Skip to main content
Log in

Use of default option nudge and individual differences in everyday life decisions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People often make inefficient decisions for themselves and the community (e.g. they underuse medical screenings or vaccines and they do not vote) also because of their individual characteristics, such as their level of avoidance or anxiety. In recent years, governments have successfully applied strategies, called “nudges”, to help people maximizing their decisions in several fields; however, the role of individual characteristics has been poorly explored. The present study investigated whether one kind of nudge, the default option (automatic enrolment in a specific plan), can modulate the influence of such individual differences, promoting favourable decisions in different field, such as the medical and civic ones. One hundred and eighty-three participants completed the Trait Anxiety Inventory, the General Decision-Making Styles Inventory and scenarios about health and civic decisions. Participants have hypothetically been enrolled by default or not enrolled in specific plans and had to decide whether adhere or not to the plan proposed. Result showed that the default option drives anxious and avoidant individuals, who usually refuse to make a choice due to their overestimation of negative events’ occurrence, to undergo medical screenings and vaccine and to vote more. Nudge confirmed its effectiveness in favouring better decisions among people according to their individual differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data of this study are openly available in OSF repository at https://osf.io/sfk38/?view_only=9f8ec7a17de34ceba2f28d91e7ee03f8.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by MMZ and EG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MMZ and FG and RN commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micaela Maria Zucchelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report there are no conflict of interests to declare.

Ethical approval statement for research involving human participants

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study has been approved by the Ethic Committee of University (Prot. no. 68248).

Informed consent

Each participant provided the written informed consent for participation and publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Editors: Don Ross (University of Cape Town), Andre Hofmeyr (University of Cape Town); Reviewers: Brian Monroe (University College Dublin), Celeste Campher (University of the Free State, Bloemfontein).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zucchelli, M.M., Gambetti, E., Giusberti, F. et al. Use of default option nudge and individual differences in everyday life decisions. Cogn Process 25, 75–88 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01161-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-023-01161-1

Keywords

Navigation