T, Cressie N (1988) Goodness of fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. Springer, New York
Tsao M (2004) Bounds on coverage probabilities of the empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat 32:1215–1221
Tsao M (2013) Extending the empirical likelihood by domain expansion. Can J Stat 41:257–274
Tsao M, Zhou J (2001) On the robustness of empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for location. Can J Stat 29:129–140
Tsao M, Wu F (2013) Empirical likelihood on the full parameter space. Ann Stat 41:2176–2196
Tsao M, Wu F (2014) Extended empirical likelihood for estimating equations. Biometrika 101:703–710
Wendel JG (1962) A problem in geometric probability. Math Scand 11:109–111
Zhu H, Ibrahim JG, Tang N, Zhang H (2008) Diagnostic measures for empirical likelihood of general estimating equations. Biometrika 95:489–507
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, PRIN Research Project 2010–11 prot. 2010J3LZEN. The authors are grateful to an Associate Editor and two anonymous Referees for their very useful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baragona, R., Battaglia, F. & Cucina, D. Empirical likelihood ratio in penalty form and the convex hull problem. Stat Methods Appl 26, 507–529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-017-0382-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-017-0382-2