Abstract
Memories of simple action phrases are retained better following subject-performed tasks (SPT) than verbal tasks (VT), and this superior memory performance of SPT over VT is referred to as the SPT effect. Although research has been conducted on the SPT effect for more than 30 years, how well participants recognize whether they recalled the items successfully and the relationship between item-specific processing encoding and automatic retrieval have not been addressed. The present study used a 2 (instruction: with or without pleasantness rating) × 2 (type of encoding: SPT or VT) between-subject design and applied a “recall-recognition” paradigm to explore the above issues. For the “recall-recognition” performance, the SPT (and the VT with the pleasantness-rating task) produce very poor recognition of the correct recall of the last items (recency effect) and still poorer recognition of the middle items relative to VT alone, indicating that the retrieval process of these items in SPT needs less intention, effort, or monitoring, happens instantly, and involves a more non-obvious memory trace than that in VT alone. This was taken as support for the idea that an emphasis on item-specific information leads to automatic retrieval and thus poor awareness of the prior correct recall. We suggest that the SPT effect can be explained from the perspective of both encoding and retrieval.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Cohen RL (1981) On the generality of some memory laws. Scand J Psychol 22(1):267–281
Cohen RL (1983) The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Mem Cognit 11(6):575–582
Cohen RL (1989) The effects of interference tasks on recency in the free recall of action events. Psychol Res 51(4):176–180
Engelkamp J (1998) Memory for actions. Psychology Press, Hove
Engelkamp J, Seiler KH, Zimmer HD (2005) Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events. Mem Cognit 33(3):371–379
Feyereisen P (2009) Enactment effects and integration processes in younger and older adults” memory for actions. Memory 17(4):374–385
Gardiner JM, Klee H (1976) Memory for remembered events: an assessment of output monitoring in free recall. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 15(2):227–233
Gardiner JM, Passmore C, Herriot P, Klee H (1977) Memory for remembered events: Effects of response mode and response-produced feedback. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 16:45–54
Hainselin M, Quinette P, Juskenaite A, Desgranges B, Martinaud O, De La Sayette V, Eustache F (2014) Just do it! How performing an action enhances remembering in transient global amnesia. Cortex 50:192–199
Helstrup T (1987) One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychol 66(1):37–68
Kausler DH (1989) Impairment in normal memory aging: Implications of laboratory evidence. In: Gilmore GC, Whitehouse PJ, Wykle ML (eds) Memory aging and dementia. Springer, New York, pp 41–73
Klee H, Legge D (1980) Remembering the recall of words. Can J Psychol 34(1):86
Knopf, M. (2005). Memory for subject-performed action events—In search of a memory theory. Unpublished presentation in Stockholm
Koriat A, Ben-Zur H, Sheffer D (1988) Telling the same story twice: output monitoring and age. J Mem Lang 27(1):23–39
Kormi-Nouri R (1995) The nature of memory for action events: an episodic integration view. Eur J Cognit Psychol 7(4):337–363
Kormi-Nouri R, Nilsson LG, Bäckman L (1994) The dual-conception view reexamined: attentional demands and the encoding of verbal and physical information in action events. Psychol Res 57(1):42–46
Kubik V, Obermeyer S, Meier J, Knopf M (2014a) The enactment effect in a multi-trial free-recall paradigm. J Cognit Psychol 26(7):781–787
Kubik V, Söderlund H, Nilsson L-G, Jönsson FU (2014b) Individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases. Exp Psychol 61(5):347–355
Kubik V, Olofsson JK, Nilsson L-G, Jönsson FU (2016) Putting action memory to the test: testing affects subsequent restudy but not long-term forgetting of action events. J Cognit Psychol 28(2):209–219
Mangels JA, Heinberg A (2006) Improved episodic integration through enactment: Implications for aging. J Gen Psychol 133(1):37–65
Mecklenbräuker S, Steffens MC, Jelenec P, Goergens NK (2011) Interactive context integration in children? Evidence from an action memory study. J Exp Child Psychol 108(4):747–761
Mulligan NW, Peterson DJ (2015) Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 41:859–871
Nilsson L-G (2000) Remembering actions and words. In: Craik FIM, Tulving E (eds) The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–148
Nilsson LG, Bäckman L (1989) Implicit memory and the enactment of verbal instructions. In: Lewandowsky S, Dunn JC, Kirsner K (eds) Implicit memory: theoretical issues. Erlbanm, Hillsdale, pp 173–183
Roediger HL, Zaromb FM (eds) (2010) Memory for actions: How different?. Psychology Press, New York
Sahakyan L (2010) Rapid communication environmental context change affects memory for performed actions. Q J Exp Psychol 63(3):425–433
Schatz TR, Spranger T, Knopf M (2010) Is there a memory profit after repeated learning of subject-performed actions? Comparing direct and long-term memory performance level as a function of age. Scand J Psychol 51(6):465–472
Schatz T, Spranger T, Kubik V, Knopf M (2011) Exploring the enactment effect from an information processing view: What can we learn from serial position analyses? Scand J Psychol 52(6):509–515
Schult J, von Stulpnagel R, Steffens MC (2014) Enactment versus observation: item-specific and relational processing in goal-directed action sequences (and lists of single actions). PLoS ONE 9(6):e99985
Seiler KH, Engelkamp J (2003) The role of item-specific information for the serial position curve in free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn, Mem Cognit 29(5):954–964
Spranger T, Schatz TR, Knopf M (2008) Does action make you faster? A retrieval-based approach to investigating the origins of the enactment effect. Scand J Psychol 49(6):487–495
Steffens MC, Jelenec P, Mecklenbräuker S (2009) Decomposing the memory processes contributing to enactment effects by multinomial modelling. Eur J Cognit Psychol 21(1):61–83
Zhao M-F, Zimmer HD, Zhou X, Fu X (2016) Enactment supports unitisation of action components and enhances the contribution of familiarity to associative recognition. J Cognit Psychol 28(8):932–947
Zimmer HD, Engelkamp J (1999) Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks. Mem Cognit 27(5):907–914
Zimmer HD, Helstrup T, Engelkamp J (2000) Pop-out into memory: a retrieval mechanism that is enhanced with the recall of subject-performed tasks. J Exp Psychol Learn, Mem, Cognit 26(3):658–670
Zimmer HD, Cohen RL, Guynn MJ, Engelkamp J, Kormi-Nouri R, Foley MA (2001) Memory for action: a distinct form of episodic memory?. Oxford University Press, New York
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 31371022), the National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant Number BK20170235), and the Philosophy and Social Science Fund in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province (2016SJB190010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
The procedure performed in the study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethnic Committee of Jilin University.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study prior to testing.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G., Wang, L. & Han, Y. The output monitoring of performed actions: What can we learn from “recall-recognition” performance?. Cogn Process 20, 45–53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0889-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0889-y