Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the dynamic features of recommender systems

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extensive usage of internet is fundamentally changing the way we live and communicate. Consequently, the requirements of users while browsing internet are changing drastically. Recommender Systems (RSs) provide a technology that helps users in finding relevant contents on internet. Revolutionary innovations in the field of internet and their consequent effects on users have activated the research in the area of recommender systems. This paper presents issues related to the changing needs of user requirements as well as changes in the systems’ contents. The RSs involving said issues are termed as Dynamic Recommender Systems (DRSs). The paper first defines the concept of DRS and explores the various parameters that contribute in developing a DRS. The paper also discusses the scope of contributions in this field and concludes citing in possible extensions that can improve the dynamic qualities of recommendation systems in future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbassi Z, Amer-Yahia S, Lakshmanan LVS, Vassilvitskii S, Yu C (2009) Getting recommender systems to think outside the box. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems RecSys 09, ACM Press, pp 285–288

  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6): 734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2001) Extending recommender systems: a multidimensional approach. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI01 workshop on intelligent techniques for web personalization (ITWP2001). Seattle, pp 4–6

  • Adomavicius G, Kwon Y (2008) Overcoming accuracy-diversity tradeoff in recommender systems: a variance-based approach. In: Proceedings of the 18th workshop on information technology and systems (WITS’08), Paris

  • Balabanovic M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3): 66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraglia R, Merlo F, Silvestri F (2004) An effective recommender system for highly dynamic and large web sites. In: Proceedings of the 8th European conference on principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases (PKDD ’04). Springer, New York, pp 531–533

  • Baltrunas L, Ricci F (2009) Context-based splitting of item ratings in collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 09), New York, pp 245–248

  • Baltrunas L, Ludwig B, Peer S, Ricci F (2012) Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 16(5): 507–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J, Lanning S (2007) The netflix prize. In: Proceedings of KDD cup and workshop

  • Burke R (2007) Hybrid web recommender systems. In: Brusilovsky A, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive web, vol 4321. Springer, Berlin, pp 377–408

  • Burke R (2010) Evaluating the dynamic properties of recommendation algorithms. In: 4th ACM conference on recommender systems, pp 225–228

  • Carmagnola F, Vernero F, Grillo P (2009) SoNARS: a social networks-based algorithm for social recommender systems. In: Geert- Jan Houben, Gord Mccalla, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro (eds) Proceedings of the 17th international conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization: formerly UM and AH (UMAP ‘09). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 223–234

  • Castro-Herrera C, Cleland-Huang J, Mobasher B (2009) A recommender system for dynamically evolving online forums. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 09), New York, pp 213–216

  • Celma Ò, Herrera P (2008) A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 08), Lausanne, pp 179–186

  • Chandramouli B, Levandoski JJ, Eldawy A, Mokbel MF (2011) StreamRec: a real-time recommender system. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data (SIGMOD ’11). ACM, New York, pp 1243–1246

  • Chen T, Han W (2007) Content recommendation system based on private dynamic user profile. Mach Learn 4: 2112–2118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu Y-S, Lin K-H, Chen J-S (2011) A social network-based serendipity recommender system. In: International symposium on intelligent signal processing and communications systems ISPACS, pp 1–5

  • Cho YB, Cho YH, Kim SH (2005) Mining changes in customer buying behavior for collaborative recommendations. Expert Syst Appl 28(2): 359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu W, Park ST (2009) Personalized recommendation on dynamic content using predictive Bilinear Models. In: 18th international WWW conference, Madrid, pp 691–706

  • Dai H, Mobasher B (2003) A road map to more effective web personalization: integrating domain knowledge with web usage mining. In: Proceedings of the international conference on internet computing, Las Vegas, pp 1–8

  • De Pessemier T, Dooms S, Deryckere T, Martens L (2010) Time dependency of data quality for collaborative filtering algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys ‘10), New York, pp 281–284

  • Demir GN, Sima Uyar S, Oguducu S (2007) Graph-based Sequence clustering through multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for web recommender systems. In: Thierens D (ed) Computer engineering, vol 2, pp 1943–1950

