Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Axiomatic considerations of a rule based mechanism for the determination of a building’s egress capability

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When a building is designed it possesses a spatial layout of routes and passageways all of which contribute to the building’s egress capability—a key consideration in the context of health and safety for occupants. In this paper we examine how such a spatial layout can be interpreted as a vital system of egress, which if processed exhaustively by a naïve agent will identify with a measure of egress complexity. We further examine how the established rule-based mechanism for the determination of egress complexity satisfies the generically accepted axioms of complexity and we illustrate some of the algorithms of egress complexity with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby WR (1973). Some peculiarities of complex systems. Cybernet Med 9(2): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson D (1987). Fifty major philosophers. Routledge, London and NY

    Google Scholar 

  • (1991). Fire Safety Science–Proceedings of the Third International Symposium. Elsevier Appl. Sci., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Donegan HA and McMaster TBM (2001). Formal aspects of egress complexity. Math Comp Model 35: 119–128

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Donegan HA, Taylor IR, Christie G and Livesey G (1999). Illustrating some rule based algorithms of egress complexity using simple case studies. J Appl Fire Sci 8(3): 243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Donegan HA and Pollock AJ (1996). A mathematical basis for egress complexity. J Appl Math Lett 9(2): 75–80

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donegan HA, Pollock AJ, Taylor IR (1994) Egress complexity of a building. In: Kashiwagi T (ed) Fire Safety Science–Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium, Int. Assn. Fire Safety Sci., USA: 601–612

  • Düntsch I and Gediga G (2000). Rough set data analysis. Methodos Publishers (UK), Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove AJ, Halpern JY and Koller D (1994). Random world and maximum entropy. J AI Res 2: 22–33

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harary F (1969) Graph theory. Addison-Wesley

  • Jackson AH (1988). Machine learning. Expert Syst 5(2): 132–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (1994). Fire Safety Science-Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium. Int. Assn. Fire Safety Sci., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisko TM and Francis RL (1985). EVACNET : a computer program to determine optimal building evacuation plans. Fire Safety J 9: 211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Folger TA (1988) Fuzzy sets, uncertainty, and information. Prentice-Hall

  • Livesey GE (2003) Advancing egress complexity in support of rule-based evacuation modelling, PhD Thesis, University of Ulster

  • Livesey GE, Taylor IR, Donegan HA (2001) A consideration of evacuation attributes and their functional sensitivities. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, Boston, Interscience Communications: 111–122

  • Oliver P (2001). Diagrammatic reasoning: an artificial intelligence perspective. Artif Intell Rev 15: 63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock AJ, Donegan HA and Taylor IR (1994). Interfacing architectural CAD data with KBS technology. Math Comp Modell 19(9): 17–21

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock AJ (1995) Intelligent Interpretation of CAD Drawings for Building Evaluation, D.Phil Thesis, University of Ulster

  • Quinlan JR (1982) Semi-autonomous Acquisition of patterned based knowledge. In: Michie D (ed) Inductory Readings in Expert Systems. Gordon & Breech, 192–207

  • Shannon CE (1948) The mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423 and 623–656

  • Shields TJ (ed) (1998) Human behaviour in Fire, Proceedings of the First International Symposium, University of Ulster

  • Stenning K and Lemon O (2001). Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning. Artif Intell Rev 15: 29–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Livesey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donegan, H.A., Livesey, G., McMaster, T.B.M. et al. Axiomatic considerations of a rule based mechanism for the determination of a building’s egress capability. Artif Intell Rev 27, 5–19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9053-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9053-2

Keywords

Navigation