Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of filled pauses (uh) on the verification of words and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. With this aim, we asked Spanish-speaking students to listen to excerpts of interviews with writers, and to perform a word-verification task and a question-answering task on causal connectivity. There were two versions of the excerpts: filled pause present and filled pause absent. Results indicated that filled pauses increased verification times for words that preceded them, but did not make a difference on response times to questions on causal connectivity. The results suggest that, as signals of delay, filled pauses create a break with surface information, but they do not have the same effect on the establishment of meaningful connections.
References
Arnold JE, Fagnano M, Tanenhaus MK (2003) Disfluencies signal thee, um, new information. J Psycholinguist Res 33:25–36
Auster P (1982) The invention of solitude. Sun Press, New York
Barr DJ, Seyfeddinipur M (2010) The role of fillers in listener attributions for speaker disfluency. Lang Cogn Process 25(4):441–455
Bohn-Gettler CM, Rapp DN (2011) Depending on my mood: mood-driven influences on text comprehension. J Educ Psychol 103:562–577
Brennan SE, Schober MF (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. J Mem Lang 44:274–296
Brennan SE, Williams M (1995) The feeling of another’s knowing: prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. J Mem Lang 34:383–398
Britton B, Black JB (1985) Understanding expository text: a theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Britton BK, van Dusen L, Glynn SM, Hemphill D (1990) The impact of inferences on instructional text. In: Graesser AC, Bower GH (eds) The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 53–70
Cevasco J, van den Broek P (2008) The importance of causal connections in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Psicothema 20(4):801–806
Cevasco J, van den Broek P (2013) Studies on the establishment of connections among spoken statements: what can they contribute to the promotion of students’ construction of a coherent discourse representation? Psicol Educ 19(2):67–74
Christenfeld N, Schachter S, Bilous F (1991) Filled pauses and gestures: it’s not coincidence. J Psycholinguist Res 20:1–10
Clark HH (1996) Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Clark H, Wasow T (1998) Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cogn Psychol 37:201–242
Dopkins SC, Klin C, Myers JL (1993) Accessibility of information about goal during processing of narratives texts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19:70–80
Espin CA, Cevasco J, van den Broek P, Baker S, Gersten R (2007) History as narrative: the nature and quality of historical understanding for students with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 40:174–182
Ferreira F, Anes M (1994) Why study spoken language processing? In: Gernsbacher M (ed) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 33–56
Flowerdew J, Tauroza S (1995) The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension. Stud Second Lang Acquis 17:435–458
Fox Tree JE (2001) Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory Cogn 29:320–326
Fox Tree JE (2002) Interpretations of pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Process 34:37–55
Fox Tree JE, Schrock JC (1999) Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: oh what a difference an oh makes. J Mem Lang 40:280–295
Fraundorf SH, Watson DG (2011) The disfluent discourse: effects of filled pauses on recall. J Mem Lang 65(2):161–175
Fraundorf SH, Watson DG (2014) Alice’s adventures in um-derland: psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production. Lang Cogn Neurosci 29:1083–1096
Goldman SR, Bisanz G (2002) Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: implications for understanding and learning processes. In: Otero J, Leon JA, Graesser AC (eds) The psychology of science text comprehension. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 19–50
Goldman SR, Varnhagen CK (1986) Memory for embedded and sequential story structures. J Mem Lang 25:401–418
Graesser AC, Clark LF (1985) Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Ablex, Norwood
Graesser AC, Millis KK, Zwaan RA (1997) Discourse comprehension. Annu Rev Psychol 48:163–189
Hall JF (1954) Learning as a function of word frequency. Am J Psychol 67:138–140
Kendeou P, van den Broek P, Helder A, Karlsson AK (2014) A cognitive view of reading comprehension: implications for reading difficulties. Learn Disabil Res Pract 29:10–16
Kintsch W (1998) Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ladd DR (1996) Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Levelt WJM (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Mackie JL (1980) The cement of the universe: a study of causation. Oxford University Press, London
Mandler G (1980) Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev 87:252–271
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (1989) Material-appropriate processing: a contextualist approach to reading and studying strategies. Educ Psychol Rev 1:113–145
McMaster KL, Espin CA, van den Broek P (2014) Making connections: linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learn Disabil Res Pract 29(1):17–24
O’Brien EJ, Myers JL (1987) The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory Cogn 15:419–427
Pérez AI, Paolieri D, Macizo P, Bajo MT (2014) The role of working memory in inferential sentence comprehension. Cogn Process 15:405–413
Radvansky G, Tamplin A, Armendarez J, Thompson A (2014) Different kinds of causality in event cognition. Discourse Process 51:601–618
