Skip to main content
Log in

A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning has proved to be a fruitful method in various tasks in the field of artificial intelligence during the last several years. Recent works have focused on deep reinforcement learning beyond single-agent scenarios, with more consideration of multi-agent settings. The main goal of this paper is to provide a detailed and systematic overview of multi-agent deep reinforcement learning methods in views of challenges and applications. Specifically, the preliminary knowledge is introduced first for a better understanding of this field. Then, a taxonomy of challenges is proposed and the corresponding structures and representative methods are introduced. Finally, some applications and interesting future opportunities for multi-agent deep reinforcement learning are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig3
Fig.4
Fig. 5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abouheaf M, Gueaieb W (2017) Multi-agent reinforcement learning approach based on reduced value function approximations. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors (IRIS) pp 111–116. IEEE

  • Albrecht SV, Stone P (2018) Autonomous agents modeling other agents: a comprehensive survey and open problems. Artif Intell 258:66–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bard N, Foerster JN, Chandar S, Burch N, Lanctot M, Song HF, Dunning I (2020) The hanabi challenge: a new frontier for ai research. Artif Intell 280:103216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling M, McCracken P (2005) Coordination and adaptation in impromptu teams. In: 1995 AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 5, pp 53–58

  • Buşoniu L, Babuška R, De Schutter B (2010) Multi-agent reinforcement learning: an overview. In: Srinivasan D, Jain LC (eds) Innovations in multi-agent systems and applications-1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 183–221

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo JA, Dusparic I (2018) Heterogeneous multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for traffic lights control. In AICS pp 2–13

  • Camerer CF, Ho TH, Chong JK (2004) Behavioural game theory: thinking, learning and teaching. In Advances in understanding strategic behavior. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 120–180

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel D, Markovitch S (1996) Incorporating opponent models into adversary search. In AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1, pp 120–125

  • Chen W, Zhou K, Chen C (2016) Real-time bus holding control on a transit corridor based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. In 2016 IEEE 19th International conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC) pp 100–106. IEEE

  • Christiano PF, Leike J, Brown T, Martic M, Legg S, Amodei D (2017) Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 4299–4307

  • Da Silva FL, Costa AHR (2019) A survey on transfer learning for multiagent reinforcement learning systems. J Artif Intell Res 64:645–703

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ding S, Du W, Zhao X et al (2019) A new asynchronous reinforcement learning algorithm based on improved parallel PSO. Appl Intell 49(12):4211–4222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan Y, Chen X, Houthooft R, Schulman J, Abbeel P (2016) Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control. In International Conference on Machine Learning pp 1329–1338

  • Egorov M (2016) Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. CS231n: convolutional neural networks for visual recognition

  • Finn C, Levine S (2017) Deep visual foresight for planning robot motion. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) pp 2786–2793. IEEE

  • Foerster J, Assael IA, de Freitas N, Whiteson S (2016) Learning to communicate with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 2137–2145

  • Foerster J, Nardelli N, Farquhar G, Afouras T, Torr PH, Kohli P, Whiteson S (2017) Stabilising experience replay for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70 pp 1146–1155. JMLR. org

  • Foerster JN, Farquhar G, Afouras T, Nardelli N, Whiteson S (2018) Counterfactual multi-agent policy gradients. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  • Fortunato M, Azar MG, Piot B, Menick J, Osband I, Graves A, Blundell C (2017) Noisy networks for exploration. arXiv preprint

  • Francois-Lavet V, Fonteneau R, Ernst D (2015) How to discount deep reinforcement learning: towards new dynamic strategies. Proceedings of the Workshops at the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Montreal, Canada: pp 107–116

  • Fu H, Tang H, Hao J, Lei Z, Chen Y, Fan C (2019) Deep multi-agent reinforcement learning with discrete-continuous hybrid action spaces. arXiv preprint

  • Fujimoto S, Van Hoof H, Meger D (2018) Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. arXiv preprint

  • Gao C, Kartal B, Hernandez-Leal P, Taylor ME (2019) On hard exploration for reinforcement learning: a case study in pommerman. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 24–30

  • Gmytrasiewicz PJ, Doshi P (2005) A framework for sequential planning in multi-agent settings. J Artif Intell Res 24:49–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gmytrasiewicz PJ, Durfee EH (2000) Rational coordination in multi-agent environments, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems 3 (4)

  • Greenwald A, Hall K, Serrano R (2003) Correlated q-learning. In: International conference on machine learning, vol 3, pp 242–249

  • Gu S, Lillicrap T, Sutskever I, Levine S (2016) Continuous deep q-learning with model-based acceleration. In International Conference on Machine Learning pp 2829–2838

  • Gu S, Holly E, Lillicrap T et al. (2017) Deep reinforcement learning for robotic manipulation with asynchronous off-policy updates. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Singapore: IEEE Press: 3389–3396

