Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

RoboCup Rescue as multiagent task allocation among teams: experiments with task interdependencies

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses distributed task allocation among teams of agents in a RoboCup Rescue scenario. We are primarily concerned with testing different mechanisms that formalize issues underlying implicit coordination among teams of agents. These mechanisms are developed, implemented, and evaluated using two algorithms: Swarm-GAP and LA-DCOP. The latter bases task allocation on a comparison between an agent’s capability to perform a task and the capability demanded by this task. Swarm-GAP is a probabilistic approach in which an agent selects a task using a model inspired by task allocation among social insects. Both algorithms were also compared to another one that allocates tasks in a greedy way. Departing from previous works that tackle task allocation in the rescue scenario only among fire brigades, here we consider the various actors in the RoboCup Rescue, a step forward in the direction of realizing the concept of extreme teams. Tasks are allocated to teams of agents without explicit negotiation and using only local information. Our results show that the performance of Swarm-GAP and LA-DCOP are similar and that they outperform a greedy strategy. Also, it is possible to see that using more sophisticated mechanisms for task selection does pay off in terms of score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Boffo, F., Ferreira, P. R., Jr., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2007, December). A comparison of algorithms for task allocation in robocup rescue. In M. Dastani & R. H. Bordini (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th European workshop on multiagent systems, pp. 537–548.

  2. Bonabeau E., Theraulaz G., Dorigo M. (1999) Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press, New York, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Camazine S., Deneubourg J.D., Franks N.R., Sneyd J., Theraulaz G., Bonabeau E. (2003) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. dos Santos, F., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2009). Ant-based task allocation among teams. In Proceedings of the eighth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. To appear.

  5. Faltings B., Yokoo M. (2005) Introduction: Special issue on distributed constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence 161: 1–5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Farinelli, A., Iocchi, L., Nardi, D., & Ziparo, V. A. (2006, July). Assignment of dynamically perceived tasks by token passing in multirobot systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7), 1271–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira, P. R., Jr., Boffo, F., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2007, May). A swarm based approximated algorithm to the extended generalized assignment problem (E-GAP). In Proceedings of the sixth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), pp. 1231–1233.

  8. Ferreira, P. R., Jr., Boffo, F., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2008). Using swarm-GAP for distributed task allocation in complex scenarios. In N. Jamali, P. Scerri, & T. Sugawara, (Eds.), Massively multiagent systems, Number 5043 in lecture notes in artificial intelligence, pp. 107–121. Berlin:Springer.

  9. Goldman C., Zilberstein S. (2004) Decentralized control of cooperative systems: Categorization and complexity analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22: 143–174

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ham M., Agha G. (2007) Market-based coordination strategies for large-scale multi-agent systems. System and Information Sciences Notes 2(1): 126–131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hara, T., & Toriumu, F. (2008, July). Robocup rescue 2008 repository—SUNTORI team.

  12. Kalra, N., & Martinoli, A. (2006). A comparative study of market-based and threshold-based task allocation. Technical report, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.

  13. Karmani, R., Latvala, T., & Agha, G. (2007, July). On scaling multi-agent task reallocation using market-based approach. In Proceedings of the first IEEE international conference on self-adaptive and self-organizing systems, pp. 173–182.

  14. Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., & Shimada, S. (1999, October). Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as adomain for autonomous agents research. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), Vol. 6, pp. 739–743, Tokyo, Japan.

  15. Nair, R., Ito, T., Tambe, M., & Marsella, S. (2002). Task allocation in the rescue simulation domain: A short note. In A. Birk & S. Coradeschi (Ed.), RoboCup 2001: Robot Soccer World Cup V, Vol. 2377 of Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 751–754. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  16. Nair, R., Tambe, M., Yokoo, M., Pynadath, D. V., & Marsella, S. (2003). Taming decentralized POMDPs: Towards efficient policy computation for multiagent settings. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-03), pp. 705–711, Acapulco, Mexico, August 9–15. Morgan Kaufmann.

  17. Paquet S., Bernier N., Chaib-draa B. (2004) Comparison of different coordination strategies for the RoboCup Rescue simulation. In: Orchard B., Yang C., Ali M. (eds) Proceedings of the seventeenth international conference on industrial & engineering applications of artificial intelligence & expert systems. Springer, Ottawa, Canada. Berlin, pp 987–996

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paquet S., Chaib-draa B. (2006) Learning the required number of agents for complex tasks. In: Nakashima H., Wellman M.P., Weiss G., Stone P. (eds) Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM Press, Hakodate, Japan. New York, pp 736–746

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Scerri P., Farinelli A., Okamoto S., Tambe M. (2005) Allocating tasks in extreme teams. In: Dignum F., Dignum V., Koenig S., Kraus S., Singh M.P., Wooldridge M. (eds) Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM Press, New York, USA, pp 727–734

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Shmoys, D.B., & Tardos, V. (1993). An approximation algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Mathematical Programming, 62(3), 461–474.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Skinner, C., & Barley, M. (2006). Robocup rescue simulation competition: Status report. In A. Bredenfeld, A. Jacoff, I. Noda, & Y. Takahashi (Eds.), RoboCup 2005: Robot Soccer World Cup IX, Vol. 4020 of Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 632–639. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  22. Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E., & Deneubourg, J. (1998). Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. In Royal society of London series B–Biological sciences, Vol. 265, pp. 327–332.

  23. Yikun, T., Wang, Y., Zhong, S., Zhang, J., Wentong, L., & Baoping, H. (2008, July). Robocup rescue 2008 repository–ZJUBase team.

  24. Zhang W., Wittenburg L. (2002) Distributed breakout revisited. In: Dechter R., Kearns M., Sutton R. (eds) Eighteenth national conference on artificial intelligence. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, USA, pp 352–357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Informática, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Caixa Postal 15064, CEP 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

    Paulo Roberto Ferreira Jr., Fernando dos Santos, Ana L. C. Bazzan, Daniel Epstein & Samuel J. Waskow

  2. Instituto de Física e Matemática, Departamento de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Caixa Postal 354, CEP 96010-900, Pelotas, RS, Brazil

    Paulo Roberto Ferreira Jr.

Authors
  1. Paulo Roberto Ferreira Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando dos Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana L. C. Bazzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Epstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samuel J. Waskow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana L. C. Bazzan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferreira, P.R., dos Santos, F., Bazzan, A.L.C. et al. RoboCup Rescue as multiagent task allocation among teams: experiments with task interdependencies. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 20, 421–443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-009-9087-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-009-9087-8

Keywords