Skip to main content
Log in

Designing flexible loop-based material handling AGV paths with cell-adjacency priorities: an efficient cutting-plane algorithm

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 June 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Automated Guide Vehicles (AGVs) are widely used in material handling systems. In practice, to achieve more space utilization, safety, cost reduction, and increased flexibility, only a limited number of manufacturing cells may be preferred to have direct access to AGV travel paths, and the other cells are chosen to have no or indirect access to them. This paper investigates the problem of determining a single loop in a block layout with two criteria: loop length and loop-adjacency desirability. Unlike the traditional single shortest loop design problem, where all cells must be located next to the loop, the proposed problem considers a more realistic assumption that each cell in the block layout has a different preference with regard to being adjacent to the loop: some cells must be located adjacent to the loop, some must not be adjacent to the loop, and others can be located next to the loop but with different positive or negative priorities. The problem is formulated as a bi-objective integer linear programming model with two exponential-size constraint sets. A cutting-plane algorithm is proposed to solve the model under important methods commonly used to deal with a bi-objective model. The numerical results show the high efficiency of the proposed algorithm in large scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 23 June 2020

    In the original publication of the article, the corresponding author name was incorrectly published as ���Ahamdi-Javid���.

References

  • Ahmadi-Javid A, Ardestani-Jaafari A (2013) On a formulation of the shortest loop design problem. Int J Prod Res 51:323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Javid A, Ramshe N (2013) On the block layout shortest loop design problem. IIE Trans 45:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi-Javid A, Ardestani-Jaafari A, Foulds LR, Hojabri H, Farahani RZ (2015) An algorithm and upper bounds for the weighted maximal planar graph problem. J Oper Res Soc 66:1399–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asef-Vaziri A, Kazemi M (2018) Covering and connectivity constraints in loop-based formulation of material flow network design in facility layout. Eur J Oper Res 264:1033–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asef-Vaziri A, Laporte G (2005) Loop based facility planning and material handling. Eur J Oper Res 164:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asef-Vaziri A, Ortiz RA (2008) The value of the shortest loop covering all work centers in a manufacturing facility layout. Int J Prod Res 46:703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asef-Vaziri A, Laporte G, Sriskandarajah C (2000) The block layout shortest loop design problem. IIE Trans 32:727–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechikh S, Elarbi M, Ben Said L (2017) Many-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms: a survey. In: Bechikh S, Datta R, Gupta A (eds) Recent advances in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Springer, Cham

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtsis D, Tsolakis N, Vlachos D, Iakovou E (2017) Sustainable supply chain management in the digitalisation era: the impact of Automated Guided Vehicles. J Clean Prod 142:3970–3984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ameur W, Neto J (2006) A constraint generation algorithm for large scale linear programs using multiple-points separation. Math Program 107:517–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benevides C (2016) The advantages and disadvantages of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), Conveyco. http://www.conveyco.com/advantages-disadvantages-automated-guided-vehicles-agvs/. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Bertsimas D, Dunning I, Lubin M (2016) Reformulation versus cutting-planes for robust optimization. CMS 13:195–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé JF, Gendreau M, Potvin JY (2009) An exact ε-constraint method for bi-objective combinatorial optimization problems: application to the travelling salesman problem with profits. Eur J Oper Res 194:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostelman RV, Hong TH, Madhavan R, Chang TY (2005) Safety standard advancement toward mobile robot use near humans. In Proceedings of 4th international conference on safety of industrial automated systems (RIA SIAS), pp 26–28

