Skip to main content
Log in

Imageability and semantic association in the representation and processing of event verbs

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relative salience of imageability (the degree to which a word evokes mental imagery) versus semantic association (the density of semantic network in which a word is embedded) in the representation and processing of four types of event verbs: sensory, cognitive, speech, and motor verbs. ERP responses were recorded, while 34 university students performed on a lexical decision task. Analysis focused primarily on amplitude differences across verb conditions within the N400 time window where activities are considered representing meaning activation. Variation in N400 amplitude across four types of verbs was found significantly associated with the level of imageability, but not the level of semantic association. The findings suggest imageability as a more salient factor relative to semantic association in the processing of these verbs. The role of semantic association and the representation of speech verbs are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Barber HA, Kousta S, Otten LJ, Vigliocco G (2010) Event-related potentials to event-related words: Grammatical class and semantic attributes in the representation of knowledge. Brain Res 1332:65–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barber HA, Otten LJ, Kousta S, Vigliocco G (2013) Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain Lang 125(1):47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder JR, Desai RH, Graves WW, Conant LL (2009) Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 1912:2767–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird H, Howard D, Franklin S (2000) Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain Lang 72(3):246–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bushell CM, Martin A (1997) Automatic semantic priming of nouns and verbs in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia 35(8):1059–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza A, Hillis AE (1991) Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature 349:788–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cipolotti L, Warrington EK (1995) Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1(1):104–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D (1982) Why nouns are learned before verbs: linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In: Kuczaj SA (ed) Language development: vol 2, language, thought and culture. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 301–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman M, Koenig P, DeVita C, Glosser G, Alsop D, Detre J, Gee J (2002) Neural representation of verb meaning: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 15(2):124–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb PJ, Kounios J, Anderson JE, West WC (1999) Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(3):721–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellenbach ML, Wijers AA, Hovius M, Mulder J, Multer G (2002) Neural differentiation of lexico-syntactic categories or semantic features? Event-related potential evidence for both. J Cogn Neurosci 14(4):561–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer D, Castillo JG, Talavage T, Patterson S, Wiley C (2008) Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI. Brain Lang 107(1):16–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kounios J, Holcomb PJ (1994) Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20(4):804–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci 4(12):463–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential ERP. Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Federmeier KD (2008) To watch, to see, and to differ: an event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity. Brain Lang 104(2):145–158

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Gerfo E, Oliveri M, Torriero S, Salerno S, Koch G, Caltagirone C (2008) The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: grammatical vs. semantic effects. Neuropsychologia 46(2):764–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatti C, Raggi R, Zonca G, Pistarini C, Contardi A, Pinna G (2002) Verb-noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: the role of word frequency and imageability. Brain Lang 81(1–3):432–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam MM (1985) Principals of behavioral neurology. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Schreiber TA (1998) The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/

  • Nittono H, Suehiro M, Hori T (2002) Word imageability and N400 in an incidental memory paradigm. Int J Psychophysiol 44(3):219–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picton TW, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard SA, Johnson R, Miller GA, Ritter W, Ruchkin DS, Rugg MD, Taylor MJ (2000) Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37:127–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rips LJ, Estin PA (1998) Components of objects and events. J Mem Lang 39(3):309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toglia MP, Battig WF (1978) Handbook of semantic word norms. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler LK, Bright P, Fletcher P, Stamatakis EA (2004) Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42:512–523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco G, Warren J, Siri S, Arciuli J, Scott S, Wise R (2006) The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words. Cereb Cortex 16(12):1790–1796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Conder JA, Blitzer DN, Shinkareva SV (2010) Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 3110:1459–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West WC, Holcomb PJ (2000) Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: an electrophysiological investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 12(6):1024–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Guo C, Ding J, Wang Z (2006) Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words. Brain Lang 96(1):59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xu Xu.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Michael Spivey, University of California, Merced, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., Kang, C. & Guo, T. Imageability and semantic association in the representation and processing of event verbs. Cogn Process 17, 175–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0747-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0747-0

Keywords

Navigation