Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective Evaluation of a Machine-Learning Prediction Model for Missed Radiology Appointments

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “no-show” refers to scheduled appointments that a patient misses, or for which she arrives too late to utilize medical resources. Accurately predicting no-shows creates opportunities to intervene, ensuring that patients receive needed medical resources. A machine-learning (ML) model can accurately identify individuals at high no-show risk, to facilitate strategic and targeted interventions. We used 4,546,104 non-same-day scheduled appointments in our medical system from 1/1/2017 through 1/1/2020 for training data, including 631,386 no-shows. We applied eight ML techniques, which yielded cross-validation AUCs of 0.77–0.93. We then prospectively tested the best performing model, Gradient Boosted Regression Trees, over a 6-week period at a single outpatient location. We observed 123 no-shows. The model accurately identified likely no-show patients retrospectively (AUC 0.93) and prospectively (AUC 0.73, p < 0.0005). Individuals in the highest-risk category were three times more likely to no-show than the average of all other patients. No-show prediction modeling based on machine learning has the potential to identify patients for targeted interventions to improve their access to medical resources, reduce waste in the medical system and improve overall operational efficiency. Caution is advised, due to the potential for bias to decrease the quality of service for patients based on race, zip code, and gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carreras-García D, Delgado-Gómez D, Llorente-Fernández F, Arribas-Gil A. Patient No-Show Prediction: A Systematic Literature Review. Entropy. 2020;22(6):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060675

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurasawa H, Hayashi K, Fujino A, et al. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of a Missed Scheduled Clinical Appointment by Patients With Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10(3):730-736. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815614866

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim DW, Jang HY, Kim KW, Shin Y, Park SH. Design Characteristics of Studies Reporting the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diagnostic Analysis of Medical Images: Results from Recently Published Papers. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(3):405-410. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv. 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874

  5. Allen B, Dreyer K. The Role of the ACR Data Science Institute in Advancing Health Equity in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol JACR. 2019;16(4 Pt B):644-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Rothenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rothenberg, S., Bame, B. & Herskovitz, E. Prospective Evaluation of a Machine-Learning Prediction Model for Missed Radiology Appointments. J Digit Imaging 35, 1690–1693 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00670-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00670-3