  • Caramia M, Dell’Olmo P (2008) Multi-objective management in freight logistics. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • CMH (2017) Advantages and disadvantages of automated material handling systems, Carolina Material Handling (CMH), Inc. https://www.cmh-inc.com/advantages-disadvantages-automated-material-handling-systems/. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Dantzig GB, Fulkerson DR, Johnson SM (1954) Solution of a large-scale traveling salesman problem. Oper Res 2:393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • De Duzman MC, Prabhu N, Tanchoco JMA (1997) Complexity of the AGV shortest path and single loop guide path layout problem. Int J Prod Res 8:2083–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Croce F, Koulamas C, T’kindt V (2017) A constraint generation approach for two-machine shop problems with jobs selection. Eur J Oper Res 259:898–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M (2006) Multicriteria optimization. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X, Przybylski A (2016) Exact methods for multi-objective combinatorial optimisation. In: Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhedhli S (2006) Service system design with immobile servers, stochastic demand, and congestion. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 8:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani RZ, Laporte G, Sharifyazdi M (2005) A practical exact algorithm for the shortest loop design problem in a block layout. Int J Prod Res 43:1879–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann B (1985) A cutting plane procedure for the travelling salesman problem on road networks. Eur J Oper Res 21:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RL, McGinnis LF, White JA (1992) Facility layout and location: an analytical approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel M, Nemhauser GL (2008) George Dantzig’s contributions to integer programming. Discrete Optim 5:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan J, Book WJ (1997) Minimum aisle width path planning for Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs). In: 5th IASTED international conference on robotics and manufacturing, Cancún, Mexico. Georgia Institute of Technology Library, https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/39333. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Jahn J (ed) (2009) Vector optimization. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeroslow R (1978) Cutting-plane theory: algebraic methods. Discrete Math 23:121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay MG (2012) Material handling equipment. North Carolina State University, Technical reports. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~kay/Material_Handling_Equipment.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Laporte G, Nobert Y (1980) A cutting planes algorithm for the m-salesmen problem. J Oper Res Soc 31:1017–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le-Anh T, De Koster MBM (2006) A review of design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. Eur J Oper Res 171:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Roh MI, Jeong HS (2005) An improved genetic algorithm for multi-floor facility layout problems having inner structure walls and passages. Comput Oper Res 32:879–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zhang Q (2009) Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13:284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand H, Martin A, Weismantel R, Wolsey L (2002) Cutting planes in integer and mixed integer programming. Discrete Appl Math 123:397–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Barbera H, Herrero-Perez D (2010) Development of a flexible AGV for flexible manufacturing systems. Ind Robot Int J 37:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell Z (2018) Alternatives to Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), CONVEYCO. https://www.conveyco.com/alternatives-to-agvs/. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Miliotis P (1978) Using cutting planes to solve the symmetric travelling salesman problem. Math Program 15:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JE (2008) Integer programming: branch and cut algorithms. In: Floudas A, Pardalos PM (eds) Encyclopedia of optimization. Springer, New York, pp 1643–1650

    Google Scholar 

  • Odijk MA (1996) A constraint generation algorithm for the construction of periodic railway timetables. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 30:455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oskoorouchi MR, Ghaffari HR, Terlaky T, Aleman DM (2011) An interior point constraint generation algorithm for semi-infinite optimization with health-care application. Oper Res 59:1184–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przybylski A, Gandibleux X (2017) Multi-objective branch and bound. Eur J Oper Res 260:856–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruzika S, Wiecek MM (2005) Approximation methods in multiobjective programming. J Optim Theory Appl 126:473–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saenz N Jr (2008) Don’t waste your warehouse space. Material Handling Institute (MHI). http://www.mhi.org/media/news/7052. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

  • Sarvanan M, Kumar SG (2013) Different approaches for the loop layout problems: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:2513–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinriech D, Tanchoco JMA (1993) Solution methods for the mathematical models of single-loop AGV systems. Int J Prod Res 31:705–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanchoco JMA, Sinriech D (1992) OSL-optimal single loop guide paths for AGVS. Int J Prod Res 30:665–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Tanchoco JMA (2010) Facilities planning, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis IFA (2006) Survey of research in the design and control of Automated Guided Vehicle systems. Eur J Oper Res 170:677–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye M, Zhou G (2007) A local genetic approach to multi objective, facility layout problems with fixed aisles. Int J Prod Res 45:5243–5264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Ahmadi-Javid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi-Javid, A., Ramshe, N. Designing flexible loop-based material handling AGV paths with cell-adjacency priorities: an efficient cutting-plane algorithm. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 17, 373–400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-018-0383-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-018-0383-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation