Skip to main content
Log in

Game Theoretic Analysis of a Distribution System with Customer Market Search

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a distribution system with one supplier and two retailers. When a stockout occurs at one retailer customers may go to the other retailer. We study a single period model in which the supplier may have infinite or finite capacity. In the latter case, if the total quantity ordered (claimed) by the retailers exceeds the supplier’s capacity, an allocation policy is involved to assign the limited capacity to the retailers. We analyze the inventory control decisions for the retailers using a game theoretical approach. The necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for the existence of a unique Nash equilibrium. A computational procedure is also proposed to calculate the Nash equilibrium. In case the Nash equilibrium does not exist, we use the concept of Stackelberg game to develop optimal strategies for both the leader and the follower.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anupindi, R. and Y. Bassok. (1999). “Centralization of Stocks: Retailers vs. Manufacturer.” Management Science 45, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G.P. and M.A. Lariviere. (1999). “An Equilibrium Analysis of Linear, Proportional and Uniform Allocation of Scarce Capacity.” IIE Transactions 31, 835–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Z., H. Gurnani, and B.E. Pasternack. (1995). “An EOQ Model with Substitutions between Products.” Journal of Operational Researcl Society 46, 887–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A. and K.F. McCardle. (1994). “The Competitive Newsboy.” Operations Research 45(1), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, S. and G. Van Ryzin. (2001). “Inventory Competition under Dynamic Consumer Choice.” Operations Research 49(5), 646–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, A.R. and E.A. Silver. (1978). “Some Concepts for Inventory Control under Substitutable Demand.” INFOR 16, 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons, M. (2000). An Introduction to Game-theoretic Modelling, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1986). Game Theory for the Social Sciences, Second and Revised Edition, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netessine, N. and N. Rudi. (2002). “Centralized and Competitive Inventory Models with Demand Substitution.” forthcoming in Operations Research.

  • Nikaido, H. and K. Isora. (1955). “Notes on Noncooperative Convex Games.” Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5, 807–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack, B.A. and Z. Drezner. (1991). “Optimal Inventory Policies for Substitutable Commodities with Stochastic Demand.” Naval Research Logistics 38, 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar, M. (1988). “Game Theoretic Analysis of the Substitutable Product Inventory Problem with Random Demands.” Naval Research Logistics 35, 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-Cherng Fang.

Additional information

The work was partially supported by the National Textile Center of the US Department of Commerce under Grant No. I01-S01. The second author is supported in part by NSF under DMI-0196084 and DMI-0200306.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dai, Y., Chao, X., Fang, SC. et al. Game Theoretic Analysis of a Distribution System with Customer Market Search. Ann Oper Res 135, 223–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-005-6243-7

Keywords

Navigation