  • Gupta, J. K., Egorov, M., & Kochenderfer, M. (2017). Cooperative multi-agent control using deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems pp 66–83 Springer, Cham

  • Haarnoja T, Zhou A, Abbeel P, Levine S (2018) Soft actor-critic: off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. arXiv preprint

  • Hadfield-Menell D, Russell SJ, Abbeel P, Dragan A (2016) Cooperative inverse reinforcement learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems pp 3909–3917

  • Hadfield-Menell D, Milli S, Abbeel P, Russell SJ, Dragan A (2017) Inverse reward design. In Advances in neural information processing systems pp 6765–6774

  • Hausknecht M, Stone P (2015) Deep recurrent q-learning for partially observable mdps. In 2015 AAAI Fall Symposium Series

  • He H, Boyd-Graber J, Kwok K, Daumé III H (2016) Opponent modeling in deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning pp 1804–1813

  • Heess N, Sriram S, Lemmon J, Merel J, Wayne G, Tassa Y, Silver D (2017) Emergence of locomotion behaviours in rich environments. arXiv preprint

  • Hernandez-Leal P, Kaisers M (2017) Learning against sequential opponents in repeated stochastic games. In The 3rd Multi-disciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making, Ann Arbor

  • Hernandez-Leal P, Taylor ME, Rosman B, Sucar LE, Munoz de Cote E (2016) Identifying and tracking switching, non-stationary opponents: a bayesian approach, In: Multiagent Interaction without Prior Coordination Workshop at AAAI, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2016

  • Hernandez-Leal P, Kaisers M, Baarslag T, de Cote EM (2017) A survey of learning in multiagent environments: dealing with non-stationarity. arXiv preprint

  • Hernandez-Leal P, Zhan Y, Taylor ME, Sucar LE, de Cote EM (2017) Efficiently detecting switches against non-stationary opponents. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 31(4):767–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Leal P, Kartal B, Taylor ME (2018) Is multiagent deep reinforcement learning the answer or the question? A brief survey. arXiv preprint

  • Hessel M, Modayil J, Van Hasselt H, Schaul T, Ostrovski G (2017) Rainbow: combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning

  • Hessel M, Modayil J, Van Hasselt H, Schaul T, Ostrovski G, Dabney W, Silver D (2018) Rainbow: combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  • Hinton G, Vinyals O, Dean J (2015) Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint

  • Hong ZW, Su SY, Shann, TY, Chang YH, Lee CY (2018) A deep policy inference q-network for multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems pp 1388–1396. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Hu J, Wellman MP (2003) Nash Q-learning for general-sum stochastic games. J Mach Learn Res 4:1039–1069

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov S, D'yakonov A (2019) Modern Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms. arXiv preprint

  • Jiang J, Lu Z (2018) Learning attentional communication for multi-agent cooperation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 7254–7264

  • Jin J, Song C, Li H, Gai K, Wang J, Zhang W (2018) Real-time bidding with multi-agent reinforcement learning in display advertising. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management pp 2193–2201. ACM

  • Johnson M, Hofmann K, Hutton T (2016) The Malmo platform for artificial intelligence experimentation. In: IJCAI, pp 4246–4247

  • Kofinas P, Dounis AI, Vouros GA (2018) Fuzzy Q-Learning for multi-agent decentralized energy management in microgrids. Appl Energy 219:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kononen V (2004) Asymmetric multiagent reinforcement learning. Web Intell Agent Syst: An Int J 2(2):105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurek M, Jakowski W (2016) Heterogeneous team deep Q-learning in low-dimensional multi-agent environments. In Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), 2016 IEEE Conference on pp 1–8

  • Lakshminarayanan AS, Sharma S, Ravindran B (2016) Dynamic frame skip deep q network. Proceedings of the Workshops at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  • Lanctot M, Zambaldi V, Gruslys A, Lazaridou A, Tuyls K, Pérolat J, Graepel T (2017) A unified game-theoretic approach to multiagent reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systemsm pp 4190–4203

  • Lanctot M, Zambaldi V, Gruslys A et al (2017) A unified game-theoretic approach to multi-agent reinforcement learning. Advances in neural information processing systems. Los Angeles: NIPS Press 2017:4190–4203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer M, Riedmiller M (2000) An algorithm for distributed reinforcement learning in cooperative multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning

  • Leibo JZ, Zambaldi V, Lanctot M, Marecki J, Graepel T (2017) Multi-agent reinforcement learning in sequential social dilemmas. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems pp 464–473. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Levine S, Finn C, Darrell T, Abbeel P (2016) End-to-end training of deep visuomotor policies. J Mach Learn Res 17(1):1334–1373

