Abstract
Reading in a foreign language is one of the key defining aspects of successful L2 acquisition. However, research has repeatedly suggested that Arabic-speaking learners of EFL expend a great deal of their reading time in phonologically decoding words letter-by-letter before they are able to access their meanings. To further our understanding of this unique reading difficulty, this study investigated the relationship between the phonological and orthographic lexicons and L2 reading speed among 82 native Arabic learners of EFL. Two measures tapping aural and written modalities of vocabulary knowledge, and a measure of reading speed were administered to the participants. The results showed that phonological vocabulary knowledge correlated more strongly with L2 reading speed (r = .61) than did orthographic vocabulary knowledge (r = .32). Regression modeling also showed that only phonological vocabulary knowledge was able to explain unique variance in learners’ L2 reading speed (R2 = .37). The findings indicate that Arabic-speaking EFL learners do in fact depend greatly on their L2 phonological lexicon when processing English written text. The discussion addresses the importance of developing an orthographic lexicon of suitable size in L2 learners in order to read efficiently in English.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akamatsu N (2003) The effects of first language orthographic features on second language reading in text. Lang Learn 53:207–231
Alderson JC (1984) Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem? In: Alderson J, Urquhart A (eds) Reading in a foreign language. Longman, New York, pp 1–27
Alhazmi K (2018) Arabic EFL learners’ low-level reading difficulties: processing problems or knowledge problems? PhD dissertation, Swansea University, UK
Alhazmi K, Milton J (2015) Phonological vocabulary size, orthographic vocabulary size, and EFL reading ability among native Arabic speakers. J Appl Linguist 30:26–43
Alhazmi K, Milton J (2019) Examining ‘vowel blindness’ among native Arabic speakers reading English from the perspective of eye-tracking. System 80:235–245
Alshaboul Y, Asassfeh S, Alshboul S, Alodwan T (2014) The contribution of L1 phonemic awareness into L2 reading: the case of Arab EFL readers. Int Educ Stud 7(3):99–111
Alsulaimani A (1990) Reading problems in Arab learners of English. PhD thesis, London University, UK
Anglin JM (1993) Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 58(10, Serial No. 238):1–165
Booth P, Clenton J (2020) Vocabulary and listening. In: Clenton J, Booth P (eds) Vocabulary and the four skills: pedagogy, practice, and implications for teaching vocabulary. Routledge, Abingdon
Carlisle J, Stone C (2005) Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Read Res Quart 40:428–449
Coltheart M (1978) Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In: Underwood G (ed) Strategies of information processing. Academic Press, London, New York, pp 151–216
Coltheart M, Rastle K (1994) Serial processing in reading aloud: evidence for dual-route models of reading. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:1197–1211
Deacon SH, Whalen R, Kirby JR (2011) Do children see the danger in dangerous? Grade 4, 6, and 8 children’s reading of morphologically complex words. Appl Psycholinguist 32:467–481
Ehri L (2005) Development of sight word reading: phases and findings. Blackwell, Malden
Fender M (2008) Spelling knowledge and reading development: insights from Arab ESL learners. Read Foreign Lang 20(1):19–42
Grainger J, Ziegler J (2011) A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Front Psychol 2:1–12
Harm M, Seidenberg M (2004) Computing the meaning of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychol Rev 111:662–720
Hayes-Harb R (2006) Native speakers of Arabic and ESL texts: evidence for the transfer of written word identification processes. TESOL Quart 40(2):321–339
Mann V (2000) Introduction to special issue on morphology and the acquisition of alphabetic writing systems. Read Writ 12:143–147
Martin K (2011) Reading in English: a comparison of native Arabic and native English speakers. MA thesis, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Masrai A (2019) Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: evidence for high-, mid-, and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open 9(2):1–13
Masrai A, Milton J (2018) The role of informal learning activities in improving L2 lexical access and acquisition in L1 Arabic speakers learning EFL. Lang Learn J 46(5):594–604
Meara P, Milton J (2003) The Swansea levels test. Express, Newbury
Miller R (2019) English orthography and reading. In: Liontas J, DelliCarpini M (eds) The TESOL encyclopedia of english language teaching. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 1–7
Milton J, Hopkins N (2005a) Aural Lex. Swansea University, Swansea
Milton J, Hopkins N (2005b) Readlex. Swansea University, Swansea
Milton J, Hopkins N (2006) Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners. Can Mod Lang Rev 63(1):127–147
Milton J, Riordan O (2006) Level and script effects in the phonological and orthographic vocabulary size of Arabic and Farsi speakers. In: Davidson J, Coombe C, Lloyd D, Palfreyman D (eds) Teaching and learning vocabulary in another language. TESOL Arabia, UAE, pp 122–133
Milton J, Alexiou T (2009) Vocabulary size and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. In: Richards BJ, Daller HM, Malvern D, Meara P, Milton J, Treffers-Daller J (eds) Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: the interface between theory and application. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 194–211
Milton J, Wade J, Hopkins N (2010) Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In: Chacón-Beltrán R, Abello-Contesse C, Torreblanca-López M (eds) Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Multiling Matters, Bristol, pp 83–98
Nation ISP (2006) How large vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Can Mod Lang Rev 63:59–82
Perfetti CA (1992) The representation problem in reading acquisition. In: Gough P, Ehri L, Treiman R (eds) Reading acquisition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 145–174
Perfetti CA (2003) The universal grammar of reading. Sci Stud Read 7:3–24
Plaut D, Gonnerman L (2000) Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Lang Cognit Process 15:445–485
Qian D (2002) Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: an assessment perspective. Lang Learn 52:513–536
Randall M, Meara P (1988) How Arabs read romance letters. Read Foreign Lang 4(2):133–145
Ryan A (1997) Learning the orthographical form of L2 vocabulary—a receptive and productive process. In: Schmitt N, McCarthy M (eds) Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 181–198
Ryan A, Meara P (1991) The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words. Read Foreign Lang 7(2):531–540
Saigh K, Schmitt N (2012) Difficulties with vocabulary word form: the case of Arabic ESL learners. System 40:24–36
Schreuder R, Baayen R (1995) Modeling morphological processing. In: Feldman L (ed) Morphological aspects of language processing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 131–154
Seidenberg M (2005) Connectionist models of word reading. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:238–242
Seidenberg M (2011) Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In: McCardle P, Miller B, Lee J, Tzeng O (eds) Dyslexia across languages: orthography and the brain-gene-behavior link. Brookes, Baltimore, pp 151–174
Seidenberg M, Gonnerman L (2000) Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends Cognit Sci 4:353–361
Seidenberg M, McClelland J (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol Rev 96:523–568
Seymour P (2005) Early reading development in European orthographies. In: Snowling MJ, Hulme C (eds) The science of reading: a handbook. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 296–315
Share D (2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of over-reliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychol Bull 134:584–616
Stæhr LS (2008) Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Lang Learn J 36(2):139–152
Verhoeven L, Perfetti CA (2011) Morphological processing in reading acquisition: a crosslinguistic perspective. Appl Psycholinguist 32:457–466
Wang M, Koda K, Perfetti CA (2003) Alphabetic and non-alphabetic L1 effects in English semantic processing: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition 87:129–149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling editor: Gladys Nyarko Ansah (University of Ghana).
Reviewers: Fusheini Angulu Hudu (University of Ghana), Mabel Oti-Boadi (University of Ghana).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masrai, A. Phonological and orthographic vocabulary knowledge and processing speed of L2 written text: the case of native Arabic EFL learners. Cogn Process 22, 37–46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00989-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00989-1