Skip to main content
Log in

Approximate Solutions of Continuous Dispersion Problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The problem of positioning p points so as to maximize the minimum distance between them has been studied in both location theory (as the continuous p-dispersion problem) and the design of computer experiments (as the maximin distance design problem). This problem can be formulated as a nonlinear program, either exactly or approximately. We consider formulations of both types and demonstrate that, as p increases, it becomes dramatically more expensive to compute solutions of the exact formulation than to compute solutions of the approximate formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boll, D.W., J. Donovan, R.L. Graham, and B.D. Lubachevsky. (2000). “Improving Dense Packings of Equal Disks in a Square.” Electronic Journal of Combinatorics R46.

  • Booker, A.J. (1996). “Case Studies in Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments.” In Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences. American Statistical Association, pp. 244–248.

  • Dimnaku, A. (2000). “Approximate Solutions of Continuous p-Dispersion Using Non-linear Programming.” Master's thesis, College of William & Mary. This research project was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree in Computational Operations Research.

  • Drezner, Z. and E. Erkut. (1995). “Solving the Continuous p-Dispersion Problem Using Non-linear Programming.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, E., Y. Ülküsal, and O. Yeniçerioğlu. (1994). “A Computational Comparison of p-Dispersion Heuristics.” Computers and Operations Research 21, 1103–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourer, R., D.M. Gay, and B.W. Kernighan. (1993). AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P.E., M.A. Saunders, and W. Murray. (1997). “SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-scale Constrained Optimization.” Report NA 97-2, Department of Mathematics, University of California at San Diego.

  • Gockenbach, M.S. and A.J. Kearsley. (1999). “Optimal Signal Sets for Non-Gaussian Detectors.” SIAM Journal on Optimization 9, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.E., L.M. Moore, and D. Ylvisaker. (1990). “Minimax and Maximin Distance Designs.” Journal of Statistical Inference and Planning 26, 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, J.R. and A.B. Owen. (1996). “Computer Experiments.” In S. Ghosh and C.R. Rao (eds.), Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 13, Elsevier Science, New York, pp. 261–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli, M. and U. Raber. (1998). “Packing Equal Circles in a Square: I. Solution Properties.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Locatelli, M. and U. Raber. (2002). “Packing Equal Circles in a Square: II. A Deterministic Global Optimization Approach.” Discrete Applied Mathematics (to appear).

  • McKay, M., R. Beckman, and W. Conover. (1979). “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code.” Technometrics 21, 239–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelmann, H.D. and P. Spellucci. (2003). “Decision Tree for Optimization Software.” World Wide Web, http://plato-asu.edu/guide.html.

  • Moré, J.J. and S.J. Wright. (1993). Optimization Software Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. See http://www-fp.mcs.anl.gov/otc/Guide/ SoftwareGuide for updated information.

  • Morris, M.D. and T.J. Mitchell. (1995). “Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments.” Journal of Statistical Inference and Planning 43, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A.B. (1992). “Orthogonal Arrays for Computer Experiments, Integration and Visualization.” Statistica Sinica 2, 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A.B. (1994). “Lattice Sampling Revisited: Monte Carlo Variance of Means over Randomized Orthogonal Arrays.” Annals of Statistics 22, 930–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, J., W.J. Welch, T.J. Mitchell, and H.P. Wynn. (1989). “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments.” Statistical Science 4, 409–435. Includes discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, B. (1993). “Orthogonal Array-based Latin Hypercubes.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 1392–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosset, M.W. (1999). “Approximate Maximin Distance Designs.” In Proceedings of the Section on Physical and Engineering Sciences. American Statistical Association, pp. 223–227.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael W. Trosset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dimnaku, A., Kincaid, R. & Trosset, M.W. Approximate Solutions of Continuous Dispersion Problems. Ann Oper Res 136, 65–80 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2039-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-2039-z

Keywords

Navigation