Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of filled pauses (uh) on the verification of words and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. With this aim, we asked Spanish-speaking students to listen to excerpts of interviews with writers, and to perform a word-verification task and a question-answering task on causal connectivity. There were two versions of the excerpts: filled pause present and filled pause absent. Results indicated that filled pauses increased verification times for words that preceded them, but did not make a difference on response times to questions on causal connectivity. The results suggest that, as signals of delay, filled pauses create a break with surface information, but they do not have the same effect on the establishment of meaningful connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arnold JE, Fagnano M, Tanenhaus MK (2003) Disfluencies signal thee, um, new information. J Psycholinguist Res 33:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auster P (1982) The invention of solitude. Sun Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr DJ, Seyfeddinipur M (2010) The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Lang Cogn Process 25(4):441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn-Gettler CM, Rapp DN (2011) Depending on my mood: mood-driven influences on text comprehension. J Educ Psychol 103:562–577

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan SE, Schober MF (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. J Mem Lang 44:274–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan SE, Williams M (1995) The feeling of another’s knowing: prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. J Mem Lang 34:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton B, Black JB (1985) Understanding expository text: a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton BK, van Dusen L, Glynn SM, Hemphill D (1990) The impact of inferences on instructional text. In: Graesser AC, Bower GH (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cevasco J, van den Broek P (2008) The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Psicothema 20(4):801–806

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cevasco J, van den Broek P (2013) Studies on the establishment of connections among spoken statements: what can they contribute to the promotion of students’ construction of a coherent discourse representation? Psicol Educ 19(2):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenfeld N, Schachter S, Bilous F (1991) Filled pauses and gestures: it’s not coincidence. J Psycholinguist Res 20:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark HH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark H, Wasow T (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cogn Psychol 37:201–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dopkins SC, Klin C, Myers JL (1993) Accessibility of information about goal during processing of narratives texts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19:70–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espin CA, Cevasco J, van den Broek P, Baker S, Gersten R (2007) History as narrative: the nature and quality of historical understanding for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 40:174–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira F, Anes M (1994) Why study spoken language processing? In: Gernsbacher M (ed) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew J, Tauroza S (1995) The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Stud Second Lang Acquis 17:435–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Tree JE (2001) Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory Cogn 29:320–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Tree JE (2002) Interpretations of pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Process 34:37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox Tree JE, Schrock JC (1999) Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: oh what a difference an oh makes. J Mem Lang 40:280–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraundorf SH, Watson DG (2011) The disfluent discourse: effects of filled pauses on recall. J Mem Lang 65(2):161–175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fraundorf SH, Watson DG (2014) Alice’s adventures in um-derland: psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Lang Cogn Neurosci 29:1083–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman SR, Bisanz G (2002) Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: implications for understanding and learning processes. In: Otero J, Leon JA, Graesser AC (eds) The psychology of science text comprehension. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 19–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman SR, Varnhagen CK (1986) Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. J Mem Lang 25:401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser AC, Clark LF (1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Ablex, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser AC, Millis KK, Zwaan RA (1997) Discourse comprehension. Annu Rev Psychol 48:163–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JF (1954) Learning as a function of word frequency. Am J Psychol 67:138–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou P, van den Broek P, Helder A, Karlsson AK (2014) A cognitive view of reading comprehension: implications for reading difficulties. Learn Disabil Res Pract 29:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch W (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd DR (1996) Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie JL (1980) The cement of the universe: a study of causation. Oxford University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler G (1980) Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev 87:252–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (1989) Material-appropriate processing: a contextualist approach to reading and studying strategies. Educ Psychol Rev 1:113–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster KL, Espin CA, van den Broek P (2014) Making connections: linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learn Disabil Res Pract 29(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien EJ, Myers JL (1987) The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory Cogn 15:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez AI, Paolieri D, Macizo P, Bajo MT (2014) The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cogn Process 15:405–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radvansky G, Tamplin A, Armendarez J, Thompson A (2014) Different kinds of causality in event cognition. Discourse Process 51:601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp DN, Gerrig RJ (2002) Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory Cogn 30:779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp DN, Taylor HA (2004) Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:988–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rinck M, Weber U (2003) Who when where: an experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory Cogn 31:1284–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff EA (2010) Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Process 47:130–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin D (1994) Approaches to discourse. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M, O’Connell G (2003) Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. Eur J Cogn Psychol 15(4):607–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VL, Clark HH (1993) On the course of answering questions. J Mem Lang 32:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks JR, Rapp DN (2010) Discourse processing: examining our everyday language experiences. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 1(3):371–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Speer S, Blodgett A (2006) Prosody. In: Traxler M, Gernsbacher MA (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 505–537

