Abstract
In two visual world eye tracking studies, we examined the activation of subordinate meanings of ambiguous homophones in Hindi and particularly when the sentence context is biased towards the dominant meaning. Participants listened to sentences that were either neutral or biased towards the dominant meaning of the homophone and saw a display containing four pictures. In experiment 1, the display had a shape competitor of the subordinate meaning of the homophone in both neutral and biased conditions along with three unrelated distractors. Experiment 2 had semantic competitors of the subordinate meaning of the homophones along with three distractors. Proportion of fixations to different objects overtime suggested that participants activated the subordinate meanings and oriented their attention to the shape and semantic competitors even when the prior context was biased towards the dominant meaning. Overall, these data from Hindi provide further support to those models of lexical access that assume exhaustive access of both the meanings of an ambiguous homophone. These data suggest even a dominant bias does not eliminate the activation of perceptual and conceptual features of the subordinate meaning.



Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–660
Binder KS (2003) Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: an eye movement examination. Mem Cogn 31(5):690–702
Binder KS, Morris RK (1995) Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:1186–1196
Charles M, Hoang V, George K, Kimberly M (1999) Strength of discourse context as determinant of the subordinate bias effect. Q J Exp Psychol 52:813–839
Chen L, Boland JE (2008) Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative of homophone meaning. J Mem Cogn 44:2–55
Clifton CJ, Staub A (2008) Parallelism and competition in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Lang Linguist Compass 10:234–250
Dahan D, Tanenhaus MK (2005) Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychol Bull Rev 12:455–459
Dopkins S, Morris RK, Rayner K (1992) Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution. J Mem Lang 27:429–446
Duffy SA, Morris RK, Rayner K (1988) Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. J Mem Lang 27(4):429–446
Duffy SA, Kambe G, Rayner K (2001) The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements. In: Gorfein DS (ed) On the consequences of meaning selection: perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 27–43
Huettig F, Altmann G (2005) Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 96(1):B23–B32
Huettig F, Altmann GTM (2007) Visual-shape competition during language mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. J Vis Cogn 15:985–1018
Huettig F, Quinlan PT, McDonald SA, Altmann GTM (2006) Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychol 121:65–80
Jaeger TF, Norcliffe EJ (2009) The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Production. Language and Linguistics Compass 3:866–887
Kambe G, Rayner K, Duffy SA (2001) Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations. Mem Cogn 29:363–372
Kreuz RJ (1987) The subjective familiarity of English homophones. Mem Cogn 15(2):154–168
Leinenger M, Rayner K (2013) Eye movements while reading biased homographs: effects of prior encounter and biasing context on reducing the subordinate bias effect. JCogn Psychol 25(6):665–681
MacDonald MC, Pearlmutter NJ, Seidenberg MS (1994) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychol Rev 101:676–703
Mirman D, Magnuson JS (2009) Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition. Mem Cogn 37:1026–1039
Martin C, Vu H, Kellas G, Metcalf K (1999) Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. Quart J Exp Psychol Sect A 52(4):813–839
Onifer W, Swinney D (1981) Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: effects of frequency, meaning, and contextual bias. Mem Cogn 9:225–236
Pacht JM, Rayner K (1993) The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: evidence from eye movement studies. J Psycholinguist Res 22:251–271
Pattamadilok C, Perre L, Dufau S, Ziegler JC (2009a) On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. J Cogn Neurosci 21(1):169–179
Pattamadilok C, Perre L, Dufau S, Ziegler JC (2009b) On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. J Cogn Neurosci 21(1):169–179
Pollatsek A, Drieghe D, Stockwell L, Almeida RG (2010) The interpretation of ambiguous trimorphemic words in sentence context. Psychon Bull Rev 17:88–94
Rayner K, Duffy SA (1986) Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Mem Cogn 14:191–201
Rayner K, Pacht JM, Duffy SA (1994) Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations. J Mem Lang 33(4):527–544
Rayner K, Cook AE, Juhasz BJ, Frazier L (2006) Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements. Br J Psychol 97:467–482
Sereno SC, O’Donnell PJ, Rayner K (2006) Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32:335–350
Shillcock RC, Bard EG (1993) Competitor effects during lexical access: chasing Zipf’s tail. In: Altmann G, Shillcock R (eds) Cognitive models of speech processing. Erlbaum, Hove, UK, pp 235–275
Simpson GB (1981) Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity. J Verb Learn Verb Beh 20(1):120–136
Simpson GB, Burgess C (1985) Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:28–39
Simpson GB, Krueger M (1991) Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. J Mem Lang 30:627–643
Swinney O (1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re) consideration of context effects. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 18:645–659
Tabossi P (1993) Processing ambiguous words in context. J Mem Lang 32:359–372
