Abstract
Sustainable interpersonal service relationships (SISRs) are the outcome of a design process that supports situated meaningful interactions between those being served and those in service. Service design is not just directed to simply satisfy the ability to perceive the psychological state of others, but more importantly, it should aim at preserving these relationships in relation to the contextual requirements that they functionally need, in order to be or remain sustainable. However, SISRs are uncertain since they have many possibilities to be in error in the sense that the constructed, situated meanings may finally be proven unsuccessful for the anticipations and the goals of those people engaged in a SISR. The endeavor of this paper is to show that aesthetic behavior plays a crucial role in the reduction of the uncertainty that characterizes such relationships. Aesthetic behavior, as an organized network of affective and cognitive processes, has an anticipatory evaluative function with a strong influence on perception by providing significance and value for those aspects in SISRs that exhibit many possibilities to serve goals that correspond to sustainable challenges. Thus, aesthetic behavior plays an important role in the construction of meanings that are related to both empathic and contextual aspects that constitute the entire situation in which a SISR takes place. Aesthetic behavior has a strong influence in meaning-making, motivating the selection of actions that contribute to our initial goal of interacting with uncertainty, to make the world a bit less puzzling and, thus, to improve our lives, or in other words, to design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Aggarwal P, McGill AL (2012) When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. J Consum Res 39:307–323. doi:10.1086/662614
Arnellos A, Spyrou T, Darzentas J (2007a) Cybernetic embodiment and the role of autonomy in the design process. Kybernetes 36:1207–1224. doi:10.1108/03684920710827247
Arnellos A, Spyrou T, Darzentas J (2007b) Exploring creativity in the design process: a systems-semiotic perspective. Cybern Hum Knowing 14:37–64
Arnellos A, Spyrou T, Darzentas J (2010) Naturalising the design process: autonomy and interaction as the core features. In: Milkowski M, Talmont-Kaminski K (eds) Beyond description: naturalism and normativity. College Publications, London, pp 256–288
Bar M (2009) Predictions: a universal principle in the operation of the human brain. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1181–1182. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0321
Bar-Anan Y, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2009) The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions. Emotion 9:123–127. doi:10.1037/a0014607
Barrett LF (2005) Feeling Is Perceiving Core Affect and Conceptualization in the Experience of Emotion. In: Barrett LF, Niedenthal PM, Winkielman P (eds) Emotion and consciousness. Guilford Press, New York, pp 255–284
Barrett LF, Bar M (2009) See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1325–1334. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0312
Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behav Brain Sci 22:637–660. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99532147
Bechara A (2004) The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage. Brain Cogn 55:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.04.001
Belke B, Leder H, Carbon C-C (2015) When challenging art gets liked: evidences for a dual preference formation process for fluent and non-fluent portraits. PLoS ONE 10:e0131796. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138962
Berger CR (1997) Planning strategic interaction: attaining goals through communicative action. Routledge, Mahwah
Bickhard MH (1993) Representational content in humans and machines. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 5:285–333. doi:10.1080/09528139308953775
Bickhard MH (2000) Motivation and emotion: an interactive process model. In: Ellis RD, Newton N (eds) The caldron of consciousness: motivation, affect and self-organization. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Philadelphia, pp 161–178
Bickhard MH (2006) Developmental normativity and normative development. In: Smith L, Voneche J (eds) Norms in human development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–76
Bickhard MH, Campbell RL (1996) Topologies of learning and development. New Ideas Psychol 14:111–156. doi:10.1016/0732-118X(96)00015-3
Blijlevens J, Carbon C-C, Mugge R, Schoormans JPL (2012) Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: independent effects of typicality and arousal. Br J Psychol 103:44–57. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x
Boholm Å (2008) New perspectives on risk communication: uncertainty in a complex society. J Risk Res 11:1–3. doi:10.1080/13669870801947897
Brashers DE (2001) Communication and uncertainty management. J Commun 51:477–497. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
Brown S, Gao X, Tisdelle L et al (2011) Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. NeuroImage 58:250–258. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
Burge T (2009) Primitive agency and natural norms. Philos Phenomenol Res 79:251–278. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00278.x
