Skip to main content
Log in

Time perception is not for the faint-hearted? Physiological arousal does not influence duration categorisation

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distortions of duration perception provoked by emotion-induced arousal changes are explained by modifications of an internal clock pace. Yet, uncertainty still abounds regarding whether changes of arousal induced by physical exercise yield such temporal distortions. Here, we report two experiments aiming to test separately the impact of, on the one hand, a physical induction of arousal and, on the other hand, a task delay on duration categorisation. In Experiment 1, participants performed a duration categorisation task before and after heart-rate manipulation (increase, decrease, or no change). Duration overestimation was observed after HR manipulation, irrespective of the condition, implying that changes of physiological arousal alone cannot explain the temporal bias observed. In Experiment 2, participants performed the duration task twice without delay or arousal manipulation, and no overestimation was observed. Together, these results suggest that the overestimation observed in the context of a delayed duration categorisation task is related to a distortion of memorised standard durations caused by time lag rather than by a physiological arousal effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

AH and PM are research associates, and MP is a senior research associate at the National Fund for Scientific Research (Belgium). We also thank Fabien D’Hondt (University of Lille) for his comments and suggestions on a previous version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Maurage.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Handling editor: Juliane Britz (University of Fribourg). Reviewer: Marc Wittmann (University of Freiburg).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dormal, V., Heeren, A., Pesenti, M. et al. Time perception is not for the faint-hearted? Physiological arousal does not influence duration categorisation. Cogn Process 19, 399–409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0852-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0852-3

Keywords

Navigation