Skip to main content
Log in

Processing motion implied in language: eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research on language comprehension has used the eyes as a window into processing. However, these methods are entirely reliant upon using visual or orthographic stimuli that map onto the linguistic stimuli being used. The potential danger of this method is that the pictures used may not perfectly match the internal aspects of language processing. Thus, a method was developed in which participants listened to stories while wearing a head-mounted eyetracker. Preliminary results demonstrate that this method is uniquely suited to measure responses to stimuli in the absence of visual stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann G (2004) Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: the ‘blank screen paradigm’. Cognition 93:B79–B87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann G, Kamide Y (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73:247–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan D, Magnuson J, Tanenhaus MK (2001) Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements. Cogn Psychol 42:317–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard KM, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. J Psycholinguist Res 24:409–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fausey CM, Matlock T (2011) Can grammar win elections? Polit Psychol 32:563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti TR, Kutas M, McRae K (2007) Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33:182–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris CL, Ayçiçegi A, Gleason JB (2003) Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first language than in a second language. Appl Psycholinguist 24:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyönäa J, Tommola J, Alaja AM (1995) Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. Q J Exp Psychol A Hum Exp Psychol 48:598–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvalinka I, Xygalatas D, Bulbulia J, Schjødt U, Jegindø EM, Wallot S, van Orden G, Roepstorff A (2011) Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108:8514–8519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden CJ, Zwaan RA (2003) How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Mem Cogn 31:663–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlock T (2011) The conceptual motivation of aspect. In: Panther K, Radden G (eds) Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder G, Mulder LJM (1981) Information processing and cardiovascular control. Psychophysiology 18:392–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton A, Dale R (under review). Argument disrupts interpersonal alignment

  • Rayner K, Clifton C (2009) Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implication for event-related potential research. Biol Psychol 80:4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salverda AP, Brown M, Tanenhaus MK (2011) A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual-world studies. Acta Psychol 137:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey MJ, Geng J (2001) Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects. Psychol Res 24:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

This supplement was not sponsored by outside commercial interests. It was funded entirely by ECONA, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Roma, Italy

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Huette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huette, S., Winter, B., Matlock, T. et al. Processing motion implied in language: eye-movement differences during aspect comprehension. Cogn Process 13 (Suppl 1), 193–197 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0476-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0476-6

Keywords

Navigation