Abstract
In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) is an important instrument used to assess dynamic performance. In this paper, to deal with overestimation, to increase rationality, and to reduce dependence on self-assessment results, we equip MPI with the cross-evaluation strategy. The MPI values measured from self and peer points of view are not the same necessarily, even significantly different or strongly inconsistent, and none of them can be ignored. Therefore, to match the results for the two common up-down and bottom-up strategies in building MPI indices, and to retain the multiplicative structure at the aggregate level, we use the geometric mean to aggregate the self and peer MPIs. Because the MPI indices of all units are calculated with several common bundle weights, the resulting values are consistent and therefore comparable. We will show the usability of the proposed method using a real example of 20 branches of an Iranian bank in 2017–2018.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abolghasem S, Toloo M, Amézquita S (2019) Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems. Health Care Manag Sci 22:512–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
Aczél J (1990) Determining merged relative scores. J Math Anal Appl 150:20–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(90)90193-J
Afsharian M, Ahn H (2014) The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1668-5
Afsharian M, Ahn H (2017) Multi-period productivity measurement under centralized management with an empirical illustration to German saving banks. Or Spectr 39:881–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-016-0465-8
Alcaraz J, Ramón N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2013) Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations. Eur J Oper Res 226:516–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.034
Anderson TR, Hollingsworth K, Inman L (2002) The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. J Product Anal 17:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015012121760
Ang S, Chen M, Yang F (2018) Group cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis: an application to Taiwan hotels. Comput Ind Eng 125:190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.028
Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Zofio JL (2013) On the inconsistency of the Malmquist–Luenberger index. Eur J Oper Res 229:738–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.03.031
Arabi B, Munisamy S, Emrouznejad A (2015) A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist–Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. Omega (united Kingdom) 51:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.006
Arocena P, Saal DS, Urakami T, Zschille M (2019) Measuring and decomposing productivity change in the presence of mergers. Eur J Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.048
Asmild M, Baležentis T, Hougaard JL (2016) Multi-directional productivity change: MEA-Malmquist. J Product Anal 46:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0486-y
Balk BM (2001) Scale efficiency and productivity change. J Product Anal 15:159–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011117324278
Balk BM (2015) Measuring and relating aggregate and subaggregate total factor productivity change without neoclassical assumptions. Stat Neerl 69:21–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12045
Balk BM (2016) Various approaches to the aggregation of economic productivity indices. Pac Econ Rev 21:445–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12192
Behdani Z, Darehmiraki M (2019) An alternative approach to rank efficient DMUs in DEA via cross-efficiency evaluation, Gini coefficient, and Bonferroni mean. J Oper Res Soc China. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40305-019-00264-x
Blackorby C, Russell RR (1999) Aggregation of efficiency indices. J Product Anal 12:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007848122559
Carrillo M, Jorge JM (2018) Integrated approach for computing aggregation weights in cross-efficiency evaluation. Oper Res Perspect 5:256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2018.08.005
Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913388
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444
Chen Y (2003) A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries. Int J Prod Econ 83:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00267-0
Chen L, Wang YM (2019) DEA target setting approach within the cross efficiency framework. Omega (united Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.05.008
Chen L, Wang YM, Huang Y (2019) Cross-efficiency aggregation method based on prospect consensus process. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03491-w
Chen L, Huang Y, Li MJ, Wang YM (2020) Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 280:219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.053
Cooper WW, Huang Z, Li SX et al (2007) Efficiency aggregation with enhanced Russell measures in data envelopment analysis. Socioecon Plann Sci 41:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2006.03.001
Deng X, Fang W (2019) A novel mean-variance-maverick DEA prospect cross-efficiency approach for fuzzy portfolio selection. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 37:8113–8130. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190568
Diewert WE, Fox KJ (2017) Decomposing productivity indexes into explanatory factors. Eur J Oper Res 256:275–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.043
Ding L, Yang Y, Wang W, Calin AC (2019) Regional carbon emission efficiency and its dynamic evolution in China: a novel cross efficiency-Malmquist productivity index. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118260
Doyle J, Green R (1994) Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA derivations, meanings and uses. J Oper Res Soc 45:567–578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
Du J, Duan Y, Xu J (2017) The infeasible problem of Malmquist-Luenberger index and its application on China’s environmental total factor productivity. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2603-3
Du J, Chen Y, Huang Y (2018) A modified Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index: assessing environmental productivity performance in China. Eur J Oper Res 269:171–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.006
Essid H, Ganouati J, Vigeant S (2018) A mean-maverick game cross-efficiency approach to portfolio selection: an application to Paris stock exchange. Expert Syst Appl 113:161–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.06.040