Tabossi P, Colombo L, Job R (1987) Accessing lexical ambiguity: effects of context and dominance. Psychol Res 49:161–167
Tanenhaus MK, Lucas MM (1987) Context effects in lexical processing. Cognition 25:213–234
Tanenhaus MK, Lieman JM, Siedenberg MS (1979) Evidence for multiple stages in processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 18:427–440
Tanenhaus MK, Flanigan HP, Seidenberg MS (1980) Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Mem Cogn 8(6):513–520
Tsang YK, Chen HC (2010) Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant—biased context. Psychon Bull Rev 17:875–881
Vu H, Kellas G, Paul ST (1998a) Sources of sentential constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Mem Cogn 26:979–1001
Vu H, Kellas G, Paul ST (1998b) Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Mem Cogn 26:979–1001
Warrington EK, McCarthy RA (1987) Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110:1273–1296
Yee E, Sedivy J (2001) Using eye movements to track the spread of semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Paper presented to the 13th annual CUNY sentence processing conference, Philadelphia
Yee E, Sedivy JC (2006) Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 32(1):1
Yee E, Overton E, Thompson-Schill SL (2009) Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association. Psychon Bull Rev 16:869–874
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Neutral sentences | Biased sentences |
---|---|
1. Usne patrika me bali ka chitra dekha | 1. Usne kaan me bali pehan rakhi thi |
[He/she magazine in bali of photo saw] | [She ear in bali wearing was] |
He/she saw the photo of bali(grain stalk/ear-ring) in the magazine | She was wearing bali(ear-ring) in her ears |
2. Usne kai baar apni kunji ke bare me poocha | 2. Chor ne nakli kunji se taala khola |
[He/she several times his/her kunji about asked.] | [Thief duplicate key by lock opened] |
He/she asked about his/her kunji(key/guide book) several times | Thief opened the lock using duplicate kunji(key/guide book) |
3. kuch der baad lava thanda ho gaya | 3. jwalamukhi se nikla lava patthar ban jata hai |
[Sometime after lava cooled] | [Volcano from coming out lava stone becomes] |
After sometime lava (volcanic eruption/fried grain) cooled down | Lava (eruptions) that comes out from volcano takes form of stones |
4. We sab patri ke bare me baat kar rahe the | 4. Sarkaar ne railway patri ke navinikaran ki yojana banai |
[They all patri about talking were] | [Government railway patri to renovate planned] |
They all were talking about patri(scale/railway track) | Government planned to renovate the patri (railway tracks) |
5. Use aangan me patra pada mila | 5. Use kai mahino purana patra aaj mila |
[He/she courtyard at patra lying found] | He/she several months old patra today received] |
He/she found patra(letter/leaf) lying at the courtyard | He/she received several months old patra(letter) today |
6. Andhere me wah kundli nahi dekh paya | 6. Jyotishi ne kundli dekhkar uska bhavishya bataya |
[Dark in he/she kundli not see could] | [Astrologer kundli looking his/her future told] |
He could not see kundli (horoscope/snake’s posture) in the dark | The astrologer looked to his/her kundli and told about his/her future. |
7. Bacche ki kitaab me bel ka chitra bana tha | 7. Doctor ne use bel ka ras peene ki salah di |
[Chlld’s book in bel of picture drawn was] | [Doctor his/her bel of juice drink to advised] |
There was a picture of bel (fruit/creeper) in child’s book | The doctor advised him/her to drink bel (a fruit) juice |
8. Bato bato me choti ki charcha hone lagi | 8. Himalaya ki choti 8000 meter unchi hai |
[Talks in choti about discussion began] | [Himalaya’s choti 8000 metre high is] |
While talking discussion on choti (mountain peak/hair lock) began | The choti (peak) of Himalaya is 8000 metres high |
9. Usne haath me panna le rakha tha | 9. Bacche ne kitaab se panna faad dia |
[He/she hand in panna holding was] | [Child book from panna tore] |
He/she was holding panna (paper/emerald) in hand | The child tore a panna(page) from the book |
10. Taak ke upar batua rakha tha | 10. Usne pant ki jeb me batua rakha tha |
[Shelf on batua kept was] | [he/she pant’s pocket wallet kept] |
Batua(wallet/cooking utensil) was kept on the shelf | he/she kept batua(wallet) in his pant’s pocket |
11. jab tak wah pakadtaa stri gir padi | 11. Us natak me stri ki gambhir bhoomika thi |
[Until he held stri fell] | [That play in stri of serious role was] |
Until he/ she held stri (lady/iron) fell down | In that play the stri(lady) was in serious role |
12. Use daraaj me golian milin | 12. Use din me dawa ki kai golian khani hai |
[He/she drawer in golian found] | [He/she day in medical of several pills eat has to] |
He/she found golian (pills/bullets)in drawer | He/ she has to take several medical golian(pills) in a day |
13. kaafi dhoondhne par use mohar mil gai | 13. Usne daftar jakar mohar lagwa li |
[Lot searching after he/she mohar got] | [He/ she office went mohar received] |
After searching a lot he/she got mohar (stamp/gold coin) | He/she went to office and got a mohar (stamp)stamped |
14. Wah sham ko taar le aaya. | 14. Aandhi se bijli ka taar toot gaya |
[He/she evening in taar (telegram/wire) brought] | [Strong wind of because electric taar(wire) broke] |
He/she brought taar(wire/telegram) in the evening | The electric taar(wire) broke down because of strong wind |
Appendix 2

Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, R.K., Singh, S. Activation of shape and semantic information during ambiguous homophone processing: eye tracking evidence from Hindi. Cogn Process 15, 451–465 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0622-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0622-4