Abstract
The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation was assessed in three Experiments. In Experiment 1a, participants named pictured objects that were strongly associated with a particular color (e.g., pumpkin and orange). Stimuli were presented in a congruent color, incongruent color, or grayscale. Results indicated that congruent color facilitated naming time, incongruent color impeded naming time, and naming times for grayscale items were situated between the congruent and incongruent conditions. Experiment 1b replicated Experiment 1a using a verification task. Experiment 2 employed a picture rebus paradigm in which participants read sentences one word at a time that included pictures of color diagnostic objects (i.e., pictures were substituted for critical nouns). Results indicated that the “reading” times of these pictures mirrored the pattern found in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, an attempt was made to override color diagnosticity using linguistic context (e.g., a pumpkin was described as painted green). Linguistic context did not override color diagnosticity. Collectively, the results demonstrate that color information is regularly utilized in object recognition and representation for highly color diagnostic items.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Barsalou LW, Santos A, Simmons WK, Wilson CD (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: De Vega M, Glenberg AM, Graesser AC (eds) Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Biederman I (1987) Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115–147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
Biederman I, Bar M (1999) One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Res 39:2885–2899. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00309-5
Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for 3D viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1162–1182. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.6.1162
Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1995) Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1506–1514. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1506
Biederman I, Ju G (1988) Surface vs. edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cogn Psychol 20:38–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90024-2
Cave CB, Bost PR, Cobb RE (1996) Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(3):639–653. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.639
Davidoff J, Ostergaard A (1988) The role of color in categorical judgments. Q J Exp Psychol 40:533–544
Grossberg S, Mingolla E (1985) Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures and neon color spreading. Psychol Rev 2(2):173–211. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.173
Hayward WG, Williams P (2000) Viewpoint costs and object discriminability. Psychol Sci 11:7–12. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00207
Livingston MS, Hubel DH (1987) Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J Neurosci 7:3416–3468
Naor-Raz G, Tarr MJ, Kersten D (2003) Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception 32:667–680. doi:10.1068/p5050
Ostergaard A, Davidoff J (1985) Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 11:579–587. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.579
Potter M, Kroll JF, Yachzel B, Carpenter E, Sherman J (1986) Pictures in sentences: understanding without words. J Exp Psychol Gen 115:281–294. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.281
Price CJ, Humphreys GW (1989) The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Q J Exp Psychol A 41:797–828
Ratcliff R (1993) Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychol Bull 114(3):510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
Rossion B, Pourtois G (2004) Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception 33:217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117
Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburg
Spivey MJ, Tyler MJ, Eberhard KM, Tanenhaus MK (2001) Linguistically mediated visual search. Psychol Sci 12:282–286. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00352
Stanfield RA, Zwaan RA (2001) The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychol Sci 12:153–156. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00326
Tanaka JW, Presnell LM (1999) Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Percept Psychophys 61:1140–1153
Tanaka JW, Weiskopf D, Williams P (2001) Of color and objects: the role of color in high-level vision. Trends Cogn Sci 5:211–215. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01626-0
Tanenhaus MK, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Eberhard KM, Sedivy JE (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268:1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
Tarr MJ, Bülthoff HH (1995) Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21(6):1494–1505. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1494
Wurm LH, Legge GE, Isenberg LM, Luebker A (1993) Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:899–911. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.899
Zwaan RA, Stanfield RA, Yaxley RH (2002) Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci 13:168–171. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00430
Zwaan RA, Madden CJ, Yaxley RH, Aveyard ME (2004) Moving words: dynamic mental representations in language comprehension. Cogn Sci 28:611–619
Acknowledgment
This research was supported in part by grant MH-63972 to Rolf A. Zwaan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Therriault, D.J., Yaxley, R.H. & Zwaan, R.A. The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation. Cogn Process 10, 335–342 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0260-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0260-4