Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of Automatic Portable Pathology Scanner and Its Evaluation for Clinical Practice

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital pathological scanners transform traditional glass slides into whole slide images (WSIs), which significantly improve the efficiency of pathological diagnosis and promote the development of digital pathology. However, the huge economic burden limits the spread and application of general WSI scanners in relatively remote and backward regions. In this paper, we develop an automatic portable cytopathology scanner based on mobile internet, Landing-Smart, to avert the above problems. Landing-Smart is a tiny device with a size of 208 mm × 107 mm × 104 mm and a weight of 1.8 kg, which integrates four main components including a smartphone, a glass slide carrier, an electric controller, and an optical imaging unit. By leveraging a simple optical imaging unit to substitute the sophisticated but complex conventional light microscope, the cost of Landing-Smart is less than $3000, much cheaper than general WSI scanners. On the one hand, Landing-Smart utilizes the built-in camera of the smartphone to acquire field of views (FoVs) in the section one by one. On the other hand, it uploads the images to the cloud server in real time via mobile internet, where the image processing and stitching method is implemented to generate the WSI of the cytological sample. The practical assessment of 209 cervical cytological specimens has demonstrated that Landing-Smart is comparable to general digital scanners in cytopathology diagnosis. Landing-Smart provides an effective tool for preliminary cytological screening in underdeveloped areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Lin JR, Izar B and Wang S, Yapp C, Mei SL, Shah PM, Santagata S, Sorger PK: Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of human tissues and tumors using t-CyCIF and conventional optical microscopes. ELife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31657, July 11, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson HW, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Ali HR, Mechera R, Soysal SD, Moch H, Muenst S, Varga Z, Weber WP, Bodenmiller B: The single-cell pathology landscape of breast cancer. Nature 578(7796):615-620, 2020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce BF: Whole slide imaging: uses and limitations for surgical pathology and teaching. Biotechnic & Histochemistry 90(5):321-330, 2015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright AM, Smith D and Dhurandhar B, Fairley T, Scheiber-Pacht M, Chakraborty S, Gorman BK, Mody D, Coffey DM: Digital slide imaging in cervicovaginal cytology: a pilot study. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 137(5):618-624, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang MC, Mrkonjic M: Review of the current state of digital image analysis in breast pathology. The Breast Journal 26(6):1208-1212, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans A J, Salama ME and Henricks WH, Pantanowitz L: Implementation of whole slide imaging for clinical purposes. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 141(7):944-959, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capitanio A, Dina RE, Treanor D: Digital cytology: A short review of technical and methodological approaches and applications. Cytopathology 29(4):317-325, 2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar N, Gupta R, Gupta S: Whole slide imaging (WSI) in pathology: current perspectives and future directions. Journal of Digital Imaging 33(4):1034-1040, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma YB, Jiang ZG and Zhang HP, Xie FY, Zheng YS, Shi HQ, Zhao Y: Breast histopathological image retrieval based on latent Dirichlet allocation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 21(4):1114-1123, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Girolami I, Pantanowitz L and Marletta S, Brunelli M, Mescoli C, Parisi A, Barresi V, Parwani A, Neil D, Scarpa A: Diagnostic concordance between whole slide imaging and conventional light microscopy in cytopathology: a systematic review. Cancer Cytopathology 128(1):17-28, 2019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross J, Greaves J and Earls P, Shulruf B, Van Es SL: Digital vs traditional: are diagnostic accuracy rates similar for glass slides vs whole slide images in a non-gynaecological external quality assurance setting? Cytopathology 29(4):326-334, 2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bauer TW, Slaw RJ: Validating whole-slide imaging for consultation diagnoses in surgical pathology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 138(11):1459-1465, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanna M.G, Monaco SE and Cuda J, Xing J, Ahmed I, Pantanowitz L: Comparison of glass slides and various digital-slide modalities for cytopathology screening and interpretation. Cancer Cytopathology 125(9):701-709, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saco A, Ramírez J and Rakislova N, Mira A, Ordi J: Validation of whole-slide imaging for histolopathogical diagnosis: current state. Pathobiology 83(2-3):89-98, 2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang P, Liu J, Xiao D, Pang B, Hao Z, Cao D. A novel IoMT system for pathological diagnosis based on intelligent mobile scanner and whole slide image stitching method. In: International Conference on Intelligent Computing, pp.463–472, Springer 2022.

  16. Monaco SE, Pantanowitz L: Telecytology value and validation: developing a validation and competency tool for telecytology. Diagnostic Cytopathology 43(1):1-2, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhoads DD, Mathison BA and Bishop HS, da Silva AJ, Pantanowitz L: Review of telemicrobiology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 140(4):362-370, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ordi J, Castillo P and Saco A, del Pina M, Ordi O, Rodriguez-Carunchio L, Ramirez J: Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a university hospital. Journal of Clinical Pathology 68(1):33-39, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marzahl C, Aubreville M and Bertram CA, Stayt J, Jasensky AK, Bartenschlager F, Fragoso-Garcia M, Barton AK, Elsemann S, Jabari S, Krauth J, Madhu P, Voigt J, Hill J, Klopfleisch R, Maier A: Deep learning-based quantification of pulmonary hemosiderophages in cytology slides. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65958-2, August 3, 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan S, Islam N and Jan Z, Din IU, Rodrigues JJRC: A novel deep learning based framework for the detection and classification of breast cancer using transfer learning. Pattern Recognition Letters 125:1-6, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans AJ, Vajpeyi R, Henry M, and Chetty R: Establishment of a remote diagnostic histopathology service using whole slide imaging (digital pathology). Journal of Clinical Pathology 74(7):421-424, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel A, Balis UG, Cheng J, Li Z, Lujan G, McClintock DS, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A. Contemporary whole slide imaging devices and their applications within the modern pathology department: a selected hardware review. Journal of Pathology Informatics 12(1):50, 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sohn E: Detecting cancer using limited resources. Nature 579(7800):S17-S19, 2020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu H, Gao F, Jiang LR, Ma SX: Development of a whole slide imaging system on smartphones and evaluation with frozen section samples. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8242, September 15, 2017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang YN, Peng XC, Ma SX, Yu H, Jin YB, Zheng J, Fu GH: Development of whole slide imaging on smartphones and evaluation with ThinPrep cytology test samples: follow-up study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9518, April 4, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N: The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of Medical Internet Researc. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1994, September 27, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brunelli R, Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice, Wiley, ISBN 978–0–470–51706–2, 2009.

  28. Blackman NJ, Koval JJ: Interval estimation for Cohen’s kappa as a measure of agreement. Statistics in Medicine 19(5):723-741, 2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Major Projects of Technological Innovation in Hubei Province (2019AEA170, 2019ACA161), the Frontier Projects of Wuhan for Application Foundation (2019010701011381), and the Translational Medicine and Interdisciplinary Research Joint Fund of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (ZNJC201919).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P. J. conceptualized and designed the study, carried out the data analyses, interpreted the results, and drafted the initial manuscript. J. L. carried out the data analysis, supervised the work, and revised and edited the manuscript. D. X., P. P., and D. C. implemented the mobile device and collected the data. Z. H. collected the data and diagnosed the samples. All authors assume public responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of Wuhan University in view of the retrospective nature of the study, and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine investigation.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, P., Liu, J., Luo, Q. et al. Development of Automatic Portable Pathology Scanner and Its Evaluation for Clinical Practice. J Digit Imaging 36, 1110–1122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00761-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00761-1

Keywords

Navigation