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Wu Y, Cui X, Dong H, Fang F, Russell S (2019) Robust multi-agent reinforcement learning via minimax deep deterministic policy gradient. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

  • Lillicrap TP, Hunt JJ, Pritzel A et al (2016) Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Comput Sci 8(6):A187

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman ML (1994) Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. New brunswick: machine learning. Elsevier, USA, pp 157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Littman ML (2001) Value-function reinforcement learning in Markov games. Cognit Syst Res 2(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Lever G, Merel J, Tunyasuvunakool S, Heess N, Graepel T (2019) Emergent coordination through competition. arXiv preprint

  • Lowe R, Wu Y, Tamar A, Harb J, Abbeel OP, Mordatch I (2017) Multi-agent actor-critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30:6379–6390

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao H, Gong Z, Ni, Y, Xiao Z (2017) ACCNet: Actor-Coordinator-Critic Net for" Learning-to-Communicate" with Deep Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning. arXiv preprint

  • Mao H, Liu W, Hao J, Luo J, Li D, Zhang Z, Xiao Z (2019) Neighborhood cognition consistent multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Graves A, Antonoglou I, Wierstra D, Riedmiller, M (2013) Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Mnih V, Badia AP, Mirza M, Graves A, Lillicrap T, Harley T, Kavukcuoglu K (2016) Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning (pp 1928–1937

  • Nguyen ND, Nahavandi S, Nguyen T (2018) A human mixed strategy approach to deep reinforcement learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) pp 4023–4028. IEEE

  • Nguyen TT, Nguyen ND, Nahavandi S (2018) Deep reinforcement learning for multi-agent systems: a review of challenges, solutions and applications. arXiv preprint

  • Nguyen T, Nguyen ND, Nahavandi S (2018) Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning with human strategies. arXiv preprint

  • Noureddine D, Gharbi A Ahmed S (2017) Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for task allocation in dynamic environment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT), pp 17–26

  • Palmer G, Tuyls K, Bloembergen D, Savani R (2018) Lenient multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems pp 443–451. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Palmer G, Savani R, Tuyls K (2019) Negative update intervals in deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems pp 43–51. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Panait L, Luke S (2005) Cooperative multi-agent learning: The state of the art. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 11(3):387–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisotto E, Ba JL, Salakhutdinov R (2015) Actor-mimic: Deep multitask and transfer reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Peng P, Yuan Q, Wen Y, Yang Y, Tang Z, Long H, Wang J (2017) Multiagent bidirectionally-coordinated nets for learning to play starcraft combat games. arXiv preprint , 2

  • Perolat J, Leibo JZ, Zambaldi V, Beattie C, Tuyls K, Graepel T (2017) A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 3643–3652

  • Piot B, Geist M, Pietquin O (2016) Bridging the gap between imitation learning and inverse reinforcement learning. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 28(8):1814–1826

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz NC, Perbet F, Song HF, Zhang C, Eslami SM, Botvinick M (2018) Machine theory of mind. arXiv preprint

  • Raileanu R, Denton E, Szlam A, Fergus R (2018) Modeling others using oneself in multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Rashid T, Samvelyan M, De Witt CS, Farquhar G, Foerster J, Whiteson S (2018). QMIX: monotonic value function factorisation for deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Resnick C, Eldridge W, Ha D, Britz D, Foerster J, Togelius J et al (2018) Pommerman: a multi-agent playground

  • Rosman B, Hawasly M, Ramamoorthy S (2016) Bayesian policy reuse. Machine Learning 104(1):99–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rusu AA, Colmenarejo SG, Gulcehre C, Desjardins G, Kirkpatrick J, Pascanu R, Hadsell R (2015) Policy distillation. arXiv preprint

  • Samvelyan M, Rashid T, Schroeder de Witt C, Farquhar G, Nardelli N, Rudner TG, Whiteson . (2019). The starcraft multi-agent challenge. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems pp 2186–2188. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

  • Schaul T, Quan J, Antonoglou I, Silver D (2015) Prioritized experience replay. arXiv preprint

  • Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O (2017) Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint

  • Shalev-Shwartz S, Shammah S, Shashua A (2016) Safe, multi-agent, reinforcement learning for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint

  • Silver D, Lever G, Heess N et al (2014) Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Beijing, China: 387–395

  • Son K, Kim D, Kang WJ, Hostallero DE, Yi Y (2019) Qtran: Learning to factorize with transformation for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Song J, Ren H, Sadigh D, Ermon S (2018) Multi-agent generative adversarial imitation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 7461–7472

  • Song Y, Wang J, Lukasiewicz T, Xu Z, Xu M, Ding Z, Wu L (2019) Arena: a general evaluation platform and building toolkit for multi-agent intelligence. arXiv preprint