  • Ding Y, Li X, Orlowska M (2006) Recency-based collaborative filtering. In: Gillian Dobbie and James Bailey (eds) Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Database Conference (ADC ’06), vol 49. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australila, pp 99–107

  • Fernando D, Enrique C, Pedro G, Campos G, Alejandro B (2010) Movie recommendations based in explicit and implicit features extracted from the Filmtipset dataset. In: Proceedings of the workshop on context-aware movie recommendation (CAMRa ’10). New York, pp 45–52

  • Gauch S, Speretta M. Chandramouli A, Micarelli A (2007) User profiles for personalized information access. In: Peter Brusilovsky, Alfred Kobsa, and Wolfgang Nejdl (eds) The adaptive web. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 4321:54–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer-Schulz A (2000) myvu: a next generation recommender system based on observed consumer behavior and interactive evolutionary algorithms. In: Gaul W, Opitz O, Schader M (eds). Data analysis: scientific modeling and practical applications, studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 447–457

  • Gonzalez G, De La Rosa JL, Montaner M, Delfin S (2007) Embedding emotional context in recommender systems. In 2007 IEEE 23rd international conference on data engineering workshop, pp 845–852

  • Guy I, Jaimes A, Agull P, Moore P, Nandy P, Nastar C, Schinzel H (2010) Will recommenders kill search?: recommender systems—an industry perspective. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys ’10). ACM, New York, pp 7–12

  • Ge M, Delgado-Battenfeld C, Jannach D (2010) Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on recommender system, pp 257–260

  • Herlocker JL, Konstan JA, Terveen LG, Riedl JT (2004) Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(1): 5–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-L, Huang W-L (2009) Handling sequential pattern decay: developing a two-stage collaborative recommender system. Electron Commer Res Appl 8(3): 117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu R, Pearl P (2009) Acceptance issues of personality-based recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys ’09), New York, pp 221–224

  • Hurley N, Zhang M (2011) Novelty and diversity in top-N recommendation— analysis and evaluation. ACM Trans Internet Technol 10(4): 30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iaquinta L, Gemmis M, Lops P, Semeraro G, Molino P (2010) Can a recommender system induce serendipitous encounters? E-commerce, IN-TECH, Vienna, pp 229–246

  • Jambor T, Wang J, Lathia N (2012) Using control theory for stable and efficient recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web (WWW ’12). ACM, New York, pp 11–20

  • Jancsary J, Neubarth F, Trost F (2010) Towards context-aware personalization and a broad perspective on the semantics of news articles. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems (RecSys ’10). New York, pp 289–292

  • Kahng M, Lee S, Lee S (2011) Ranking in context-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on world wide web (WWW’11). ACM, New York, pp 65–66

  • Khoshneshin M, Street WN (2010) Incremental collaborative filtering via evolutionary. In: 4th ACM conference on recommender systems, pp 325–328

  • Konstan JA, Riedl J (2012) Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience. User Model User Adapt Interact 22(1–2): 101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren Y (2009) Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD ’09). New York, pp 447–456

  • Kwon Y (2008) Improving top-n recommendation techniques using rating variance. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 08), Lausanne, pp 307–310

  • Kwon H-J, Hong K-S (2012) Personalized real-time location-tagged contents recommender system based on mobile social networks. In: IEEE international conference on consumer electronics ICCE, pp 558–559

  • Lathia N, Hailes S, Capra V (2008) kNN CF: a temporal social network. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems, Lausanne, pp 227–234

  • Lathia N, Hailes S, Capra L, Amatriain X (2010) Temporal diversity in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR ’10). New York, USA, pp 210–217

  • Lathia N, Hailes S, Capra L (2009) Temporal collaborative filtering with adaptive neighbourhoods. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR 09), pp 796–797

  • Lee T, Park Y (2008) A time-based approach to effective recommender systems using implicit feedback. Expert Syst Appl 34(4): 3055–3062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman H (1995) Letizia: an agent that assists web browsing. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI-95). Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc., San Mateo, pp 924–929

  • Linden G, Smith B, York J (2003) Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput 7(1):76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Manikrao US, Prabhakar TV (2005) Dynamic selection of web services with recommendation system. In: International conference on next generation web services practices (NWeSP05), pp 117–121

