Skip to main content
Log in

Where does model-driven engineering help? Experiences from three industrial cases

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Software & Systems Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been few experience reports from industry on how Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is applied and what the benefits are. This paper summarizes the experiences of three large industrial participants in a European research project with the objective of developing techniques and tools for applying MDE on the development of large and complex software systems. The participants had varying degrees of previous experience with MDE. They found MDE to be particularly useful for providing abstractions of complex systems at multiple levels or from different viewpoints, for the development of domain-specific models that facilitate communication with non-technical experts, for the purposes of simulation and testing, and for the consumption of models for analysis, such as performance-related decision support and system design improvements. From the industrial perspective, a methodology is considered to be useful and cost-efficient if it is possible to reuse solutions in multiple projects or products. However, developing reusable solutions required extra effort and sometimes had a negative impact on the performance of tools. While the companies identified several benefits of MDE, merging different tools with one another in a seamless development environment required several transformations, which increased the required implementation effort and complexity. Additionally, user-friendliness of tools and the provision of features for managing models of complex systems were identified as crucial for a wider industrial adoption of MDE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

API:

Application Programming Interface

BPM:

Business Process Modelling

DSL:

Domain-Specific Language

DSML:

Domain-Specific Modelling Language

GUI:

Graphical User Interface

MBT:

Model-Based Testing

MDE:

Model-Driven Engineering

MDPE:

Model-Driven Performance Engineering

OMG:

Object Management Group

SOA:

Service-Oriented Architecture

UML:

Unified Modeling Language

References

  1. Brown, A.: An Introduction to Model Driven Architecture—Part I: MDA and today’s systems. The Rational Edge (2004)

  2. Davis F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3), 318–339 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans, A., Fernández, M.A., Mohagheghi, P.: Experiences of developing a network modeling tool using the Eclipse environment. In: Proc. of ECMDA-FA’09. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 301–312. Springer, Berlin (2009)

  4. Ferrari, A., Fantechi, A., Papini, M., Grasso, D.: An industrial application of formal model-based development: the Metro Rio ATP case. In: Proc. of 2nd Int. Workshop on Software Engineering for Resilient Systems (SERENE 2010). http://www.dsi.unifi.it/~fantechi/Collaborazionegets/pubblicazioni.html

  5. France R.B., Ghosh S., Dinh-Trong T., Solberg A.: Model- driven development using UML 2.0: promises and pitfalls. IEEE Comput. 39(2), 59–66 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritzsche, M., Gilani, W., Fritzsche, C., Spence, I.T.A., Kilpatrick, P., Brown, T.J.: Towards utilizing model-driven engineering of composite applications for business performance analysis. In: Proc. of ECMDA-FA’08. LNCS, vol. 5095, pp. 369–380. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  7. Fritzsche, M., Picht, M., Gilani, W., Spence, I., Brown, J., Kilpatrick, P.: Extending BPM environments of your choice with performance related decision support. In: Proc. of Business Process Management (BPM’09). LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 97–112. Springer, Berlin (2009)

  8. Fritzsche, M., Gilani W., Lämmel R., Jouault, F.: Model transformation chains in model-driven performance engineering: experiences and future research needs. In: Proc. of Modellierung 2010. LNI, vol. 161, pp. 213–220. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  9. Hästbacka, D., Vepsäläinen, T., Kuikka, S.: Model-driven development of industrial process control applications. J. Syst. Softw. (2011, accepted) doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.63

  10. Johannes, J., Fernández, M.A.: Adding abstraction and reuse to a network modelling tool using the Reuseware composition framework. In: Proc. of ECMFA’10. LNCS, vol. 6138, pp. 132–143. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  11. Kirstan, S., Zimmermann, J.: Evaluating costs and benefits of model-based development of embedded software systems in the car industry—results of a qualitative case study. In: Proc. of 5th C2M:EEMDD Workshop at ECMFA’10, pp. 18–29 (2010)

  12. Kelly S., Pohjonen R.: Worst practices for domain-specific modelling. IEEE Softw. 26(4), 22–29 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kätker, S., Patig, S.: Model-driven development of service-oriented business application systems. In: Business Services: Konzepte, Technologien, Anwendungen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, Band 1, pp. 171–180. Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (2009)

  14. Mohagheghi, P., Dehlen, V.: Where is the proof? A review of experiences from applying MDE in industry. In: Proc. of ECMDA-FA’08, LNCS, vol. 5095, pp. 432–443. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  15. Mohagheghi, P.: An approach for empirical evaluation of model-driven engineering in multiple dimensions. In: Proc. of 5th C2M:EEMDD Workshop at ECMFA’10, pp. 6–17 (2010). http://www.esi.es/modelplex/c2m/papers.php

  16. Schmidt, M., Polowinski, J., Johannes, J., Fernández, M.A.: An integrated facet-based library for arbitrary software components. In: Proc. of ECMFA’10, LNCS, vol. 6138, pp. 261–276. Springer, Berlin (2010)

  17. Stefanescu, A., Wieczorek, S., Kirshin, A.: MBT4Chor: a model-based testing approach for service choreographies. In: Proc. of ECMDA-FA’09. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 313–324. Springer, Berlin (2009)

  18. van Amstel, M., Lange, C., van den Brand M.: Metrics for analysing the quality of model transformations. In Proceedings of the 12th ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches on Object Oriented Software Engineering, pp. 41–51 (2008)

  19. Wadler, P.: Deforestation: transforming programs to eliminate trees. In: Proc. of the 2nd European Symposium on Programming, pp. 231–248. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parastoo Mohagheghi.

Additional information

Communicated by Prof. Perdita Stevens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohagheghi, P., Gilani, W., Stefanescu, A. et al. Where does model-driven engineering help? Experiences from three industrial cases. Softw Syst Model 12, 619–639 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-011-0219-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-011-0219-7

Keywords

Navigation