Fang L, Yang J (2019) An integrated ranking approach using cross-efficiency intervals and the cumulative prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 136:556–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.053
Färe R, Karagiannis G (2014) A postscript on aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 233:784–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.043
Färe R, Karagiannis G (2017) The denominator rule for share-weighting aggregation. Eur J Oper Res 260:1175–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.008
Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2002) Input aggregation and technical efficiency. Appl Econ Lett 9:635–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110118165
Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2003) On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 146:615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00259-X
Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2005) On Farrell’s decomposition and aggregation. Int J Bus Econ 4:167–171
Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2007) Extending Färe and Zelenyuk (2003). Eur J Oper Res 179:594–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.008
Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2019) On Luenberger input, output and productivity indicators. Econ Lett 179:72–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2019.03.024
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1992) Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: a non-parametric Malmquist approach. J Product Anal 3:85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158770
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117971
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Zelenyuk V (2004) Aggregation bias and its bounds in measuring technical efficiency. Appl Econ Lett 11:657–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485042000207243
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Zelenyuk V (2008) Aggregation of Nerlovian profit indicator. Appl Econ Lett 15:845–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600825584
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Forsund FR, Hjalmarsson L (1979) Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: an application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econ J 89:294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231603
Fox KJ (2012) Problems with (dis)aggregating productivity, and another productivity paradox. J Product Anal 37:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0250-2
Fuentes R, Lillo-Bañuls A (2015) Smoothed bootstrap Malmquist index based on DEA model to compute productivity of tax offices. Expert Syst Appl 42:2442–2450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.002
Grosskopf S, Zelenyuk V (2004) Aggregation of cost efficiency: indicators and indexes across firms. Acad Econ Pap 32:395–411. https://doi.org/10.29628/AEP.200409.0002
Huang MY, Juo JC, Fu T, tan, (2015) Metafrontier cost Malmquist productivity index: an application to Taiwanese and Chinese commercial banks. J Product Anal 44:321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0411-1
Jin Q, Kerstens K, Van de Woestyne I (2020) Metafrontier productivity indices: questioning the common convexification strategy. Eur J Oper Res 283:737–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.019
Kao C (2010) Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega 38:484–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.005
Kao C (2016) Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 255:778–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.019
Kao C (2017) Measurement and decomposition of the Malmquist productivity index for parallel production systems. Omega (united Kingdom) 67:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.04.001
Kao C (2018) Multiplicative aggregation of division efficiencies in network data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 270:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.047
Kao C, Hwang SN (2014) Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. Eur J Oper Res 232:512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.030
Kao C, Liu ST (2019) Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems. Omega (united Kingdom) 83:70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.004
Kao C, Liu ST (2020) A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Omega (united Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102192
Karagiannis G (2015) On structural and average technical efficiency. J Product Anal 43:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-015-0439-x
Karagiannis G (2017) On aggregate composite indicators. J Oper Res Soc 68:741–746. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.81
Karagiannis G, Knox Lovell CA (2016) Productivity measurement in radial DEA models with a single constant input. Eur J Oper Res 251:323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.013
Kerstens K, Van De Woestyne I (2014) Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data. Eur J Oper Res 233:749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.009
Kevork IS, Pange J, Tzeremes P, Tzeremes NG (2017) Estimating Malmquist productivity indexes using probabilistic directional distances: an application to the European banking sector. Eur J Oper Res 261:1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.03.012
Li S, ko, Cheng Y shing, (2007) Solving the puzzles of structural efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 180:713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.010
Li SK, Ng YC (1995) Measuring the productive efficiency of a group of firms. Int Adv Econ Res 1:377–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295790
Li Z, Crook J, Andreeva G (2017) Dynamic prediction of financial distress using Malmquist DEA. Expert Syst Appl 80:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.017
Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 113:1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006
Lim S (2012) Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA. Comput Ind Eng 62:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.010
Lin R, Chen Z, Xiong W (2016) An iterative method for determining weights in cross efficiency evaluation. Comput Ind Eng 101:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.024
