Skip to main content
Log in

Bounds on mean absolute deviation portfolios under interval-valued expected future asset returns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work concerns a suitable range of optimal portfolio compositions as well as their optimal returns in the mean absolute deviation portfolio selection model when a threshold return expected from the investment is given. Disagreement in measurements of expected future asset returns is resolved by the alternative representation of their intervals. The nonlinear behavior of the resultant parametric model with its nonconvex feasible region is discussed in detail. Constraints used in achieving exact bounds can be relaxed for faster computation and more accurate results, leading to relaxed bounds which can be improved by basis stability. This is particularly useful for a securities company to create more appealing advertisement on its financial products and also for an investor to screen out unfavorable assets from a variety of instruments to spend less time on and reduce expenses incurred in the process of fundamental and technical analysis. The relaxed bounds are compared with the bounds obtained by bilevel and nonlinear approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allahdadi M, Nehi HM (2013) The optimal solution set of the interval linear programming problems. Optim Lett 7(8):1893–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2013) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81(3):637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli Bemporad A, Morari M (2003) Geometric algorithm for multiparametric linear programming. J Optim Theory Appl 118(3):514–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiyakan S, Thipwiwatpotjana P (2019) Mean absolute deviation portfolio frontiers with interval-valued returns. In: Seki H, Nguyen CH, Huynh VN, Inuiguchi M (eds) Integrated uncertainty in knowledge modelling and decision making (lecture notes in computer science, vol 11471). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 222–234

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charitopoulos VM, Papageorgion LG, Dua V (2017) Multi-parametric linear programming under global uncertainty. AIChE J 63(9):3871–3895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek P, Härdle WK, Weron R (2005) Statistical tools for finance and insurance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF (1965) The behavior of stock-market prices. J Bus 38(1):34–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (1996) Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J Finance 51(1):55–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Lai KK, Wang S (2008) Fuzzy portfolio optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein CD, Thapa MN (1993) A reformulation of a mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model. Manage Sci 39(12):1552–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler M, Nedoma J, Ramík J, Rohn J, Zimmermann K (2006) Linear optimization problems with inexact data. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume DM, Dacorogna MM, Davé RR, Müller UA, Olsen RB, Pictet OV (1997) From the bird’s eye to the microscope: A survey of new stylized facts of the intra-daily foreign exchange markets. Finance Stochast 1(2):95–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Inuiguchi M, Chandra S (2014) Fuzzy portfolio optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hladík M (2009) Optimal value range in interval linear programming. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 8(3):283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladík M (2014) How to determine basis stability in interval linear programming. Optim Lett 8(1):375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadan O, Tang X (2019) A bound on expected stock returns. Rev Financ Stud 33(4):1565–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H, Yamazaki H (1991) Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to tokyo stock market. Manage Sci 37(5):519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai KK, Wang SY, Xu JP, Zhu SS, Fang Y (2002) A class of linear interval programming problems and its application to portfolio selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(6):698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST (2011) The mean-absolute deviation portfolio selection problem with interval-valued returns. J Comput Appl Math 235(14):4149–4157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Li W (2013) Strong optimal solutions of interval linear programming. Linear Algebra Appl 439(8):2479–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansini R, Ogryczak W, Speranza MG (2014) Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization. Eur J Oper Res 234(2):518–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin I (2017) What is the expected return on the market? Q J Econ 132(1):367–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathworks (2020) Global optimization toolbox user’s guide. http://www.mathworks.com/help/gads/index.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2020

  • McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton RC (1973) An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41(5):867–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachev S, Mittnik S (2000) Stable Paretian models in finance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramík J, Stavárek D (eds) (2012) An interval linear programming contractor, Silesian University in Opava

  • Rohn J (1993) Stability of the optimal basis of a linear program under uncertainty. Oper Res Lett 13(1):9–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance 19(3):425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Speranza MG (1994) Linear models for portfolio selection and their application to the milano stock market. In: Peccati L, Virén M (eds) Financial modelling. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg, pp 320–333

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trippi RR (1992) A note on modifying the mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model to account for nonstationarity biases. Financ Manage 21(4):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann-Hohlbein M, Pistikopoulos EN (2013) On the global solution of multi-parametric mixed integer linear programming problems. J Global Optim 57(1):51–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue W, Wang Y (2015) A fuzzy multi-objective portfolio selection model with transaction cost and liquidity. In: 2015 11th international conference on computational intelligence and security (CIS), pp 258–261

  • Zhang P (2016) An interval mean-average absolute deviation model for multiperiod portfolio selection with risk control and cardinality constraints. Soft Comput 20(3):1203–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songkomkrit Chaiyakan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaiyakan, S., Thipwiwatpotjana, P. Bounds on mean absolute deviation portfolios under interval-valued expected future asset returns. Comput Manag Sci 18, 195–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-021-00392-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-021-00392-x

Keywords

Navigation