Abstract
The present study contributes to the discussion on the different components which constitute the intentionality concept about an undesired side effect, focusing on the morality and the skill. Two hundred and forty participants were asked to read a brief story about a car accident, in which it was explained the motivation of the high speed and objective and subjective skill of the agent to drive the car, and to fill in six questions about intentionality, objective risk, mental representation of risk, risk acceptance and blameworthiness for the outcome. The principal results showed that when the motivation is morally negative, people judge the side effect more intentional, also because they make more severe judgments about risk and blameworthiness. Moreover, when people are objectively proficient to perform the action (objective skill) the side effect is considered less risky and intentional and, in the case of a negative outcome, they are judged less severely than if they have a poor ability. Finally, a self-assessment of low skill to make the action (subjective skill) leads people to assess higher risks and, consequently, more intentionality for the side effect. The results are discussed on the basis of the literature about some specific components that make up the intentionality concept.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10339-017-0802-0/MediaObjects/10339_2017_802_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Alicke MD (2000) Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol Bull 126(4):556–574
Amsterdam AG, Bruner J (2000) Minding the law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Astington J (1999) The language of intention: three ways of doing it. In: Zelazo P, Astington J, Olson DR (eds) Developing theories of intention: social understanding and self-control. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, pp 295–315
Astington J (2001) The paradox of intention: assessing children’s metarepresentational understanding. In: Malle BF, Moses LJ, Baldwin DA (eds) Intentions and intentionality: foundations of social cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 85–103
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bratman M (1987) Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Canestrari S (2013) La distinzione tra dolo eventuale e colpa cosciente nei contesti a rischio di base «consentito». Dirit Penale Contemp 1:1–22
Fischer J (1987) Responsiveness and moral responsibility. In: Schoeman F (ed) Responsibility, character, and the emotions: new essays in moral psychology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 81–106
Fiske ST (1989) Examining the role of intent: toward understanding its role in stereotyping and prejudice. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA (eds) Unintended thought. Guilford Press, New York, pp 253–283
Gopnik A, Meltzoff AN (1992) Categorization and naming: basic-level sorting in eighteen-month-olds and its relation to language. Child Dev 63(5):1091–1103. doi:10.2307/1131520
Gopnik A, Meltzoff AN (1997) Words, thoughts, and theories. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Guglielmo S, Malle BF (2010) Enough skill to kill: intentionality judgments and the moral valence of action. Cognition 117(2):139–150. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.002
Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, Hoboken
Knobe J (2003) Intentional action in folk psychology: an experimental investigation. Philos Psychol 16(2):309–324. doi:10.1080/09515080320103373
Knobe J (2015) Philosophers are doing something different now: Quantitative data. Cognition 135:36–38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.011
Knobe J, Burra A (2006) The folk concepts of intention and intentional action: a cross-cultural study. J Cogn Cult 6:113–132. doi:10.1163/156853706776931222
Knobe J, Roedder E (2009) The ordinary concept of valuing. Philos Issues 19:131–147. doi:10.1111/j.1533-6077.2009.00162.x
Lee T, Shapiro M (2014) The interaction of affective dispositions, moral judgments and intentionality. Commun Theory 24:146–164. doi:10.1111/comt.12031
Malle BF (2006) Intentionality, morality, and their relationship in human judgment. J Cogn Cult 6:87–112. doi:10.1163/156853706776931358
Malle BF, Knobe J (1997) The folk concept of intentionality. J Exp Soc Psychol 33(2):101–121. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1314
May J, Holton R (2012) What in the world is weakness of will? Philos Stud 157:341–360. doi:10.1007/s11098-010-9651-8
Mele AR, Moser PK (1994) Intentional action. Nous 28(1):39–68. doi:10.2307/2215919
Nanay B (2010) Morality of modality? What does the attribution of intentionality depend on? Can J Philos 40:28–40. doi:10.1353/cjp.0.0087
Newman GE, De Freitas J, Knobe J (2015) Beliefs about the true self explain asymmetries based on moral judgment. Cogn Sci 39:96–125. doi:10.1111/cogs.12134
Pedrazzi C (2000) Tramonto del dolo? Riv it dir proc pen 43:1265–1279
Phillips J, Misenheimer L, Knobe J (2011) The ordinary concept of happiness (and others like it). Emot Rev 3:320–322. doi:10.1177/1754073911402385
Pizarro DA, Uhlmann E, Salovey P (2003) Asymmetry in judgments of moral blame and praise: the role of perceived metadesires. Psychol Sci 14:267–272. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00041-6
Premack DG, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1(4):515–526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Raney AA (2004) Expanding disposition theory: reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Commun Theory 14(4):348–369. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x
Searle JR (1983) Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Shaver DG (1985) A longitudinal study of moral development at a conservative, religious, liberal arts college. J Coll Stud Dev 26:400–404
Sloman S, Fernbach P, Ewing S (2012) A causal model of Intentionality judgment. Mind Lang 27:154–180. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01439.x
Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic interval for indirect effects in structural equations models. In: Leinhart S (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Sousa PS, Holbrook C (2010) Folk concepts of intentional action in the contexts of amoral and immoral luck. Rev Philos Psychol 1(3):351–370. doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0028-x
Uttich K, Lombrozo T (2010) Norms inform mental state ascriptions: a rational explanation for the side-effect effect. Cognition 116:87–100. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling editor: Brendan Weekes (University of Hong Kong); Reviewer: Francesco Foroni (Australian Catholic University, Strathfield).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nori, R., Gambetti, E., Marinello, F. et al. The attribution of intentionality: the role of skill and morality. Cogn Process 18, 387–397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0802-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0802-0