Rapp DN, Gerrig RJ (2002) Readers’ reality-driven and plot-driven analyses in narrative comprehension. Memory Cogn 30:779–788
Rapp DN, Taylor HA (2004) Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:988–1001
Rinck M, Weber U (2003) Who when where: an experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory Cogn 31:1284–1292
Schegloff EA (2010) Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Process 47:130–174
Schiffrin D (1994) Approaches to discourse. Blackwell, Oxford
Singer M, O’Connell G (2003) Robust inference processes in expository text comprehension. Eur J Cogn Psychol 15(4):607–631
Smith VL, Clark HH (1993) On the course of answering questions. J Mem Lang 32:25–38
Sparks JR, Rapp DN (2010) Discourse processing: examining our everyday language experiences. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 1(3):371–381
Speer S, Blodgett A (2006) Prosody. In: Traxler M, Gernsbacher MA (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 505–537
Trabasso T, Sperry LL (1985) Causal relatedness and importance of story events. J Mem Lang 24:595–611
Trabasso T, Suh SY (1993) Understanding text: achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Process 16:3–34
Trabasso T, van den Broek P, Suh SY (1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Process 12:1–25
van den Broek P (1990) The causal inference maker: towards a process of inference generation in text comprehension. In: Balota DA, Flores d’Arcais GB, Rayner K (eds) Comprehension processes in reading. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 423–445
van den Broek P (1994) Comprehension and memory of narrative text: inference and coherence. In: Gernsbacher MA (ed) Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 539–588
van den Broek P (2010) Using texts in science education: cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science 328:453–456
van den Broek P, Espin CA (2010) Improving reading comprehension: connecting cognitive science and education. Cogn Crit 2:1–25
van den Broek PW, Lorch RF (1993) Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Process 16:75–98
van den Broek P, Rohleder L, Narvaez D (1996) Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In: Kreuz RJ, MacNealy MS (eds) Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics. Ablex, Norwood, pp 179–200
van den Broek P, Rapp DN, Kendeou P (2005) Integrating memory-based and constructionist approaches in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Process 39:299–316
van Dijk TA, Kintsch W (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press, New York
van Silfhout G, Evers-Vermeul J, Sanders T (2015) Connectives as processing signals: how students benefit in processing narrative and expository texts. Discourse Process 52:47–76
Wagner M, Watson DG (2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: a review. Lang Cogn Process 25:905–945
Walker I, Hulme C (1999) Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25(5):1256–1271
Wroblewski K, Vegiersky S (2003) Buenos Aires Corpus of Argentine writers’ interviews. Cultural Institute of Recoleta, Argentina
Zwaan RA (1996) Processing narrative time shifts. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:1196–1207
Zwaan RA, Radvansky GA (1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychol Bull 123:162–185
Zwaan RA, Rapp DN (2006) Discourse comprehension. In: Traxler M, Gernsbacher MA (eds) Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 725–764
Zwaan RA, Magliano JP, Graesser AC (1995) Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:386–397
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina (Multiannual Research Project No. 11220100100121). The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments, and Julieta de Simone for her help in providing reliability ratings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Ekaterina Shutova (University of Cambridge).
Reviewers: Scott Fraundorf (University of Pittsburgh), Jean Fox Tree (University of California at Santa Cruz), Jesse Sparks (Northwestern University, Evanston).
Appendix
Appendix
Example Excerpts of Interviews Parsed in Statements with Target Sentences and Target Words in the Filled Pause Presence Versions (Translated from Spanish)
1
Author 1:
Journalistic writing differs completely from writing novels.
Journalistic writers are always moved by momentary passions,
Today it can be a religious cause,
tomorrow the robbery of a bank,
the day after tomorrow the assassination of a historic figure,
Filled Pause Present Version:
and in the end they are always anthologists of short stories, uh.
Filled Pause Absent Version:
and in the end they are always anthologists of short stories.
TARGET WORD
anthologists
TARGET STATEMENT
Journalistic writers are moved by momentary passions
2.
Author 2:
Writing involves physical sensations that the writer learns to identify.
This is not usually taught or discussed when you take writing classes.
Writers are always taught to consider what they think about a text,
when writing is about experiencing emotions with the body above everything else.
It’s not that critical or interpretative analyses should be ruled out,
Filled Pause Present Version:
but they should not be the center or main focus of the writing process, uh.
Filled Pause Absent Version:
but they should not be the center or main focus of the writing process.
TARGET WORD:
focus
TARGET STATEMENT:
Writing is about experiencing emotions with the body above everything else.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cevasco, J., van den Broek, P. The effect of filled pauses on the processing of the surface form and the establishment of causal connections during the comprehension of spoken expository discourse. Cogn Process 17, 185–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0755-8