Burge T (2011) Some origins of self. J Philos 108:287–315
Campbell RL (2010) The emergence of action. New Ideas Psychol 28:283–295
Carbon C-C (2011) Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Percept 2:708–719. doi:10.1068/i0463aap
Carbon C-C, Leder H (2005) The repeated evaluation technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Appl Cogn Psychol 19:587–601. doi:10.1002/acp.1098
Carver CS (2001) Affect and the functional bases of behavior: on the dimensional structure of affective experience. Person Soc Psychol Rev 5:345–356. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_4
Carver CS, Scheier MF (2013) Goals and emotion. In: Robinson MD, Watkins ER, Harmon-Jones E (eds) Handbook of cognition and emotion, 1st edn. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 176–194
Cela-Conde CJ, Agnati L, Huston JP et al (2011) The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Prog Neurobiol 94:39–48. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.03.003
Chatterjee A (2013) The aesthetic brain: how we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Chong M (2007) The role of internal communication and training in infusing corporate values and delivering brand promise: Singapore airlines’ experience. Corp Reput Rev 10:201–212. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550051
Christensen W (2012) Natural sources of normativity. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 43:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.009
Christensen W, Bickhard MH (2002) The process dynamics of normative function. The Moinst 85:3–28. doi:10.5840/monist20028516
Christensen W, Hooker CA (2000a) An interactivist-constructivist approach to intelligence: self-directed anticipative learning. Philos Psychol 13:5–45. doi:10.1080/09515080050002717
Christensen W, Hooker CA (2000b) Anticipation in autonomous systems: foundations for a theory of embodied agents. Int J Comput Anticip Syst 5:135–154
Clore GL, Palmer J (2009) Affective guidance of intelligent agents: how emotion controls cognition. Cogn Syst Res 10:21–30. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.002
Collins MA, Amabile TM (1998) Motivation and creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 297–312
Craig AD (2009) How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:59–70. doi:10.1038/nrn2555
Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. Springer, London
Dalgleish T (2004) The emotional brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:583–589. doi:10.1038/nrn1432
Damasio A (2000) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York
Damasio A (2010) Self comes to mind: constructing the conscious brain, 1st edn. Pantheon, New York
Damasio A, Carvalho GB (2013) The nature of feelings: evolutionary and neurobiological origins. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:143–152. doi:10.1038/nrn3403
Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex, with a new introduction by J. T. Bonner and R. M. May 1981 edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Decety J, Jackson PL (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3:71–100. doi:10.1177/1534582304267187
Dissanayake E (2009) The artification hypothesis and its relevance to cognitive science, evolutionary aesthetics, and neuroaesthetics. Cogn Semiot 9:136–158. doi:10.3726/81609_136
Dissanayake E (2015) “Aesthetic primitives”: fundamental biological elements of a naturalistic aesthetics. Aisthesis Prat Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’estetico 8:6–24. doi:10.13128/Aisthesis-16203
Dorst K, Dijkhuis J (1995) Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des Stud 16:261–274. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
Duncan S, Barrett LF (2007a) Affect is a form of cognition: a neurobiological analysis. Cogn Emot 21:1184–1211. doi:10.1080/02699930701437931
Duncan S, Barrett LF (2007b) The role of the amygdala in visual awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 11:190–192. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.007
Farrell R, Hooker C (2013) Design, science and wicked problems. Des Stud 34:681–705. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.05.001
Frijda NH (1987) Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cogn Emot 1:115–143
Fujita I, Macgregor KE (2012) Basic goal distinctions. In: Aarts H, Elliot AJ (eds) Goal-directed behavior. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 85–114
Galle P (2011) Foundational and instrumental design theory. Des Issues 27:81–94. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00107
Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11:26. doi:10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854
Gilbert CD, Li W (2013) Top-down influences on visual processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:350–363. doi:10.1038/nrn3476
Glanville R (2007) Try again. Fail again. Fail better: the cybernetics in design and the design in cybernetics. Kybernetes 36:1173–1206. doi:10.1108/03684920710827238
Goel V, Pirolli P (1992) The structure of design problem spaces. Cogn Sci 16:395–429. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(92)90038-V
Griffiths P, Scarantino A (2009) Emotions in the wild: the situated perspective on emotion. In: Robbins P, Aydede M (eds) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 437–453