Liu JS, Lu LYY, Lu WM (2016) Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega (united Kingdom) 58:33–45
Lo SF, Lu WM (2009) An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 198:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.006
Mavi NK, Mavi RK (2019) Energy and environmental efficiency of OECD countries in the context of the circular economy: common weight analysis for malmquist productivity index. J Environ Manag 247:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.069
Mayer A, Zelenyuk V (2014) Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes allowing for reallocation of resources. Eur J Oper Res 238:774–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.003
Mayer A, Zelenyuk V (2019) Aggregation of individual efficiency measures and productivity indices. In: The Palgrave handbook of economic performance analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, pp 527–557
Mussard S, Peypoch N (2006) On multi-decomposition of the aggregate Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 91:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.01.015
Nesterenko V, Zelenyuk V (2007) Measuring potential gains from reallocation of resources. J Product Anal 28:107–116
Nguyen BH, Zelenyuk V (2021) Aggregate efficiency of industry and its groups: the case of Queensland public hospitals. Empir Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01994-1
O’Donnell CJ, Fallah-Fini S, Triantis K (2017) Measuring and analysing productivity change in a metafrontier framework. J Product Anal 47:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017-0494-6
Pachkova EV (2009) Restricted reallocation of resources. Eur J Oper Res 196:1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.027
Pastor JT, Lovell CAK (2005) A global Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 88:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.02.013
Pastor JT, Asmild M, Lovell CAK (2011) The biennial Malmquist productivity change index. Socioecon Plan Sci 45:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2010.09.001
Pastor JT, Lovell CAK, Aparicio J (2019) Defining a new graph inefficiency measure for the proportional directional distance function and introducing a new Malmquist productivity index. Eur J Oper Res 281:222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.021
Peyrache A (2013) Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: a comprehensive approach. Eur J Oper Res 230:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.034
Peyrache A (2015) Cost constrained industry inefficiency. Eur J Oper Res 247:996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.067
Ramón N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2010) On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations. Eur J Oper Res 207:1564–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.022
Ruiz JL (2013) Cross-efficiency evaluation with directional distance functions. Eur J Oper Res 228:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.030
Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR J 37:174–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379
Sexton TR, Silkman RH, Hogan AJ (1986) Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. New Dir Progr Eval 1986:73–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
Seyedalizadeh Ganji SR, Rassafi AA, Xu DL (2019) A double frontier DEA cross efficiency method aggregated by evidential reasoning approach for measuring road safety performance. Meas J Int Meas Confed 136:668–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.098
Shi H, Wang Y, Chen L (2019) Neutral cross-efficiency evaluation regarding an ideal frontier and anti-ideal frontier as evaluation criteria. Comput Ind Eng 132:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.035
Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2007) Statistical inference for aggregates of Farrell-type efficiencies. J Appl Econom 22:1367–1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.991
Soleimani-damaneh M, Zarepisheh M (2009) Shannon’s entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: method and application. Expert Syst Appl 36:5146–5150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.031
Song M, Zhu Q, Peng J, Santibanez Gonzalez EDR (2017) Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: a method based on Shannon entropy weight. Comput Ind Eng 112:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.07.023
Sun J, Wu J, Wang Y et al (2018) Cross-efficiency evaluation method based on the conservative point of view. Expert Syst 37:e12336. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12336
Tauer LW (2001) Input aggregation and computed technical efficiency. Appl Econ Lett 8:295–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048501750157422
Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Santos Arteaga FJ, Hashemi A (2019) A Malmquist productivity index for network production systems in the energy sector. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03173-7
Ten Raa T (2011) Benchmarking and industry performance. J Product Anal 36:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-011-0214-6
Thanassoulis E, Shiraz RK, Maniadakis N (2015) A cost Malmquist productivity index capturing group performance. Eur J Oper Res 241:796–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.002
Tohidi G, Razavyan S, Tohidnia S (2012) A global cost Malmquist productivity index using data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 63:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.23
Walheer B (2018a) Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995–2015. Eur J Oper Res 269:1013–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.048
Walheer B (2018b) Disaggregation of the cost Malmquist productivity index with joint and output-specific inputs. Omega (united Kingdom) 75:1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.012
Walheer B (2018c) Cost Malmquist productivity index: an output-specific approach for group comparison. J Product Anal 49:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-017-0523-5
Walheer B (2019a) Aggregating Farrell efficiencies with private and public inputs. Eur J Oper Res 276:1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.071
Walheer B (2019b) Malmquist productivity index for multi-output producers: an application to electricity generation plants. Socioecon Plan Sci 65:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.003
Wang YM, Chin KS (2010) Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. In: International Journal of Production Economics. pp 332–338
