Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effects of information type on children’s interrogative suggestibility: is Theory-of-Mind involved?

  • Letter to the editor
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This research was aimed at learning more about the different psychological mechanisms underlying children’s suggestibility to leading questions, on the one hand, and children’s suggestibility to negative feedback, on the other, by distinguishing between interview questions concerning different types of information. Results showed that, unlike the developmental pattern of children’s suggestibility to leading questions, the developmental pattern of children’s suggestibility to negative feedback differed depending on whether the interview questions concerned external facts (physical states and events) or internal facts (mental states and events). This difference was not manifested in response to questions concerning central versus peripheral facts. Results are interpreted in terms of the hypothesis that children’s suggestibility to negative feedback is differently affected by “Theory-of-Mind” abilities than children’s suggestibility to leading questions. Further research is needed in order to test this hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Bruck M, Ceci SJ (1999) The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annu Rev Psychol 50:419–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruck M, Melnyk L (2004) Individual differences in children’s suggestibility. Appl Cogn Psychol 18:947–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candel I, Merckelbach H, Jelicic M, Limpens M, Widdershoven K (2004) Children’s suggestibility for central and peripheral details. J Cred Assess Witness Psychol 5(1):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson S (1992) Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: a critical review. Psychol Bull 112:284–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endres J (1997) The suggestibility of the child witness: the role of individual differences and their assessment. J Cred Assess Witness Psychol 1(2):44–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnilä K, Mahlberg N, Santtila P, Sandnabba K, Niemi P (2003) Validity of a test of children’s suggestibility for predicting responses to two interview situations differing in their degree of suggestiveness. J Exp Child Psychol 85:32–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell JH (1999) Cognitive development: children’s knowledge about the mind. Annu Rev Psychol 50:21–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbo C (2000) Assessing the effects of misinformation on children’s recall: how and when makes a difference. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson GH (1984) A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personal Indiv Differ 5:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hünefeldt T, Lucidi A, Furia A, Rossi-Arnaud C (2008) Age differences in the interrogative suggestibility of children’s memory: do Shift scores peak at 5–6 years of age? Personal Indiv Differ 45:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melinder A, Endestad T, Magnussen S (2006) Relations between episodic memory, suggestibility, theory of mind, and cognitive inhibition in the preschool child. Scand J Psychol 47:485–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner J (1991) Understanding the representational mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebers CM, Schneider W (2000) The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers CM, Bjorklund DF, Schneider W, Cassel WS (2002) Differences and similarities in event recall and suggestibility between children and adults in Germany and the United States. Exp Psychol 49(2):132–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scullin MH, Bonner K (2006) Theory of mind, inhibitory control, and preschool-age children’s suggestibility in different interviewing contexts. J Exp Child Psychol 93:120–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scullin MH, Ceci SJ (2001) A suggestibility scale for children. Personal Indiv Differ 30:843–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro LR, Blackford CL, Chen C-F (2005) Eyewitness memory for a simulated misdemeanor crime: the role of age and temperament in suggestibility. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:267–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch-Ross MK, Diecidue K, Miller SA (1997) Young children’s understanding of conflicting mental representation predicts suggestibility. Develop Psychol 33(1):43–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Thomas Hünefeldt & Clelia Rossi-Arnaud

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Augusta Furia

Authors
  1. Thomas Hünefeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Augusta Furia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Hünefeldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hünefeldt, T., Rossi-Arnaud, C. & Furia, A. Effects of information type on children’s interrogative suggestibility: is Theory-of-Mind involved?. Cogn Process 10, 199–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0269-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0269-8

Keywords