Abstract
How professional skills and schemata do affect cognition, evaluative dimensions and aesthetic perception of pictures? And what about the effect of social elements like a smiling or serious subject pictured? The present study investigates the differences between Experts (photo professionals) and inexperienced individuals in perception and evaluation of photographs. Furthermore, it approaches the influence of different facial expressions (Reis et al. in Euro J Soc Psychol 20(3):259–267, 1990). People with well-developed schemes in photography should evaluate pictures through assessment, while inexperienced people should evaluate pictures through appraisal? N = 118, 60 Experts and 58 inexperienced people were asked to evaluate a set of stimulus pictures throughout: (a) ‘The Circumplex Model of Affect’ (PAQs) to measure 4 affective dimensions; and (b) a Semantic Differential made of 9 couples of bipolar adjectives to measure 2 evaluative dimensions (Aesthetics and Distinctive Features). Results partially confirmed the hypotheses: Experts differ significantly from Non-experts in picture evaluations. Smile arouses more positive evaluations, but only in the inexperienced group. No subject position effects were found. These results are in concordance with previous research about Expert and Non-expert evaluation, and they open new questions about facial expressions studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axellson Ö (2007a) Toward a psychology of photography. Percept Motor Skill 105:411–434
Axellson Ö (2007b) Individual differences in preferences to photographs. Psychol Aesthetic Creativity Arts 1(2):61–72
Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Bonaiuto M, Bilotta E, Fornara F (2004) Che cos’è la psicologia architettonica. Roma, Carocci
Bonnes M, Bonaiuto M (1995) Expert and layperson evaluation of urban environmental quality: the “natural” versus the “built” environment. In: Guerrier Y, Alexander N, Chase J, O’Brien M (eds) Values and the environment: a social science perspective. Wiley, New York, pp 151–163
Devlin K (1990) An examination of architectural interpretation: architects versus non-architects. J Archit Plan Res 7:235–244
Forgas JP (1987) The role of physical attractiveness in the interpretation of facial expression cues. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 13(4):478–489
Langford M (2008) Nuovo trattato di fotografia moderna. Cornaredo (MI), Il Castello editore
Menduini E (2008) La fotografia. Bologna, Il Mulino
Mueser KT, Grau BW, Sussman S, Rosen AJ (1984) You’re only as pretty as you feel: facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Pychol 46(2):469–478
Peron E, Falchero S (1994) Valutazione affettiva di ambienti. G Ital Psicol 7:711–730
Reis HT, Wilson IM, Monestere C et al (1990) What is smiling is beautiful and good. Eur J Soc Psychol 20(3):259–267
Russell JA, Lanius UF (1984) Adaptation level and the affective appraisal of environments. J Environ Psychol 4:119–135
Silvia PJ (2005) Emotional responses to art: from collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Rev Gen Psychol 9(4):342–357
Silvia PJ (2007) Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychol Aesthetic Creativity Arts 1(4):247–249
Conflict of interest
This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulas, V., Troffa, R. & Caddeo, P. Differences between Experts and Non-experts in photographic perception and assessment. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 275–279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0456-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0456-x