Skip to main content
Log in

Computing most probable worlds of action probabilistic logic programs: scalable estimation for 1030,000 worlds

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The semantics of probabilistic logic programs (PLPs) is usually given through a possible worlds semantics. We propose a variant of PLPs called action probabilistic logic programs or -programs that use a two-sorted alphabet to describe the conditions under which certain real-world entities take certain actions. In such applications, worlds correspond to sets of actions these entities might take. Thus, there is a need to find the most probable world (MPW) for -programs. In contrast, past work on PLPs has primarily focused on the problem of entailment. This paper quickly presents the syntax and semantics of -programs and then shows a naive algorithm to solve the MPW problem using the linear program formulation commonly used for PLPs. As such linear programs have an exponential number of variables, we present two important new algorithms, called \( \textsf{HOP} \) and \( \textsf{SemiHOP} \) to solve the MPW problem exactly. Both these algorithms can significantly reduce the number of variables in the linear programs. Subsequently, we present a “binary” algorithm that applies a binary search style heuristic in conjunction with the Naive, \( \textsf{HOP} \) and \( \textsf{SemiHOP} \) algorithms to quickly find worlds that may not be “most probable.” We experimentally evaluate these algorithms both for accuracy (how much worse is the solution found by these heuristics in comparison to the exact solution) and for scalability (how long does it take to compute). We show that the results of \( \textsf{SemiHOP} \) are very accurate and also very fast: more than 1030,000 worlds can be handled in a few minutes. Subsequently, we develop parallel versions of these algorithms and show that they provide further speedups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharjee, Y.: Pentagon asks academics for help in understanding its enemies. Science 316(5824), 534–535 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Damasio, C.V., Pereira, L.M., Swift, T.: Coherent well-founded annotated logic programs. In: Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pp. 262–276 (1999)

  3. Dekhtyar, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Hybrid probabilistic programs. In: International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 391–405 (1997)

  4. Eiter, T., Lu, J.J., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Computing non-ground representations of stable models. In: Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pp. 198–217 (1997)

  5. Eiter, T., Subrahmanian, V.S., Pick, G.: Heterogeneous active agents, i: semantics. Artif. Intell. 108(1–2), 178–255 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87(1–2), 78–128 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hailperin, T.: Probability logic. Notre Dame J. Form. Log. 25(3), 198–212 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaumard, B., Hansen, P., de Aragão, M.P.: Column generation methods for probabilistic logic. In: Proceedings of the First Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference, pp. 313–331. University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lukasiewicz, T., Kern-Isberner, G.: Probabilistic logic programming under maximum entropy. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Proceedings of ECSQARU 1999) 1638 (1999)

  10. Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag (1987)

  11. Lakshmanan, L.V.S., Shiri, N.: A parametric approach to deductive databases with uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 13(4), 554–570 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leone, N., Scarcello, F., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Optimal models of disjunctive logic programs: semantics, complexity, and computation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 16(4), 487–503 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukasiewicz, T.: Probabilistic logic programming. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 388–392 (1998)

  14. Ngo, L., Haddawy, P.: Probabilistic logic programming and bayesian networks. In: Asian Computing Science Conference, pp. 286–300 (1995)

  15. Nilsson, N.: Probabilistic logic. Artif. Intell. 28, 71–87 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: A semantical framework for supporting subjective and conditional probabilities in deductive databases. In: Furukawa, K. (ed.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic Programming, pp. 565–580. The MIT Press (1991)

  17. Ng, R.T., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Probabilistic logic programming. Inf. Comput. 101(2), 150–201 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Subrahmanian, V.S., Albanese, M., Martinez, V., Reforgiato, D., Simari, G.I., Sliva, A., Udrea, O., Wilkenfeld, J.: CARA: a cultural reasoning architecture. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(2), 12–16 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroe, B., Subrahmanian, V.S., Dasgupta, S.: Optimal status sets of heterogeneous agent programs. In: AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 709–715. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Subrahmanian, V.S.: Cultural modeling in real-time. Science 1507, 309–310 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Emden, M.H.: Quantitative deduction and its fixpoint theory. J. Log. Program. 4, 37–53 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkenfeld, J., Asal, V., Johnson, C., Pate, A., Michael, M.: The use of violence by ethnopolitical organizations in the middle east. Technical report, National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (February 2007)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Subrahmanian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khuller, S., Martinez, M.V., Nau, D. et al. Computing most probable worlds of action probabilistic logic programs: scalable estimation for 1030,000 worlds. Ann Math Artif Intell 51, 295–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-008-9089-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-008-9089-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation