Abstract
The fast development of technology and the popularity and prevalence of social media are constantly changing people’s way of living especially their communication patterns. Computer-mediated communication facilitates human contact. Meanwhile, net language becomes widely accepted by computer-mediated communicators. Originating from the text-based form, net language evolves into a multi-modal physical form with a combination of texts, symbols, emojis, pictures and other forms of messages. The multi-modality of net language gives rise to difficulties for hearers or readers of the computer-mediated communication to understand the hidden message due to the ambiguous and polysemic nature of symbols. To clarify hearer’s understanding and ensure the smooth conduct of computer-mediated communication, the conceptual blending theory will be useful in processing the multi-modal net language. With a four-space network and three operation mechanism, the emergent meaning will be constructed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer D, Akert RM (1977) Words and everything else: verbal and nonverbal cues in social interpretation. J Pers Soc Psychol 35:443–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.6.443
Bai Q, Dan Q, Mu Z, Yang M (2019) A systematic review of emoji: current research and future perspectives. Front Psychol 10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
Baym NK (1996) Agreements and disagreements in a computer-mediated group. Res Lang Soc Interact 29:315–346
Brünken R, Steinbacher S, Plass JL, Leutner D (2002) Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. Exp Psychol 49:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1027//1618-3169.49.2.109
Werry CC (1996) Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In: Susan C, Herring SC (eds) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 47–64
Collot M, Belmore N (1996) Electronic language: a new variety of english. In: Herring SC (ed) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspecitves. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 13–28
Crombie P (2020) Faces, hearts and thumbs: exploring the use of Emoji in online teacher-student communications in higher education. J Acad Lang Learn 14(1):30–41
Crystal D (2001) Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Danet B (1993) Books, letters, documents: the changing materiality of texts in late print culture [On-line]. msdanet@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il.
Darics E (2013) Non-verbal signalling in digital discourse: the case of letter repetition. Discourse Context Media 2(3):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.07.002
Fauconnier G (1994) Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fauconnier G (1997) Mapping in thought and language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fauconnier G, Turner M (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognit Sci 22(2):133–187
Fauconnier G, Turner M (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, NewYork
Ferrara K, Brunner H, Whittemore G (1991) Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Writ Commun 8:8–34
Harris RB, Paradice D (2007) An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. J Appl Sci Res 3:2081–2090
Herring SC (1996) Computer-mediated communication: linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam
Hwang Y, Kim HJ, Jeong S-H (2014) Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking. Comput Human Behav 36:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.040
Kira H (1996) Cyberfeminism. In: Herring SC (ed) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 147–172
Kollock P, Smith M (1996) Managing the virtual commons: cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In: Herring SC (ed) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 109–128
Krivec J, Guid M (2020) The influence of context on information processing. Cogn Process 21:167–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-00958-8
Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Langacker R (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Lintean M, Rus V, Azevedo R (2012) Automatic detection of student mental models based on natural language student input during metacognitive skill training. Int J Artif Intell Educ 21(3):169–190. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-2012-022
Logi L, Zappavigna M (2021) A social semiotic perspective on emoji: How emoji and language interact to make meaning in digital messages. New Media Soc 12:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032965
Ma R (1996) Computer-mediated conversations as a new dimension of Intercultural communication between East Asian and North American college students. In: Herring SC (ed) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 173–186
McQuail D (2009) McQuail’s mass communication theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Müller SM, Schiebener J, Brand M, Liebherr M (2021) Decision-making, cognitive functions, impulsivity, and media multitasking expectancies in high versus low media multitaskers. Cogn Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-021-01029-2
Ong WJ (1982) Orality and Literacy. Methuen: New York
Riener A (2017) Subliminal perception or “can we perceive and Be influenced by stimuli that do not reach us on a conscious level?” edited by Myounghoon Jeon, Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human–Computer Interaction. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00019-7
Riordan MA, Kreuz RJ (2010) Emotion encoding and interpretation in computer-mediated communication: reasons for use. Comput Hum Behav 26:1667–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.015
Sherri L, Condon SL, Cech CG(1996) Functional comparison of face-to-Face and computer-mediated decision making interactions. In: Herring SC (ed) Computer-mediated communication linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 65–80
Starcke K, Pawlikowski M, Wolf OT, Altstötter-Gleich C, Brand M (2011) Decision making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task. Cognit Process 12:177–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0387-3
Thomas J (1995) Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing
Wickens CD, Hollands JG, Simon B, Raja P (2016) Engineering psychology and human performance. Routledge, London
Yael S, Ella G, Arik C (2021) Do you get what I mean?!? The undesirable outcomes of (Ab)using paralinguistic cues in computer-mediated communication. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.658844.
Zhao S (2011) Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. Dissertation, University of Sydney
Zhou R, Hentschel J, Kumar N (2017) “Goodbye text, hello emoji: mobile communication on wechat in China. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025800
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all reviewers and editors who participated in this research.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The National Key Research and Development Program of China under the 2018YFC1604000 grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Ethical statement
The author(s) declared that there is no animal or human study in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Editors: Anna Belardinelli (Honda Research Institute Europe, Offenbach), Keping Yu (Guest-editor; Waseda University, Tokyo); Reviewers: Yanwei Zhou (Shaanxi Normal University), Ashok Kumar Das (IIIT, Hyderabad), and a third researcher who prefers to remain anonymous.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Liu, L. Understanding the multi-modal affective expression of net language in computer-mediated communication. Cogn Process 24, 275–288 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01115-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01115-z