  • Stone P, Veloso M (2000) Multiagent systems: a survey from a machine learning perspective. Auton Robots 8(3):345–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez J, Du Y, Isola P, Mordatch I, MMO N (1903) A massively multiagent game environment for training and evaluating intelligent agents. arXiv preprint

  • Sukhbaatar S, Fergus R (2016) Learning multiagent communication with backpropagation. In Advances in neural information processing systems pp 2244–2252

  • Sunehag P, Lever G, Gruslys A, Czarnecki WM, Zambaldi V, Jaderberg M, Graepel T (2017) Value-decomposition networks for cooperative multi-agent learning. arXiv preprint

  • Tampuu A, Matiisen T, Kodelja D, Kuzovkin I, Korjus K, Aru J, Vicente R (2017) Multiagent cooperation and competition with deep reinforcement learning. PLoS ONE 12(4):e0172395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan M (1993) Multi-agent reinforcement learning: Independent vs. cooperative agents. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on machine learning pp 330–337

  • Tumer K, Agogino A (2007) Distributed agent-based air traffic flow management. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems pp 1–8

  • Van Hasselt H, Guez A, Silver D (2016) Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning. In Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

  • Vidhate DA, Kulkarni P (2017) Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning models (CMRLM) for intelligent traffic control. In 2017 1st International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Information Management (ICISIM) pp 325–331. IEEE

  • Wai HT, Yang Z, Wang PZ, Hong M (2018) Multi-agent reinforcement learning via double averaging primal-dual optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 9649–9660

  • Wang Z, Schaul T, Hessel M, Van Hasselt H, Lanctot M, De Freitas N (2015) Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint

  • Wang W, Yang T, Liu Y, Hao J, Hao X, Hu Y, Gao Y (2019) From Few to More: Large-scale Dynamic Multiagent Curriculum Learning. arXiv preprint

  • Wang W, Liu TYY, Hao J, Hao X, Hu Y, Chen Y, Gao Y (2019) Action semantics network: Considering the Effects of Actions in Multiagent Systems. arXiv preprint

  • Wei E, Wicke D, Freelan D, Luke S (2018) Multiagent soft q-learning. In 2018 AAAI Spring Symposium Series

  • Xi L, Yu T, Yang B, Zhang X (2015) A novel multi-agent decentralized win or learn fast policy hill-climbing with eligibility trace algorithm for smart generation control of interconnected complex power grids. Energy Convers Manage 103:82–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi L, Chen J, Huang Y, Xu Y, Liu L, Zhou Y, Li Y (2018) Smart generation control based on multi-agent reinforcement learning with the idea of the time tunnel. Energy 153:977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi L, Yu L, Xu Y, Wang S, Chen X (2019) A novel multi-agent DDQN-AD method-based distributed strategy for automatic generation control of integrated energy systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy

  • Xu D, Si J, Bian W (2016) Fingerprint orientation field extraction using gradient-based weighted averaging. International Journal of collaborative intelligence 1(4):287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Hao J, Meng Z, Zhang C, Zheng YZZ, Zheng Z (2019) Towards efficient detection and optimal response against sophisticated opponents. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence pp 623–629. AAAI Press

  • Yang Y, Hao J, Liao B, Shao K, Chen G, Liu W, Tang H (2020) Qatten: a general framework for cooperative multiagent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint .

  • Yang Y, Hao J, Chen G, Tang H, Chen Y, Hu Y, Wei Z (2020) Q-value path decomposition for deep multiagent reinforcement learning. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI)

  • Yin H, Pan SJ (2017) Knowledge transfer for deep reinforcement learning with hierarchical experience replay. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  • Zhang P, Hao J, Wang W, Tang H, Ma Y, Duan Y, Zheng Y (2020) KoGuN: accelerating deep reinforcement learning via integrating human suboptimal knowledge. In Thirty-seventh International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)s

  • Zhao Z, Gao Y, Luo B et al (2004) Reinforcement learning technology in multi-agent system. Comput Sci 31(3):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Ding S, An Y, Jia W (2018) Asynchronous reinforcement learning algorithms for solving discrete space path planning problems. Appl Intell 48(12):4889–4904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Ding S, An Y, Jia W (2019) Applications of asynchronous deep reinforcement learning based on dynamic updating weights. Appl Intell 49(2):581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Yang J, Cai H, Zhang W, Wang J, Yu Y (2017)s Magent: a many-agent reinforcement learning platform for artificial collective intelligence

  • Zheng Y, Meng Z, Hao J, Zhang Z, Yang T, Fan C (2018) A deep bayesian policy reuse approach against non-stationary agents. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp 954–964

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Nos. 61672522, 61976216, and 61379101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shifei Ding.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, W., Ding, S. A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications. Artif Intell Rev 54, 3215–3238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09938-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09938-y

Keywords

Navigation