Skip to main content
Log in

Risk aversion for an electricity retailer with second-order stochastic dominance constraints

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present the problem faced by an electricity retailer which searches to determine its forward contracting portfolio and the selling prices for its potential clients. This problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic program including second-order stochastic dominance constraints. The stochastic dominance theory is used in order to reduce the risk suffering from low profits. The resulting deterministic equivalent problem is a mixed-integer linear program which is solved using commercial branch-and-cut software. Numerical results for a realistic case study are reported and relevant conclusions are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed S (2006) Convexity and decomposition of mean-risk stochastic programs. Math Program 106(3): 433–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank B, Mandel R (1988) Parametric integer optimization. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Birge JR, Louveaux F (1997) Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair CE, Jeroslow RG (1977) The value function of a mixed integer program. Discrete Math 19(2): 121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman R (1998) GAMS: A User’s Guide, GAMS Development Corporation, Washington

  • Carrión M, Conejo AJ, Arroyo JM (2007a) Forward contracting and selling price determination for a retailer. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(4): 2105–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrión M, Philpott AB, Conejo AJ, Arroyo JM (2007b) A stochastic programming approach to electric energy procurement for large consumers. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(2): 744–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conejo AJ, Contreras J, Espínola R, Plazas MA (2005) Forecasting electricity prices for a day-ahead pool-based electric energy market. Int J Forecast 21(3): 435–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras J, Espínola R, Nogales FJ, Conejo AJ (2003) ARIMA models to predict next-day electricity prices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(3): 1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2003) Optimization with dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 14: 548–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2004) Optimality and duality theory for stochastic optimization with nonlinear dominance constraints. Math Program 99: 329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentcheva D, Henrion R, Ruszczyński A (2007) Stability and sensitivity of optimization problems with first order stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J Optim 18(1): 322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drapkin D, Schultz R (2008) An algorithm for stochastic programs with first-order dominance constraints induced by linear recourse. Discrete Appl Math (to appear)

  • Eichhorn A, Römisch W (2003) Polyhedral risk measures in stochastic programming. SIAM J Optim 14: 548–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel SA, Conejo AJ, Plazas MA, Balakrishnan S (2006) Optimal price and quantity determination for retail electric power contracts. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(1): 180–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollmer R, Gotzes U, Schultz R (2007) Second-order stochastic dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. Preprint 644-2007 Department of Mathematics, University of Duisburg-Essen. http://www.uni-duisburg.de/FB11/disma/gotzes/preprint644.pdf

  • Gollmer R, Neise F, Schultz R (2008) Stochastic programs with first-order dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. SIAM J Optim 19: 552–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Villalva E, Ramos A (2003) Optimal energy management of an industrial consumer in liberalized markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(2): 716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILOG (2006) ILOG CPLEX 10. http://www.ilog.com/products/cplex/

  • Luedtke J (2008) New formulations for optimization under stochastic dominance constraints, working paper, online resource. SIAM J Optim (accepted)

  • Märkert A, Schultz R (2005) On deviation measures in stochastic integer programming. Oper Res Lett 33: 441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Scarsini M (2006) Stochastic order relations and lattices of probability measures. SIAM J Optim 16(4): 1024–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Stoyan D (2002) Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogales FJ, Contreras J, Conejo AJ, Espínola R (2002) Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17(2): 342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyan N, Rudolf G, Ruszczyński A (2006) Relaxations of linear programming problems with first order stochastic dominance constraints. Oper Res Lett 34(6): 653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OMEL (2007) Market Operator of the Electricity Market of Mainland Spain. http://www.omel.es

  • OMIP (2007) Forward and Futures Market of the Iberian Electricity Market, Spain and Portugal. http://www.omip.pt

  • Plazas MA, Conejo AJ, Prieto FJ (2005) Multimarket optimal bidding for a power producer. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(4): 2041–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3): 21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7): 1443–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz R, Tiedemann S (2003) Risk aversion via excess probabilities in stochastic programs with mixed-integer recourse. SIAM J Optim 14: 115–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz R, Tiedemann S (2006) Conditional value-at-risk in stochastic programs with mixed-integer recourse. Math Program 105: 365–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z (2002) Market operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling, and risk management. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheblé GB (1999) Computational auction mechanisms for restructured power industry operation. Kluwer, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha GB, Pokharel BK, Lie TT, Fleten S-E (2005) Medium term power planning with bilateral contracts. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(2): 627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Gotzes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carrión, M., Gotzes, U. & Schultz, R. Risk aversion for an electricity retailer with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Comput Manag Sci 6, 233–250 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-008-0091-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-008-0091-2

Keywords

Navigation