Wang YM, Lan YX (2011) Measuring Malmquist productivity index: a new approach based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis. Math Comput Model 54:2760–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.064
Wang YM, Chin KS, Luo Y (2011) Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units. Expert Syst Appl 38:10312–10319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.116
Wilson PW (2018) Dimension reduction in nonparametric models of production. Eur J Oper Res 267:349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.020
Wu J, Liang L, Chen Y (2009a) DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega 37:909–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.07.001
Wu J, Liang L, Yang F (2009b) Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game. Expert Syst Appl 36:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.006
Wu J, Liang L, Zha Y, Yang F (2009c) Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross-evaluation. Expert Syst Appl 36:4826–4829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.042
Wu J, Sun J, Liang L, Zha Y (2011) Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Syst Appl 38:5162–5165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.046
Wu J, Chu J, Zhu Q et al (2016) DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology selection. Int J Prod Res 54:5990–6007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1148278
Yang F, Ang S, Xia Q, Yang C (2012) Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 223:483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.001
Yang B, Zhang Y, Zhang H et al (2016) Factor-specific Malmquist productivity index based on common weights DEA. Oper Res 16:51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0185-x
Ylvinger S (2000) Industry performance and structural efficiency measures: solutions to problems in firm models. Eur J Oper Res 121:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00014-4
Yu M-M, Chen L-H (2019) A meta-frontier network data envelopment analysis approach for the measurement of technological bias with network production structure. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03436-3
Zelenyuk V (2006) Aggregation of Malmquist productivity indexes. Eur J Oper Res 174:1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.061
Zelenyuk V (2011) Aggregation of economic growth rates and of its sources. Eur J Oper Res 212:190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.008
Zelenyuk V (2015) Aggregation of scale efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 240:269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.038
Zelenyuk V (2019) Aggregation of efficiency and productivity: from firm to sector and higher levels. CEPA Work Pap Ser
Zelenyuk V (2020) Aggregation of inputs and outputs prior to Data Envelopment Analysis under big data. Eur J Oper Res 282:172–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.007
Zhu J (1996) Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 90:451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00054-2
Zhu N, Liu Y, Emrouznejad A, Huang Q (2017) An allocation Malmquist index with an application in the China securities industry. Oper Res 17:669–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0249-6
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
As indicated by Pastor and Lovell (2005), the global MPI is circular and different from the super efficiency case, where under some conditions the associated LP could be infeasible (Zhu 1996; Seiford and Zhu 1999), the LP in the global MPI is always feasible. In this appendix, we present a global version of the CRMPI proposed in this paper. Following Pastor and Lovell (2005), we assume a global technology that is formed from data of all DMUs in two time periods (all periods in the case which we may have more periods). First, we get two weight vectors for each DMUj, so that \({\text{(u}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} {\text{,v}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} {\text{)}}\) and \({\text{(u}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} {\text{,v}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} {\text{)}}\) are the optimal values obtained by evaluating the unit j at time t and t + 1 relative to the global frontier. Then, we calculate \({\text{E}}_{{_{{{\text{j,}}\,{\text{o}}}} }}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} =\frac{{{\text{u}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} {\text{y}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{\text{t}}} }}{{{\text{v}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} {\text{x}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{\text{t}}} }}\), \({\text{E}}_{{_{{{\text{j,}}\,{\text{o}}}} }}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} =\frac{{{\text{u}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} {\text{y}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{{\text{t + 1}}}} }}{{{\text{v}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} {\text{x}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{{\text{t + 1}}}} }}\), in which \({\text{E}}_{{_{{{\text{j}}\,{\text{,o}}}} }}^{{{\text{k,G}}}} =\frac{{{\text{u}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{k,G}}}} {\text{y}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{\text{k}}} }}{{{\text{v}}_{{\text{j}}}^{{{\text{k,G}}}} {\text{x}}_{{\text{o}}}^{{\text{k}}} }}\) is the cross global efficiency of DMUo in time k = t, t + 1 using optimal weights of DMUj in time k relative to the global technology frontier. By changing k, we obtain two Cross Global Efficiency Matrices (CRGEMs) (Table
16).
Using \({\text{GMPI}}_{{{\text{jo}}}}^{{}} =\frac{{{\text{E}}_{{_{{{\text{j,.o}}}} }}^{{{\text{t + 1,G}}}} }}{{{\text{E}}_{{_{{{\text{j,.o}}}} }}^{{{\text{t,G}}}} }}\) we calculate the cross global MPI matrix (CRGMPIM) (Table
17).
We calculate the CRGMPI score as the average of cross global MPIs.
Since the usual DEA models and global technology are used to calculate the efficiency values used in CGMPI, this index is clearly safe from the impossibility. It is also a circular index, because,
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Homayoni, A., Fallahnejad, R. & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. Cross Malmquist Productivity Index in Data Envelopment Analysis. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 20, 567–602 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-021-00489-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-021-00489-8