Grupe DW, Nitschke JB (2013) Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:488–501. doi:10.1038/nrn3524
Hekkert P, Snelders D, Van Wieringen PCW (2003) “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br J Psychol 94:111–124. doi:10.1348/000712603762842147
Heras-Escribano M, de Pinedo M (2015) Are affordances normative? Phenomenol Cogn Sci. doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9440-0
Ishizu T, Zeki S (2011) Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE 6:e21852. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021852
Jacobsen T (2010) Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. J Anat 216:184–191. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01164.x
Kiefer M, Barsalou LW (2013) Grounding the human conceptual system in perception, action, and internal states. In: Prinz W, Beisert M, Herwig A (eds) Action science: foundations of an emerging discipline. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 381–407
Knight FH (1964) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Sentry Press, New York
Krippendorff K (2006) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design, 1st edn. CRC Press, Cambridge
Krippendorff K (2007a) The cybernetics of design and the design of cybernetics. Kybernetes 36:1381–1392. doi:10.1108/03684920710827364
Krippendorff K (2007b) Design research, an oxymoron? In: Michel R (ed) Design research now. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 67–80
Lee J-J, Mattelmäki T, Hyvärinen J (2014) Bringing empathy in service network. In: Freund L, Cellary W (eds) Advances in the human side of service engineering. AHFE Conference, pp 136–145
Lindquist KA, Barrett LF (2012) A functional architecture of the human brain: emerging insights from the science of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 16:533–540. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.005
Lindquist KA, Wager TD, Kober H et al (2012) The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. Behav Brain Sci 35:121–143. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000446
Lo S-K (2008) The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychol Behav 11:595–597. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0132
Love T (2002) Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues. Des Stud 23:345–361. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00043-6
Ma J (2015) When human-centered design meets social innovation: the idea of meaning making revisited. In: Rau PLP (ed) Cross-cultural design methods, practice and impact. Springer, Berlin, pp 349–360
Miller GF (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2:20–25
Moreno A, Lasa A (2003) From basic adaptivity to early mind. Evol Cogn 9:12–30
Moreno A, Mossio M (2015) Biological autonomy: a philosophical and theoretical enquiry. Springer, New York
Mossio M, Saborido C, Moreno A (2009) An organizational account of biological functions. Br J Philos Sci 60:813–841. doi:10.1093/bjps/axp036
Muth C, Hesslinger VM, Carbon C-C (2015) The appeal of challenge in the perception of art: how ambiguity, solvability of ambiguity, and the opportunity for insight affect appreciation. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 9:206–216. doi:10.1037/a0038814
Muth C, Raab MH, Carbon C-C (2016) Semantic stability is more pleasurable in unstable episodic contexts on the relevance of perceptual challenge in art appreciation. Front Hum Neurosci. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00043
Nelson HG, Stolterman E (2012) The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Niedenthal PM, Barsalou LW, Winkielman P et al (2005) Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Person Soc Psychol Rev 9:184–211. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
Norman DA (1986) Cognitive engineering. In: Norman DA, Draper SW (eds) User centered system design: new perspectives on human–computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, pp 31–61
Norman DA (1993) Cognition in the head and in the world: an introduction to the special issue on situated action. Cogn Sci 17:1–6. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1701_1
Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things, 1st edn. Basic Books, New York
Norman DA (2010) Living with complexity. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Norman DA (2013) The design of everyday things: revised and revised edition edition, Expanded edn. Basic Books, New York
Norman DA, Rumelhart DE (1970) A system for perception and memory. In: Norman DA (ed) Models of human memory. Academic Press, New York, pp 19–64
Osman M (2010) Controlling uncertainty: decision making and learning in complex worlds, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex
Padmala S, Pessoa L (2011) Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3419–3432. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00011
Palmer SE (1975) The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Mem Cognit 3:519–526. doi:10.3758/BF03197524
Pessoa L (2008) On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:148–158. doi:10.1038/nrn2317
Pessoa L (2013) The cognitive-emotional brain: from interactions to integration. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Pessoa L (2015) Précis of the cognitive-emotional brain. Behav Brain Sci 38:1–66. doi:10.1017/S0140525X14000120
