Skip to main content
Log in

A decomposition based minimax regret approach for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
4OR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple criteria sorting problem aims to assign objects evaluated on multiple criteria to ordered classes. In inverse multiple criteria sorting problem, the class assignments of objects are known and the decision maker can manipulate the scores of objects on criteria by implementing actions. Selected actions enable the improvement of objects’ final classification. As the decision maker chooses to implement more actions, better classifications may be obtained. The contribution of this paper is under two-folds. First, we decompose inverse multiple criteria sorting problem into two phases, where phase one is a pre-process that computes the minimum cost required for each feasible object-class pair considering the underlying sorting model. Phase two interacts with the decision maker to analyze the classification and budget related trade-offs, through an assignment model generated with the outputs of phase one. The second contribution is using a modified version of a regret-based approach available in the literature. This modification includes a tighter formulation of the regret model, and an interactive solution approach using a mixed integer program for computing the minimax regret value rather than a branch-and-bound approach. We present an example instance to illustrate the developed ideas and conduct computational tests on randomly generated instances. The simultaneous use of the decomposition approach, tighter formulation and the interactive algorithm reduces the computation time significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves M, Clímaco J (2007) A review of interactive methods for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(1):99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1982) Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30:961–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benabbou N, Perny P (2018) Interactive resolution of multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems by incremental elicitation of criteria weights. EURO J. Decis. Process. 6:283–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benabbou N, Leroy C, Lust T, Perny P (2019) Combining local search and elicitation for multi-objective combinatorial optimization. In: 6th international conference proceedings algorithmic decision theory, pp 1–16

  • Boutilier C (2013) Ch 14. Computational decision support regret-based models for optimization and preference elicitation. In: TR Zentall, PH Crowley, (eds) Comparative Decision Making, Oxford University Press: Oxford

  • Boutilier C, Patrascu R, Poupart P, Schuurmans D (2006) Constraint-based optimization and utility elicitation using the minimax decision criterion. Artif. Intell. 170:686–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D, Marchant T (2007) An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, I: the case of two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:217–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D, Marchant T (2007) An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM, II: more than two categories. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:246–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braziunas D, Boutilier C (2007) Minimax regret based elicitation of generalized additive utilities. In: UAI’07: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence p 25-32

  • Braziunas D, Boutilier C (2010) Assessing regret-based preference elicitation with the utpref recommendation system. In: proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC’10) pp 219–228

  • Greco S, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2010) Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207:1455–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2012) Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: UTAGMS-GROUP and UTADISGMS-GROUP. Decis. Support Syst. 52:549–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadzinski M, Ciomek K, Rychly P, Slowinski R (2016) Post factum analysis for robust multiple criteria ranking and sorting. J. Global Opt. 65:531–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy A, Mousseau V, Pirlot M (2011) Learning the parameters of a multiple criteria sorting method. Algorithm. Decis. Theory Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 6992:219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 92:805–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau V, Özpeynirci Ö, Özpeynirci S (2018) Inverse multiple criteria sorting problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 267(1–2):379–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özmen B (2017) An interactive method for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem. MSc Thesis, Izmir University of Economics

  • Özpeynirci Ö, Özpeynirci S, Mousseau V (2020) An interactive approach for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özpeynirci S, Özpeynirci Ö, Mousseau V (2018) An interactive algorithm for multiple criteria constrained sorting problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 267(1–2):447–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T (2015) Decision making and modelling uncertainty for the multicriteria analysis of complex energy systems. PhD thesis, CentraleSupélec

  • Wang T, Pedroni N, Zio E, Mousseau V (2020) Identification of protective actions to reduce the vulnerability of safety-critical systems to malevolent intentional acts: an optimization-based decision-making approach. Risk Anal. 40(3):565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters W, Mareschal B (1995) Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 81:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W (1992) Aide multicritére á la décision dans le cadre de la problématique du tri: méthodes et applications. PhD thesis, LAMSADE, Université Paris Dauphine

  • Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (2002) Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Özgür Özpeynirci and Selin Özpeynirci were visiting researchers at MICS, CentraleSupélec during this study. These authors acknowledge the support of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK-2219 programme), İzmir University of Economics and CentraleSupélec.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Özgür Özpeynirci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özpeynirci, Ö., Özpeynirci, S. & Mousseau, V. A decomposition based minimax regret approach for inverse multiple criteria sorting problem. 4OR-Q J Oper Res 21, 125–149 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-022-00505-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-022-00505-5

Keywords

Navigation