  • Marinho Balby L, Nanopoulos A, Schmidt-thieme L (2011) Social tagging recommender systems. In: Francesco Ricci et al.(ed) Recommender systems handbook. Springer, pp 615–644

  • Min SHm, Han I (2005) Detection of the customer time-variant pattern for improving recommender systems. Expert Syst Appl 28(2): 189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenic D (1999) Text-learning and related intelligent agents: a survey. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 14(4):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson T, Bitton E, Goldberg K (2007) Eigentaste 5.0: constant-time adaptability in a recommender system using item clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on recommender systems, pp 149–152

  • Oku K, Hattori F (2011) Fusion-based recommender system. In: ACM RecSys workshop on novelty and diversity in recommender systems (DivRS), pp 1–7

  • Panniello U, Tuzhilin A, Gorgoglione M, Palmisano C, Pedone A (2009) Experimental comparison of pre- vs. post-filtering approaches in context-aware recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems, pp 3–6

  • Park Y-J, Tuzhilin A (2008) The long tail of recommender systems and how to leverage it. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 08), Lausanne, pp 11–18, October 2008

  • Pronk V, Verhaegh W, Proidl A, Tiemann M (2007) Incorporating user control into recommender systems based on naive bayesian classification. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 07), Minneapolis, pp 73–80

  • Pu P, Bridge DG, Mobasher B, Ricci F (eds) Proceedings of 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems 2008

  • Resnick P, Varian HR (1997) Recommender systems. Commun ACM 40(3): 56–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said A (2010) Identifying and utilizing contextual data in hybrid recommender systems. Im: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on recommender systems, Barcelona, pp 365–368

  • Schafer JB, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) Ecommerce recommendation application. Data Min Knowl Discov 5(1/2): 115–153

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer JB, Konstan J, Riedi J (1999) Recommender systems in e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC’99). ACM, New York, pp 158–166

  • Shani G, Gunawardana A (2009) Evaluating recommendation systems. In: Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, Kantor PB (eds) Springer, Berlin, pp 1–41

  • Shneiderman B (1997) Direct manipulation for comprehensible, predictable, and controllable user interfaces. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI97), Orlando, pp 33–39

  • Tang TY, Winoto P, Chan K (2003) Scaling down candidate sets based on the temporal feature of items for improved hybrid recommendations. In: Bamshad Mobasher and Sarabjot Singh Anand (eds) Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on intelligent techniques for web personalization (ITWP’03). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 169–186

  • Teppan EC (2008) Implications of psychological phenomenons for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems RecSys 08, Lausanne, pp 323–326

  • Tintarev N, Masthoff J (2007) A survey of explanations in recommender systems. 2007 IEEE 23rd international conference on data engineering workshop, vol 7, pp 801–810

  • Ujjin S, Bentley PJ (2003) Particle swarm optimization recommender system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium 2003 (SIS 2003), Indianapolis, pp 124–131

  • Vargas S (2011) New approaches to diversity and novelty in recommender systems. In: Fourth BCS-IRSG symposium on future directions in information access (FDIA 2011), Koblenz, 31 August 2011

  • Vargas S, Castells P (2011) Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys ’11). ACM, New York, pp 109–116

  • Vellino A, Zeber D (2007) A hybrid, multi-dimensional recommender for journal articles in a scientific digital library. In: 2007 IEEEWICACM international conferences on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology workshops, pp 111–114

  • Woerndl W, Groh G (2007) Utilizing physical and social context to improve recommender systems. In: 2007 IEEEWICACM international conferences on web intelligence and intelligent agent technology workshops, pp 123–128

  • Zhang M (2009) Enhancing diversity in top-N recommendation. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys 09), pp 397–400

  • Zhang M, Hurley N (2008) Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys ’08). ACM, New York, pp 123–130

  • Zhou X, Xu Y, Li Y, Josang A, Cox C (2011) The state-of-the-art in personalized recommender systems for social networking. Artif Intell Rev 37(2): 119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler C-N, Mcnee SM, Konstan JA, Lausen G (2005) Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on world wide web WWW 05, pp 22–32

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chhavi Rana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rana, C., Jain, S.K. A study of the dynamic features of recommender systems. Artif Intell Rev 43, 141–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9359-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9359-6

Keywords

Navigation