Pessoa L, Adolphs R (2010) Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:773–783. doi:10.1038/nrn2920
Phelps EA, Ling S, Carrasco M (2006) Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychol Sci 17:292–299. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x
Pourtois G, Schettino A, Vuilleumier P (2013) Brain mechanisms for emotional influences on perception and attention: what is magic and what is not. Biol Psychol 92:492–512. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.007
Prinz JJ (2011) Emotion and aesthetic value. In: Schellekens E, Goldie P (eds) The aesthetic mind: philosophy and psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 71–88
Prum RO (2012) Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 367:2253–2265. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0285
Pullman ME, Gross MA (2004) Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors. Decis Sci 35:551–578. doi:10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.02611.x
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
Roy R (2000) Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 32:289–299. doi:10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00098-1
Savolainen R (1993) The sense-making theory: reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use. Inf Process Manag 29:13–28. doi:10.1016/0306-4573(93)90020-E
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
Schön DA (1992) Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Res Eng Des 3:131–147. doi:10.1007/BF01580516
Schulte-Rüther M, Greimel E (2011) Brain networks supporting empathy. In: Ebstein R, Shamay-Tsoory S, Chew SH (eds) From DNA to social cognition, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 47–62
Schwarz N (2000) Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cogn Emot 14:433–440. doi:10.1080/026999300402745
Singer T, Critchley HD, Preuschoff K (2009) A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends Cogn Sci 13:334–340. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.001
Smith ER, Semin GR (2004) Socially situated cognition: cognition in its social context. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 36:53–117. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8
Valkenburg R, Dorst K (1998) The reflective practice of design teams. Des Stud 19:249–271. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8
Van de Cruys S, Wagemans J (2011) Putting reward in art: a tentative prediction error account of visual art. Percept 2:1035–1062. doi:10.1068/i0466aap
Wasserman V, Rafaeli A, Kluger AN (2000) Aesthetic symbols as emotional cues. In: Fineman S (ed) Emotion in organizations. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 140–166
Wilson TD, Centerbar DB, Kermer DA, Gilbert DT (2005) The pleasures of uncertainty: prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. J Personal Soc Psychol 88:5–21. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.5
Wilson-Mendenhall CD, Barrett LF, Simmons WK, Barsalou LW (2011) Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia 49:1105–1127. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032
Xenakis I, Arnellos A (2013) The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances. Des Stud 34:57–73. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004
Xenakis I, Arnellos A (2014) Aesthetic perception and its minimal content: a naturalistic perspective. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01038
Xenakis I, Arnellos A (2015) Aesthetics as an emotional activity that facilitates sense-making: towards an enactive approach to aesthetic experience. In: Scarinzi A (ed) Aesthetics and the embodied mind: beyond art theory and the cartesian mind-body dichotomy. Springer, Netherlands, pp 245–259
Xenakis I, Arnellos A, Darzentas J (2012) The functional role of emotions in aesthetic judgment. New Ideas Psychol 30:212–226. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.09.003
Xenakis I, Arnellos A (2017) Aesthetics as evaluative forms of agency to perceive and design reality: a reply to aesthetic realism. New Ideas Psychol. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.014
Zamenopoulos T, Alexiou K (2007) Towards an anticipatory view of design. Des Stud 28:411–436. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.001
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Argyris Arnellos since many of the ideas presented here have been shaped during our long and continuous collaboration. I’d also like to thank Claus-Christian Carbon for the valuable comments he made on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Special Section titled “From ‘Einfühlung’ to empathy: Exploring the relationship between aesthetic and interpersonal experience.”
Handling editor: Joanna Ganczarek (Pedagogical University of Cracow); Reviewers: Claus-Christian Carbon (University of Bamberg), Carole Bouchard (Arts et Métiers ParisTech)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xenakis, I. Reducing uncertainty in sustainable interpersonal service relationships: the role of aesthetics. Cogn Process 19, 215–229 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0819-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0819-4