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso T, Sperry LL (1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. J Mem Lang 24:595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso T, Suh SY (1993) Understanding text: achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Process 16:3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso T, van den Broek P, Suh SY (1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Process 12:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P (1990) The causal inference maker: towards a process of inference generation in text comprehension. In: Balota DA, Flores d’Arcais GB, Rayner K (eds) Comprehension processes in reading. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 423–445

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P (1994) Comprehension and memory of narrative text: inference and coherence. In: Gernsbacher MA (ed) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 539–588

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P (2010) Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science 328:453–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P, Espin CA (2010) Improving reading comprehension: connecting cognitive science and education. Cogn Crit 2:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek PW, Lorch RF (1993) Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Process 16:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P, Rohleder L, Narvaez D (1996) Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In: Kreuz RJ, MacNealy MS (eds) Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics. Ablex, Norwood, pp 179–200

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Broek P, Rapp DN, Kendeou P (2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Process 39:299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk TA, Kintsch W (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Silfhout G, Evers-Vermeul J, Sanders T (2015) Connectives as processing signals: how students benefit in processing narrative and expository texts. Discourse Process 52:47–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner M, Watson DG (2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: a review. Lang Cogn Process 25:905–945

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walker I, Hulme C (1999) Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(5):1256–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wroblewski K, Vegiersky S (2003) Buenos Aires Corpus of Argentine writers’ interviews. Cultural Institute of Recoleta, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA (1996) Processing narrative time shifts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:1196–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA, Radvansky GA (1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol Bull 123:162–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA, Rapp DN (2006) Discourse comprehension. In: Traxler M, Gernsbacher MA (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 725–764

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan RA, Magliano JP, Graesser AC (1995) Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:386–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina (Multiannual Research Project No. 11220100100121). The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments, and Julieta de Simone for her help in providing reliability ratings.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jazmín Cevasco.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Ekaterina Shutova (University of Cambridge).

Reviewers: Scott Fraundorf (University of Pittsburgh), Jean Fox Tree (University of California at Santa Cruz), Jesse Sparks (Northwestern University, Evanston).

Appendix

Appendix

Example Excerpts of Interviews Parsed in Statements with Target Sentences and Target Words in the Filled Pause Presence Versions (Translated from Spanish)

1

Author 1:

Journalistic writing differs completely from writing novels.

Journalistic writers are always moved by momentary passions,

Today it can be a religious cause,

tomorrow the robbery of a bank,

the day after tomorrow the assassination of a historic figure,

Filled Pause Present Version:

and in the end they are always anthologists of short stories, uh.

Filled Pause Absent Version:

and in the end they are always anthologists of short stories.

TARGET WORD

anthologists

TARGET STATEMENT

Journalistic writers are moved by momentary passions

2.

Author 2:

Writing involves physical sensations that the writer learns to identify.

This is not usually taught or discussed when you take writing classes.

Writers are always taught to consider what they think about a text,

when writing is about experiencing emotions with the body above everything else.

It’s not that critical or interpretative analyses should be ruled out,

Filled Pause Present Version:

but they should not be the center or main focus of the writing process, uh.

Filled Pause Absent Version:

but they should not be the center or main focus of the writing process.

TARGET WORD:

focus

TARGET STATEMENT:

Writing is about experiencing emotions with the body above everything else.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cevasco, J., van den Broek, P. The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. Cogn Process 17, 185–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8

Keywords

Navigation